I have been auditing this forum for the last 2-3 months to see the
quality of the information/ advice given to all aspects of
photography, but mainly the technical issues. The information in
most case that been quite accurate, upto date and informative
although quite subjective with a bit of attitude at times.
I was just curious what your photographic backgrounds were and if
you were professional photographers or not. First, let me say that
I don't think you have to be "professional" to give good or
accurate advice.
Second, what is the exact definition of "professional
photographer"? For instance, I am a surgeon who is passionate about
photography and have been lucky enough to be able to sell my work,
to the point that I have been able to purchase all my camera
equipment and even my studio from the sales. Now, I don't have a
business license, no training certificate nor do I depend on my
photo sales for my living. So am I strictly an amateur? If I got a
business license would that change?
Third, does saying you're professional make you an expert or does
it obligate you to some standard. Recently, someone here claimed
they were a professional and then proceeded to describe a situation
that obviously was a basic mistake on the poster's part. He got
pretty "compact flashed" by the group here, mainly because he
started his thread by saying he was a professional. If he has said
nothing or said he was an amateur, would he have been only "memory
sticked" and been able to survive his injuries?
This thread is our chance to connect your screen name to your
background...don't worry we won't "compact flash" you for saying
you are or are not a professional.......at least not yet

!
--
Ninad
...resistance is futile...
http://www.ninadartworks.com