I am wanting a DSLR to use for Architectural Photography. I was preparing to purchase an S2 Pro, but then got a look at info on the new Canon 10D. What really caught my eye is the $1499 price vs. the Fuji $2399 price...as the S2 Pro is at my upper limit of spendable budget for a DSLR body. This is what i would get for each system, Canon or Fuji:
Canon 10D body kit - $1499
Canon battery grip - $160
extra battery - $35
1 gig microdrive - $200
Sigma 15-30mm lens - $600
--------------------------------------
Total cost - $2494
or
Fuji S2 Pro body kit - $2399
Qimage for raw conversion - $40
8 AA rechargables & charger - $50
MB-16 grip - $70
1 gig microdrive - $200
Sigma 15-30mm lens - $600
(Nikon 12-24mm lens instead of Sigma, if it ends up being similar price)
-------------------------------------------
Total cost - $3359
I may not be able to get my hands on a 10D till May, who knows... the D60 availability was a nightmare, I tried to get one last summer, before the S2 came out, with no luck whatsoever! So the availability of the Canon camera concerns me.
I like the following about the Canon: the Magnesium body of the 10D over plastic, the "single" battery source over the dual source with CR123s, a grip that fits without jury rigging (designed for the specific camera), 1/3 EV steps over 1/2, 1/200 flash sync over 1/125th, capability of saving in camera 6mp raw files vs being restricted to 12mp raws (which i would plan to downsample to 6mp in computer), more raws can be saved on a 1 gig microdrive this way. The COST!! $865 less than the Fuji setup.
Here is what i like about the S2 Pro: Ability to shoot a 12mp file when needed (with its slightly higher discernable resolution), the compatibility of the new 12-24 Nikkor lens (giving a 18mm-36mm FOV on the S2), The S2 is available for purchase now! I like the reduction of moire' and jaggies that the S2 Raw files give, but they seem to have more noise over in camera jpegs...at least according to Mr. Askey. Overall, i think 10D and S2 noise levels are about an even match now.
If Canon is having problems meeting the demand for an $8000 SLR......How are they gonna meet the MUCH LARGER demand for $1500 unit?? In my opinion Canon really messed up big time with the D60 sales projections and lost lots of potential sales, including my purchase this past summer. They might lose another sale again, i can't get the D60 fiasco out of my mind.
I wanted the S2, but now that i know about that 10D, i'm not so sure anymore.....If I only never discovered the 10D on Thursday lol I have no exisiting SLR lenses, so a current stock of Nikon or Canon mount lenses do not apply to my decision. Can anyone here give me additional good reasons why I should spend $865 less for an 10D setup, and risk waiting months to get the camera?
Steve
Canon 10D body kit - $1499
Canon battery grip - $160
extra battery - $35
1 gig microdrive - $200
Sigma 15-30mm lens - $600
--------------------------------------
Total cost - $2494
or
Fuji S2 Pro body kit - $2399
Qimage for raw conversion - $40
8 AA rechargables & charger - $50
MB-16 grip - $70
1 gig microdrive - $200
Sigma 15-30mm lens - $600
(Nikon 12-24mm lens instead of Sigma, if it ends up being similar price)
-------------------------------------------
Total cost - $3359
I may not be able to get my hands on a 10D till May, who knows... the D60 availability was a nightmare, I tried to get one last summer, before the S2 came out, with no luck whatsoever! So the availability of the Canon camera concerns me.
I like the following about the Canon: the Magnesium body of the 10D over plastic, the "single" battery source over the dual source with CR123s, a grip that fits without jury rigging (designed for the specific camera), 1/3 EV steps over 1/2, 1/200 flash sync over 1/125th, capability of saving in camera 6mp raw files vs being restricted to 12mp raws (which i would plan to downsample to 6mp in computer), more raws can be saved on a 1 gig microdrive this way. The COST!! $865 less than the Fuji setup.
Here is what i like about the S2 Pro: Ability to shoot a 12mp file when needed (with its slightly higher discernable resolution), the compatibility of the new 12-24 Nikkor lens (giving a 18mm-36mm FOV on the S2), The S2 is available for purchase now! I like the reduction of moire' and jaggies that the S2 Raw files give, but they seem to have more noise over in camera jpegs...at least according to Mr. Askey. Overall, i think 10D and S2 noise levels are about an even match now.
If Canon is having problems meeting the demand for an $8000 SLR......How are they gonna meet the MUCH LARGER demand for $1500 unit?? In my opinion Canon really messed up big time with the D60 sales projections and lost lots of potential sales, including my purchase this past summer. They might lose another sale again, i can't get the D60 fiasco out of my mind.
I wanted the S2, but now that i know about that 10D, i'm not so sure anymore.....If I only never discovered the 10D on Thursday lol I have no exisiting SLR lenses, so a current stock of Nikon or Canon mount lenses do not apply to my decision. Can anyone here give me additional good reasons why I should spend $865 less for an 10D setup, and risk waiting months to get the camera?
Steve