photo restoration services.

This is my total lively hood and it's tragic when some amateur
wants to make a few extra bucks off of his/her hobby and take away
the food off of my table. My expenses are huge and I pay high
taxes on my profit. How many amateurs even report their "extra"
income to the IRS?

So thanks again for what you have written, I'm glad that there's
someone out there who realizes the damages that amateurs can have
on the professional's livelyhood
Gosh.. I didn't realize anyone was born a pro. I guess those of us
who are amateurs should just give up any thoughts of developing our
skills to the point where we could become pros. At any point in
your career were you ever considered an amateur? Did any pros tell
you you had no right to get into the business?

I might as well get rid of my equipment and software. I can't live
with the thought that I might have taken the food off of someone's
table.

Seriously, pros keep their business by being the best at what they
do not by discouraging others from the marketplace.

Jim
Jim,

I wasn't "born a pro" I got to be pro by working through college
to obtain my B.A. in photography at Brooks Institute. After I
graduated I worked extremely hard to establish myself as an expert
in my field, just as anyone would in any field that they felt
positive enough and confindent enough to pursue as a career since
they were 12 years old. This entire thread has been belittling to
the hard work that any professional has put into their field to
establish themselves as a professional. I have nothing against
amateur photograhers, if it wasn't for them the digital camera may
not even exist. My only complaint is with those "amateurs" who for
the fun of it, or ego of it, or to make a few extra bucks to buy a
new "toy".......will undercut the pro......get the job......and
most (maybe not all)......mess it up.

The reality is, most clients now realize the difference after
getting burned by weekend pros, unfortunatly it cost us all while
we waited for the client to realize how many people with digital
cameras and photoshop now consider themselves to be apart of the
"competition" and now know the difference. Once again......not all
amateurs are going to mess up the job, but from experience I can
tell you that 90% have.
Marlene
http://www.thedigitalspectrum.com
Marlene,
You have a great eye for photography. I don't. But have shot
hundreds of weddings and commercial over my professional life. I
was shooting when people used flash by GN and knew that a strobe
wasn't just a light for a disco. But I am a very good technician. I
compete on price. And I will get the job most of the time and do as
good or better then the high price guys. There are many "amateurs"
who have the skill to do what we do. I welcome "skilled amateurs"
into photography. Better then the many "unskilled pro's."

One more quick point. I just finished doing a layout and PDF for an
ad. Customer was being charged $300 by "pro" Graphic Designer on a
monthly basis. I have no training as a GD but know the techniques
used. Am I stealing the GD's livelyhood or keeping a client from
being gouged like the photographer is gouging his cutomer by
charging $100 for an 8x10?

I admire your artistic ability. I can only dream of doing that kind
of work. But a large part of photography doesn't require such a
high level of art.

Let the best person for the job get the job.
Bob
Forgot to mention I charged $190 for about 30 minutes of work for the client.

Bob
 
One more quick point. I just finished doing a layout and PDF for an
ad. Customer was being charged $300 by "pro" Graphic Designer on a
monthly basis. I have no training as a GD but know the techniques
used. Am I stealing the GD's livelyhood or keeping a client from
being gouged like the photographer is gouging his cutomer by
charging $100 for an 8x10?

I admire your artistic ability. I can only dream of doing that kind
of work. But a large part of photography doesn't require such a
high level of art.

Let the best person for the job get the job.
Bob
Forgot to mention I charged $190 for about 30 minutes of work for
the client.

Bob
Hello Bob and Thankyou,

Gouging by anyone for any product or service is a legal crime (excuse the oxymoran). I've been successfully self-employed for 27 years. I certainly didn't stay in the business by over pricing or doing shoddy work. I'm very fair priced and most professional photographers charge more than I do for what I do. However, what I do is unique and it appears to be easy, fun and glamorous to some.........believe me.......if another professional photographer knew he/she could do as good a job as I do for cheaper, they would be bidding on my jobs. However, that's never happened......by a pro.......only by the amateurs because they don't have the experience to know what's truely involved to put out the quality product in the strictest of time frames. The business of photography is a far cry from the hobby of photography. Being able to take great pictures when your shooting for hobby, with all the time in the world and your personal choice of subjects vs. working under very stressfull situations with exacting demands and extremely long work hours.......sometimes days without sleep......are two entirely different types of photography.
There's a very old saying "walk a mile in my shoes".

Thanks again for your kind words and input,
Marlene
http://www.thedigitalspectrum.com
 
Really well-said Richard! Bravo!

You made some valid points and you did it like a gentleman and a professional.

I'm an amateur photographer who doesn't take pro quality photos but I do take a lot of them. I also do a lot of image repairs in pursuit of my ancestors. After a couple years of modifying some pretty horrible antique photos I feel that I can handle just about any problem.

If I thought I could sell that skill to someone who was willing to pay me for the service I'd have no problem doing it. I would not feel ashamed that I was taking food from the mouths of working professionals, nor would I feel that I was shortchanging the "customer". I photographed my brother's wedding (no charge, of course) and I did not fret over the fact that a professional wedding photographer was not going to eat that night. I've installed several sound systems over the years (definitely a charge), far less expensively than professional installers, and I never worried about any pro's lost revenues.

