SLR to F707 to DSLR:

Nathan Dandar

Leading Member
Messages
622
Reaction score
0
Location
Marshfield, WI, US
(just my thoughts on my current and past cameras and what I think of my decision to move to a digital SLR)

Actually, that should be Canon A50 P&S digital to Nikon N4004 film SLR to Sony F707 to Canon D30.

I started with the A50 just for the convenience of digital and loved it. I took thousands of pictures with it (most of those lost in a huge hard drive crash). After a while, I grabbed a Nikon N4004 that had been sitting back at my parents' house and began getting familiar with SLRs. Last summer, I traded in the A50 for a Sony F707 and LOVED it. I took many many photos with it and learned a lot while it was in my possession. I grew a bit tired of a few of its traits and, after picking up an old Nikon FE2 manual SLR and four more Nikkor lenses, realized how much I loved the SLR format.

When the new Canon 10D came out, I knew people would be dumping their 'old' D30s and D60s like mad in order to get the new Canon offering. I quickly sold off my F707 on Ebay and bought a Canon D30 for $750. I also bought a Canon 50mm f/1.8 lens and Canon 28-135mm IS USM lens.

I have to tell you, there are a COUPLE negative points: Lack of IR mode in daylight with the use of an infrared filter (cool), no live preview on the LCD, no swivel body, twice the weight and size, no one-touch custom white balance, reduced battery life, has difficulting focusing in low light (lacking the F707's nice laser focus assist).. probably a couple other things.

Now, the positive points:

1. Twice the weight and size. It fits in your hand perfectly and feels very stable.

2. Lack of one-touch custom white balance. Not good in itself but it's nice that, to set custom white balance, you take a photo of a white object and then go through a menu function and select that as the white balance reference... so you can store multiple photos as white balance settings or store odd colored photos to get surreal color casts on demand.

3. VERY fast in comparison. Shutter lag is nearly nonexistant in comparison. Taking a string of photos in a row is quicker and the camera's buffer can hold more photos before having to stop and write to the card.

4. $89 for a 512MB compact flash card. 380 photos on the card at ISO 100 at the highest quality JPEG setting.

5. Lens dependent but most lenses stop down MUCH farther than f/8. My current 28-135mm IS lens stops down to f/22.
6. Histogram (I know it's on the F717. I had an F707)
7. Hot shoe (I know it's on the F717. I had an F707)

8. Flexibility up the wazoo. More white balance flexibility, flash exposure compensation (-+2EV), autofocus mode flexibility, multiple focus points, flash exposure lock, setting if the flash fires just as the shutter is fully open or just before the shutter closes, ISO 100 to 1600, control over saturation, sharpening, contrast etc etc etc.. on and on.

9. Noise.. or the lack of it. ISO 400 on the D30 seems to have about as much noise as ISO 100 on the F707. The photos are ridiculously clean at ISO 100 and 200. Even ISO 1600 is very useful. Even though the lens mounted on it right now operates at f/5.6 when at full telephoto, I can just set the camera to ISO 400 anyway to make up for it and still get a photo that looks as good as or better than the ones I got out of my F707

10. Ability to switch lenses.. something you forget about when you get used to P&S digicams. Such a NICE feature that I can't believe I lived without.

11. Lack of heavy in-camera sharpening. Most complain the D30/D60/10D images look softer than consumer digicams, straight out of the camera. In-camera sharpening is kept to a minimum, though. Run the photos through unsharp masking in Photoshop and the detail JUMPS out at you. Amazing. Loving the lack of JPEG artifacts introduced by massive in-camera sharpening that most consumer cams have.
12. I need to mention how fast this camera is, again.

The list could probably go on. I'm just finding that I'm LOVING this digital SLR thing. I was afraid I'd miss the F707 but haven't found that to be the case. Considering the fact that you can get a D30 for about $700, these days, and get a sharp, Image Stabilized, excellent lens like Canon's 28-135mm IS USM lens for ~$380 new, and get a 512MB CF card for $89, that brings the total to $1100-$1200 or so, depending on the deals you find. Not bad for a DSLR kit that's a tremendous joy to use. I know this is the Sony forum but I HIGHLY recommend at least trying out a friend's DSLR someday if you get the chance. I can tell it wouldn't be for everyone but I am giddy over it, yet.

