John Lewis3
Active member
10D vs S2, old story, new thread to provoke a response.
Given '1ds' 12mp picture is way better than S2 12mp picture, and is not expected to equate, I ask the following.
Please compare the 10d 6mp picture upsized by 40% and set at 300 ppi (or from 100% to 140%) to the S2 12mp at 300 ppi picture and provide an opinion.
Given that the outdoors '10d' 6mp picture at URL """
"""
(see..... http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos10d/page20.asp )
and the outdoors 'S2' 12mp picture at URL
"""
"""
(see http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujis2pro/page17.asp ),
......and the '10d' indoors picture at URL
"""
"""
(see http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos10d/page21.asp )
and the indoors 'S2' 12mp picture at URL
"""
"""
(see http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujis2pro/page16.asp ),
If the 6mp is upsized by 40%, I ask the following...........allowing for slight differences in speed and weather and pollution etc between the shots......are they 'even stevens' ?
Does the S2 just tweak in, does the 10d gain significantly from its clarity to draw evenly, or does the S2 just provide that little bit more of significant detail ?
( assuming that 300 ppi and a4 size colour glossy prints magazine quality are needed )
Will the upsized picture hold up during the printing process ( assuming that 300 ppi and a4 size colour glossy print magazine quality are needed ) ?
Any opinions ?
Certainly the S2 picture could be upsized and so may indeed hold the 'upsize and cropping' advantage, but side by side what is the consensus ? Not that there are any winners and losers.
Given '1ds' 12mp picture is way better than S2 12mp picture, and is not expected to equate, I ask the following.
Please compare the 10d 6mp picture upsized by 40% and set at 300 ppi (or from 100% to 140%) to the S2 12mp at 300 ppi picture and provide an opinion.
Given that the outdoors '10d' 6mp picture at URL """
"""
(see..... http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos10d/page20.asp )
and the outdoors 'S2' 12mp picture at URL
"""
"""
(see http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujis2pro/page17.asp ),
......and the '10d' indoors picture at URL
"""
"""
(see http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos10d/page21.asp )
and the indoors 'S2' 12mp picture at URL
"""
"""
(see http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujis2pro/page16.asp ),
If the 6mp is upsized by 40%, I ask the following...........allowing for slight differences in speed and weather and pollution etc between the shots......are they 'even stevens' ?
Does the S2 just tweak in, does the 10d gain significantly from its clarity to draw evenly, or does the S2 just provide that little bit more of significant detail ?
( assuming that 300 ppi and a4 size colour glossy prints magazine quality are needed )
Will the upsized picture hold up during the printing process ( assuming that 300 ppi and a4 size colour glossy print magazine quality are needed ) ?
Any opinions ?
Certainly the S2 picture could be upsized and so may indeed hold the 'upsize and cropping' advantage, but side by side what is the consensus ? Not that there are any winners and losers.