I hope that this is not taken the wrong way. Just my opinion. Of course, I could be wrong.

By the way. The opening post just couldn't help drawing some very abusive responses and name-calling. Amazing how some people can take a seemingly innocent question and find a reason to attack.

Dan
 
Doug
Why the European Epson 2200?
My only reason for recommending the Epson 2200 (2100) is for print
longevity. I know this is a highly debated area, but the consensus
of opinioin seems to be that prints from printers that use
pigmented inks last longer.
I was under the impression that both Epson 2200 and 2100 use
the same Ultrachrome ink. What am I missing here?
Mook
Perhaps I shouldn't have been so specific. I think it's important
that the customer is given a print that won't fade in a few years.

If you worked with a frame shop, this could be turned into a
marketing tool, pointing out that proper archival framing is
critical to insuring the longevity of the print. If the customer
is going to the trouble of restoring a photo of their grandparents,
wouldn't it be nice if they did what they could to make sure their
grandchildren will have the image?

This makes me think of another point. I would never give the
customer a digital file of my restoration work. I would also print
a copyright on the back. If they want to argue it's their photo,
agree with them. Point out all the hard work belongs to you. They
are buying a finished product, not the processes used to create the
finished product. Asking for the work materials is like me asking
Michelin for the tire molds when I buy one of their tires. This
won't keep them from scanning and printing themselves, so I'd do my
price structure so I made all the money "up front" on the
restoration process. I'd then make the actual print prices
attractive enough that they'd be less likely to steal your work.
I'd make sure I pointed out that "archival" methods and special
equipment were used to create the print. Folks want to believe
what you tell them, as long as it makes sense. Just make sure what
you tell them is the truth.

Doug
 
There will always be someone better than you, and conversely, you are also better than many others, so I don't know where the standard is if there is one! I believe there is a market out there for photorestoration, but as Claus and I discussed once, it difficult to tap into. There is a Express Photo down the street from me, that claims to do restoration and retouch, but I know for a fact that they are very inexperienced but because they have a store, they attract people that need this kind of work done and it is not done very well there. Very different to find your customers if you have an in-home office (which I have worked out of for over 18 years) without an outlay of alot of advertising dollars that I am not sure you can recoup it. For me it has been pocket money, but if someone has some suggestions for generating work, I'm all ears. The first job I did was "The Guys" for $50. Have no idea how much time it took, but was a great learning experience...Dave Check it out here: http://www.pbase.com/davidjaseck/photorestorations
Has anybody here tried to make any money out of photo restoration?
The only reason I ask is that I may set up my own web site offering
retouching of old/new photographs. It would be on a hobby basis and
only if I make money to feed my habit (photography I mean), then I
will be more than happy. I've seen there are a few web sites
offering this service and charge, what I think, fairly high rates.
Is there a lively market for this kind of service or am I wasting
my time. Anybody who has done it, any pointers or advice for me?

Thanks

Richard
 
Gcam

I think you kinda missed my point on the golfing. This is what I mean. A Professional golfer cannot compete in this years tour(no matter how talented he or she may be) playing with equipment from two years ago. Titleist revolutionalized the game with thier pro-v ball. One now hits wedge to the green instead of a 6 iron. When Professionals paint or blow smoke in your face they are hiding something. Its takes me a total of 3 secs to lasso a blemish move the mouse right then left and viola the blemish is gone. Thanks to the photoshop 7 patch tool. I can give you a list of things that takes seconds or minutes.( even using alpha channels for differcult extractions.) As an Amature if I think theres money to be made in restoration and can charge money for it God Bless me. I could always use pocket money. Im a Mechanical Engineer..LOL I really dont look over my shoulder at whos graduating from college this year. Yanno because I try to keep up on the lastest technology. I have no fear at all. My work comes from the bidding process anyway soooooooooo lowest price gets da job. Can you imagine the companys I have to bid against. The DEMONS that the professionals fear here shouldnt be the amature or hobbist making a few extra bucks. Its Adobe, Plugin Manufacturers, Book writers, Tutorials, Actions and Advice that you get from this forum. These instruments are all making restoration a easier process. A professionals long hard hours are becoming a Amatures one click of the mouse. BTW photoshop 8 is coming out in the fall ....damn Adobe
Richard

ROFL......Times are a changing. Im in the heavy construction buis.
I hear all the time about how ppl have did it one way for their 20
or 30 years. New software or equipment changes the game. I bet I
can hit a golf ball 30 yards longer than I could ten years ago.
The ppl that learn the new technology will be the ppl that survive
and stay in buis. Not the artists.

cadmandew
 
that photoshop has made a few amateurs into at least semi-professional restoration artists, and the technology just keeps coming in waves making it difficult for some to swim. Regarding golf, I was just tugging on the chain. And there is a ball almost the equivalent in performance made by Dunlop, the cost of which is $16.00 for ten of them. As far as the sticks, it is still the fiddler not the fiddle as Harvey Penick said. good shooting and good bidding. gc
cadmandew wrote:
 
ROFL GCam ....I wish Adobe could teach me the game of golf. I read and practice alot but still never seem to get better. But i try.