(The F707/F717 is still an amazing camera)
 
hi,

i made the same switch a year ago and never looked back.

now i just keep a little point and shoot cam around for fun stuff, but the d30 still takes great pics.

--
way
 
Hi Nathan,

Thanks for sharing. This is the topic this week and your comments pretty much summed up what other people have said.

I just bought an F717 and will not quickly change to another one soon. I can't have my car sold after being with it for a month even the mileage is not much it's still a considered a second hand unit at eBay.

Will try to make money with my pictures first then make the switch if really necessary. I will watch out for the wear and tear of your D30. If what you paid for will last for another 3 years then its a good investment. I hope it does. If the previous owner did several mistakes on taking photos of the sun then maybe your cam will be blind in 6 months.

Please keep us posted.

Cheers!

EmnmE
http://www.emnme.com/index.htm
 
Nathan,

Is the Histogram live?

Richard_
 
1. Twice the weight and size. It fits in your hand perfectly and
feels very stable.
Yes this is either a positive or a negative.
3. VERY fast in comparison. Shutter lag is nearly nonexistant in
comparison. Taking a string of photos in a row is quicker and the
camera's buffer can hold more photos before having to stop and
write to the card.
The 717 is also very fast in comparison, although not (usually) as fast as a d30 (except in certain low-light conditions)
4. $89 for a 512MB compact flash card. 380 photos on the card at
ISO 100 at the highest quality JPEG setting.
The 128MB cards for the 717 are very cheap now too, people are getting them as low as $30 or so with rebate.
5. Lens dependent but most lenses stop down MUCH farther than f/8.
My current 28-135mm IS lens stops down to f/22.
Nice for avoiding the need for a ND filter when shooting flowing water but otherwise not very relevant. f/8 on a digicam gives the DOF of f/32 on a dSLR.
8. Flexibility up the wazoo. More white balance flexibility, flash
exposure compensation (-+2EV), autofocus mode flexibility, multiple
focus points, flash exposure lock, setting if the flash fires just
as the shutter is fully open or just before the shutter closes, ISO
100 to 1600, control over saturation, sharpening, contrast etc etc
etc.. on and on.
The 707 and 717 have control over sharpening. The 717 has some AF mode flexibility and focus points.
9. Noise.. or the lack of it. ISO 400 on the D30 seems to have
about as much noise as ISO 100 on the F707. The photos are
ridiculously clean at ISO 100 and 200. Even ISO 1600 is very
useful. Even though the lens mounted on it right now operates at
f/5.6 when at full telephoto, I can just set the camera to ISO 400
anyway to make up for it and still get a photo that looks as good
as or better than the ones I got out of my F707
Yes this is an advantage of the dSLR. I use Neat Image to compensate -- it works very well although a clean file to begin with would be preferable.
10. Ability to switch lenses.. something you forget about when you
get used to P&S digicams. Such a NICE feature that I can't believe
I lived without.
I switch lenses on my 717 all the time. It isn't quite as good as having a dSLR but the conversion lenses are much much cheaper than SLR lenses and quality is excellent.
11. Lack of heavy in-camera sharpening. Most complain the
D30/D60/10D images look softer than consumer digicams, straight out
of the camera. In-camera sharpening is kept to a minimum, though.
Run the photos through unsharp masking in Photoshop and the detail
JUMPS out at you. Amazing. Loving the lack of JPEG artifacts
introduced by massive in-camera sharpening that most consumer cams
have.
You could have turned this off on your 707 and it can be turned off on the 717. That's how I use my camera.

You are right, the dSLRs are great cameras and have some important advantages over the 707/717.

--
my favorite work: http://www.pbase.com/sdaconsulting/favorite_work
 
Nothing is live on a DSLR on the rear LCD. The LCD is only used to view pictures after they're taken or navigate the menu system. Because of the way the mirror and shutter system works, the CCD is only exposed at the moment you press the shutter.
 
Good points Nathan. I had the 505v for a year, the d30 for 14 months and now the 10d yesterday.

Two other lenses I'd recommend for you to keep the costs down -- the 20mm f2.8 --$400 at B&H -- see 10d pic below -- works great on the d30 also.

And the sigma 70 -200 f2.8 with the 1.4 extender -- at Deltainternational. $720 for both

Great move and shoot raw 16 bit in ps7 and Good luck!



MAC
http://www.digi-pictures.com
 
SLR > > Coolpix 800 > > Sony 707 > > Mamiya MF

Am I stepping back, or going forward, who knows? But for some landscapes I shoot, I need true enlargability, and the most affordabe way right now is Medium Format. The D1S is still over 7K, and you can get an entry level MF kit for around a grand these days. The only issue is scanning, which I will have to pay for on a case by case basis, but I cannot tell you how many times I have wanted to go really large with my 707 prints 20X30 at ofoto, for example, and I want that ability. My 707 will always be at my side for 90+% of my photography still, but for those grand landscapes, nothing (outside large format) can top MF.
 
Thanks for the real-world example of your experience. I'm thinking along the same lines as this and you have mirrored many of my thoughts through experience. I am more inclined to get a newer camera mind you but the examples still apply.
(just my thoughts on my current and past cameras and what I think
of my decision to move to a digital SLR)

Actually, that should be Canon A50 P&S digital to Nikon N4004 film
SLR to Sony F707 to Canon D30.

I started with the A50 just for the convenience of digital and
loved it. I took thousands of pictures with it (most of those lost
in a huge hard drive crash). After a while, I grabbed a Nikon
N4004 that had been sitting back at my parents' house and began
getting familiar with SLRs. Last summer, I traded in the A50 for a
Sony F707 and LOVED it. I took many many photos with it and
learned a lot while it was in my possession. I grew a bit tired of
a few of its traits and, after picking up an old Nikon FE2 manual
SLR and four more Nikkor lenses, realized how much I loved the SLR
format.

When the new Canon 10D came out, I knew people would be dumping
their 'old' D30s and D60s like mad in order to get the new Canon
offering. I quickly sold off my F707 on Ebay and bought a Canon
D30 for $750. I also bought a Canon 50mm f/1.8 lens and Canon
28-135mm IS USM lens.

I have to tell you, there are a COUPLE negative points: Lack of IR
mode in daylight with the use of an infrared filter (cool), no live
preview on the LCD, no swivel body, twice the weight and size, no
one-touch custom white balance, reduced battery life, has
difficulting focusing in low light (lacking the F707's nice laser
focus assist).. probably a couple other things.

Now, the positive points:

1. Twice the weight and size. It fits in your hand perfectly and
feels very stable.
2. Lack of one-touch custom white balance. Not good in itself but
it's nice that, to set custom white balance, you take a photo of a
white object and then go through a menu function and select that as
the white balance reference... so you can store multiple photos as
white balance settings or store odd colored photos to get surreal
color casts on demand.
3. VERY fast in comparison. Shutter lag is nearly nonexistant in
comparison. Taking a string of photos in a row is quicker and the
camera's buffer can hold more photos before having to stop and
write to the card.
4. $89 for a 512MB compact flash card. 380 photos on the card at
ISO 100 at the highest quality JPEG setting.
5. Lens dependent but most lenses stop down MUCH farther than f/8.
My current 28-135mm IS lens stops down to f/22.
6. Histogram (I know it's on the F717. I had an F707)
7. Hot shoe (I know it's on the F717. I had an F707)
8. Flexibility up the wazoo. More white balance flexibility, flash
exposure compensation (-+2EV), autofocus mode flexibility, multiple
focus points, flash exposure lock, setting if the flash fires just
as the shutter is fully open or just before the shutter closes, ISO
100 to 1600, control over saturation, sharpening, contrast etc etc
etc.. on and on.
9. Noise.. or the lack of it. ISO 400 on the D30 seems to have
about as much noise as ISO 100 on the F707. The photos are
ridiculously clean at ISO 100 and 200. Even ISO 1600 is very
useful. Even though the lens mounted on it right now operates at
f/5.6 when at full telephoto, I can just set the camera to ISO 400
anyway to make up for it and still get a photo that looks as good
as or better than the ones I got out of my F707
10. Ability to switch lenses.. something you forget about when you
get used to P&S digicams. Such a NICE feature that I can't believe
I lived without.
11. Lack of heavy in-camera sharpening. Most complain the
D30/D60/10D images look softer than consumer digicams, straight out
of the camera. In-camera sharpening is kept to a minimum, though.
Run the photos through unsharp masking in Photoshop and the detail
JUMPS out at you. Amazing. Loving the lack of JPEG artifacts
introduced by massive in-camera sharpening that most consumer cams
have.
12. I need to mention how fast this camera is, again.

The list could probably go on. I'm just finding that I'm LOVING
this digital SLR thing. I was afraid I'd miss the F707 but haven't
found that to be the case. Considering the fact that you can get a
D30 for about $700, these days, and get a sharp, Image Stabilized,
excellent lens like Canon's 28-135mm IS USM lens for ~$380 new, and
get a 512MB CF card for $89, that brings the total to $1100-$1200
or so, depending on the deals you find. Not bad for a DSLR kit
that's a tremendous joy to use. I know this is the Sony forum but
I HIGHLY recommend at least trying out a friend's DSLR someday if
you get the chance. I can tell it wouldn't be for everyone but I
am giddy over it, yet.

(The F707/F717 is still an amazing camera)
--
Regards,
AVB
http://www.photovanbeek.com
Winter Gallery
http://www.photovanbeek.com/Gallery/Winter2003/
 
I used a Canon A1 SLR for umpteen ages and loved it. Then switched to a Sony F707, and have been cursing it many times. Reasons?
  • Electronic viewfinder is slow and "coarse". I find it difficult to shoot action shots (car races, as car flies by me at 150+MPH or so). The refresh rate is abysmal.
  • Electronic focusing inaccurate. Many times I've tried shooting portrait shots where the background is way behind the subject. Camera invariably chooses the distant background. The quality of the viewfinder makes it very difficult to determine focusing accuracy.
  • Shutter lag. On action shots I usually switch to manual focusing and metering. This is where the F717 might have an improvment (no change in above two from what I know).
I feel a big cure to my complaints would be a "return" to a glass/mirror viewfinder like on a SLR. Idea of getting a used Canon D30/D60 is interesting, but I hate the idea of having to buy a selection of lenses and carry the suckers around with me. Also, the idea of shelling out another $1000 only a year after buying the F707 is abhorrent!

Ray Calvo
--------------------
(just my thoughts on my current and past cameras and what I think
of my decision to move to a digital SLR)

Actually, that should be Canon A50 P&S digital to Nikon N4004 film
SLR to Sony F707 to Canon D30.
(snip)
 
I rarely ever used the viewfinder on the F707. It made me feel like I was using a camcorder. The viewfinder on the D30 gives 95% coverage and 0.88X magnification so it's pretty darn good. The only complaint is that, yes it's 0.88X magnification, but that's 0.88X magnification on the APS-sized CMOS sensor.. what I'm saying is the viewfinder is smaller than my Nikon FE2's viewfinder. Oh well..

The lag between pushing the shutter than the F707 taking the photo was a huge hassle for me. You had to guess and try to take photos ahead of the moment you wanted them to get things timed out. Real pain.

If you think the F707's focusing is frustrating, just wait for the D30/D60/10D. The 10D may be a bit better (but they removed the focus assist lamp on it which is odd) but low contrast subjects and low light are impossible with the D30. It just hunts forever. There's always the 1D or 1Ds but then you're talking about spending ~$3500 or $7500 instead of $700.
 
20 x 30 are possible if you have Photoshop 7, stair interpolation from fred miranda's site -- a fast newer PC with .5 gig RAM minimum, preferable 1 gig ram and 2 -3 ghz processor -- and you use either an 8K 1ds with a 16 - 35 or a 14 mm canon lens on a 10d.

You need ~$3500 in gear to do this and then $2K for a pc and $600 for ps7 and stair interpolation --

total = $6100.

MAC
SLR > > Coolpix 800 > > Sony 707 > > Mamiya MF

Am I stepping back, or going forward, who knows? But for some
landscapes I shoot, I need true enlargability, and the most
affordabe way right now is Medium Format. The D1S is still over 7K,
and you can get an entry level MF kit for around a grand these
days. The only issue is scanning, which I will have to pay for on a
case by case basis, but I cannot tell you how many times I have
wanted to go really large with my 707 prints 20X30 at ofoto, for
example, and I want that ability. My 707 will always be at my side
for 90+% of my photography still, but for those grand landscapes,
nothing (outside large format) can top MF.
--
MAC
http://www.digi-pictures.com
 
a faster lens helps on my d30 AF (16-35L f2.8), but still it is not great in low light. but i have seen some pro action shots done with the cam in "normal" light.

i personaly manual focus everything, because the view finder is good this is not a problem.

--
way
 
Nathan,

Nicely said. Your comments made me stop and think as I'm on the verge of buyng a F717, but would really benefit from the operating speed of a D-SLR. A used D-30 sounds appealing.

BUT... Adding up the cost for a plunge into the D-SLR realm makes me appreciate the $ value of the F717 on the basis of its lens ALONE. It appears that a single zoom lens to match the one on the F717 (without compromising speed), or just two primes to cover each end of that range, cost as much if not more than the entire F717. How did Sony pull that off? (Hunch: while it's one of the best in its class, the F717 lens is probably outclassed by the Canon lenses.)

-Jeff (still debating....)
(just my thoughts on my current and past cameras and what I think
of my decision to move to a digital SLR)

Actually, that should be Canon A50 P&S digital to Nikon N4004 film
SLR to Sony F707 to Canon D30.
(snip)
The list could probably go on. I'm just finding that I'm LOVING
this digital SLR thing. I was afraid I'd miss the F707 but haven't
found that to be the case. Considering the fact that you can get a
D30 for about $700, these days, and get a sharp, Image Stabilized,
excellent lens like Canon's 28-135mm IS USM lens for ~$380 new, and
get a 512MB CF card for $89, that brings the total to $1100-$1200
or so, depending on the deals you find. Not bad for a DSLR kit
that's a tremendous joy to use. I know this is the Sony forum but
I HIGHLY recommend at least trying out a friend's DSLR someday if
you get the chance. I can tell it wouldn't be for everyone but I
am giddy over it, yet.

(The F707/F717 is still an amazing camera)
 
ALONE. It appears that a single zoom lens to match the one on the
F717 (without compromising speed), or just two primes to cover each
end of that range, cost as much if not more than the entire F717.
How did Sony pull that off? (Hunch: while it's one of the best in
its class, the F717 lens is probably outclassed by the Canon
lenses.)
That's the advantage of a small sensor ! The disadvantage is the noise, but the advantage is you can produce sharp, fast lenses inexpensively for smaller sensors.
  • Dennis
 
Another advantage of the D30 is the ability to shoot at ISO 400, when the shutter speed gets too low, without making the photo look terrible. The lens I have may operate at f/5.6 at full telephoto but it barely matters since I can change the camera to ISO 400 and still have clean, clear images. You can't do that with an F707/F717 and I have many photos I shot at ISO 100 with my F707 that exibit MUCH more noise than my D30's ISO 400 photos do... specifically in an area of one continuous tone like a sky.

The 28-135mm IS lens I have is a close match for the F717's lens in terms of reach. When you apply the 1.6X multiplier to the lens (because of the CMOS sensor's size being smaller than a 35mm frame), the lens comes out as a 44.8mm-216mm lens. I believe the F717's is the equivalent of 38mm-195mm or so. On top of that, the lens has Image Stabilization that works exactly like the stabilization in my Canon GL1 video camera (LOVE that camera). It's not an electronic stabilization done internally by the camera's software which reduces image quality. It's optical stabilization that detects camera shake and shifts the lens elements to compensate. I've taken many photos at 1/15th second and slower, handheld, and had them come out perfectly sharp with it. It's not a replacement for a faster fstop since moving subjects will still blur but it does allow for some pretty slow shutter speeds to be used while the camera is being held by hand.

If you get a used D30 (~$700) and lens (~$320), the final cost won't be TOO ridiculous. Right now, you can order a 512MB SimpleTech CF card from CDW for $139 and get $50 back, making the total cost, shipped, only $89. The final cost will be just over $1100 for the entire DSLR setup which I think is pretty darn low. Very highly recommended.
 
Thank you, Nathan, for making excellent points. Very persuasive. I had ruled out the Canon 28-135 IS USM lens due to its f/3.5-f/5.6 aperture range since I'm looking to capture gymnastics, where ISO 800 and f/2.8 are often required to get even 1/60th second shutter speed (the minimum needed; 1/125 is preferable).

For so many other uses, though, a setup such as you describe would be great. (Very tempting to click over to eBay right now and see how D30s are doing at auction these days.....)

-Jeff
Another advantage of the D30 is the ability to shoot at ISO 400,
when the shutter speed gets too low, without making the photo look
terrible. The lens I have may operate at f/5.6 at full telephoto
but it barely matters since I can change the camera to ISO 400 and
still have clean, clear images. You can't do that with an
F707/F717 and I have many photos I shot at ISO 100 with my F707
that exibit MUCH more noise than my D30's ISO 400 photos do...
specifically in an area of one continuous tone like a sky.

The 28-135mm IS lens I have is a close match for the F717's lens in
terms of reach. When you apply the 1.6X multiplier to the lens
(because of the CMOS sensor's size being smaller than a 35mm
frame), the lens comes out as a 44.8mm-216mm lens. I believe the
F717's is the equivalent of 38mm-195mm or so. On top of that, the
lens has Image Stabilization that works exactly like the
stabilization in my Canon GL1 video camera (LOVE that camera).
It's not an electronic stabilization done internally by the
camera's software which reduces image quality. It's optical
stabilization that detects camera shake and shifts the lens
elements to compensate. I've taken many photos at 1/15th second
and slower, handheld, and had them come out perfectly sharp with
it. It's not a replacement for a faster fstop since moving
subjects will still blur but it does allow for some pretty slow
shutter speeds to be used while the camera is being held by hand.

If you get a used D30 (~$700) and lens (~$320), the final cost
won't be TOO ridiculous. Right now, you can order a 512MB
SimpleTech CF card from CDW for $139 and get $50 back, making the
total cost, shipped, only $89. The final cost will be just over
$1100 for the entire DSLR setup which I think is pretty darn low.
Very highly recommended.
 
You need $597 70 -200 f2.8 at DeltaInternational.com -- for your d30.

ISO1600 BTW

Good Luck!
MAC


For so many other uses, though, a setup such as you describe would
be great. (Very tempting to click over to eBay right now and see
how D30s are doing at auction these days.....)

-Jeff
Another advantage of the D30 is the ability to shoot at ISO 400,
when the shutter speed gets too low, without making the photo look
terrible. The lens I have may operate at f/5.6 at full telephoto
but it barely matters since I can change the camera to ISO 400 and
still have clean, clear images. You can't do that with an
F707/F717 and I have many photos I shot at ISO 100 with my F707
that exibit MUCH more noise than my D30's ISO 400 photos do...
specifically in an area of one continuous tone like a sky.

The 28-135mm IS lens I have is a close match for the F717's lens in
terms of reach. When you apply the 1.6X multiplier to the lens
(because of the CMOS sensor's size being smaller than a 35mm
frame), the lens comes out as a 44.8mm-216mm lens. I believe the
F717's is the equivalent of 38mm-195mm or so. On top of that, the
lens has Image Stabilization that works exactly like the
stabilization in my Canon GL1 video camera (LOVE that camera).
It's not an electronic stabilization done internally by the
camera's software which reduces image quality. It's optical
stabilization that detects camera shake and shifts the lens
elements to compensate. I've taken many photos at 1/15th second
and slower, handheld, and had them come out perfectly sharp with
it. It's not a replacement for a faster fstop since moving
subjects will still blur but it does allow for some pretty slow
shutter speeds to be used while the camera is being held by hand.

If you get a used D30 (~$700) and lens (~$320), the final cost
won't be TOO ridiculous. Right now, you can order a 512MB
SimpleTech CF card from CDW for $139 and get $50 back, making the
total cost, shipped, only $89. The final cost will be just over
$1100 for the entire DSLR setup which I think is pretty darn low.
Very highly recommended.
--
MAC
http://www.digi-pictures.com
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top