Cadmandew
that photoshop has made a few amateurs into at least
semi-professional restoration artists, and the technology just
keeps coming in waves making it difficult for some to swim.
Regarding golf, I was just tugging on the chain. And there is a
ball almost the equivalent in performance made by Dunlop, the cost
of which is $16.00 for ten of them. As far as the sticks, it is
still the fiddler not the fiddle as Harvey Penick said. good
shooting and good bidding. gc
cadmandew wrote:
 
The DEMONS that the professionals fear here
shouldnt be the amature or hobbist making a few extra bucks. Its
Adobe, Plugin Manufacturers, Book writers, Tutorials, Actions and
Advice that you get from this forum. These instruments are all
making restoration a easier process.
They ARE afraid of that. A little while ago on this forum one of the "pros" was complaining because we write tutorials that teaches just anyone how to do techniques that it had taken him years to master. :)
A professionals long hard
hours are becoming a Amatures one click of the mouse. BTW photoshop
8 is coming out in the fall ....damn Adobe
hehehe!
Cricket
--
WWW.Casmaran.com
 
Again, you're right. I have learned much from the various forums and I have been amazed at the technical expertise of amateur and pro alike. I have spent the last 49 years in photography, retired last from wholesale photofinishing, gave away all my film cameras two years ago, went digital and never looked back. The best part is that shared knowledge makes all of us better. Thanks for responding. gc
shouldnt be the amature or hobbist making a few extra bucks. Its
Adobe, Plugin Manufacturers, Book writers, Tutorials, Actions and
Advice that you get from this forum. These instruments are all
making restoration a easier process.
They ARE afraid of that. A little while ago on this forum one of
the "pros" was complaining because we write tutorials that teaches
just anyone how to do techniques that it had taken him years to
master. :)
A professionals long hard
hours are becoming a Amatures one click of the mouse. BTW photoshop
8 is coming out in the fall ....damn Adobe
hehehe!
Cricket
--
WWW.Casmaran.com
 
I wonder about the rec for the European epson (which would be the
2100). The American 2200 works great. It just omitted that grey
calibrator, which was much more limited anyway compared with a good
printer profile.
I believe that the recommendation for the 2100 was because Richard's profile says that he lives in the United Kingdom...ergo, European version.

--
Tricia
Minolta Dimage D7(UG), Epson 2200, PS7, Qimage Pro
 
Has anybody here tried to make any money out of photo restoration?
The only reason I ask is that I may set up my own web site offering
retouching of old/new photographs. It would be on a hobby basis and
only if I make money to feed my habit (photography I mean), then I
will be more than happy. I've seen there are a few web sites
offering this service and charge, what I think, fairly high rates.
Is there a lively market for this kind of service or am I wasting
my time. Anybody who has done it, any pointers or advice for me?

Thanks

Richar
You know it's not the folks out there doing lousy work out there that are the problem for the pro. It,s the client that cant tell a good job from a bad job that hurts any profession. This being said there's always work out there that can be had by those still in the learning curve. endeavor to persevere
 
Has anybody here tried to make any money out of photo restoration?
The only reason I ask is that I may set up my own web site offering
retouching of old/new photographs. It would be on a hobby basis and
only if I make money to feed my habit (photography I mean), then I
will be more than happy. I've seen there are a few web sites
offering this service and charge, what I think, fairly high rates.
Is there a lively market for this kind of service or am I wasting
my time. Anybody who has done it, any pointers or advice for me?
Rich, To do true restoration is an art and does take years of
training and artistic skill. On the other hand, to make a copy of
the original, and then retouch that copy is another story
alltogether. Using any decent photo editing software program, you
should be able to restore the copy to the original in both look and
feel. This I do myself, and charge as the market will bear.This I
believe is the future of "Photo Restoration"
Ross
I have to agree here - I have been restoring photos for over 3 years now and making money. I was lucky that my brother needed a person to do restoration from sales he's developed. The guy he was using was useless and overcharged. So I started from scratch, researched commercial grade imaging gear and worked hard. My brother only accepted top quality. If the job wasn't right I'd redo it - then get paid!

15 months ago I started advertising in a free local paper. Just this week I picked up $1000 worth of work and this is just the tip of the iceberge. Every person I see I tell them a restored photo shouldn't look like it's been touched up - only the customer should know the difference. Showing them a recently worked image on a large 21 inch monitor and sundry pro gear always impresses. I have had to fix up jobs done badly by other people. Anyway I've done well over 1800 jobs so I'm confident of my skills. Don't expect to get much work off the net - my main clients are people who have no PC and just read the local paper. It's amazing when you have someone come in with 6-7 photos, quote $300(NZ) to fix and they don't bat an eyelid! Easy money for 4-5 hrs work. But remember you have to be confident you are the best!

Neal Martin
 
I have seen the work of some of the local professionals in weddings etc. Except for a few most live on their names not their work. I recently had a lady complain to me about paying 3000 for wedding photos that really stunk and that was her opinion. I wouldn't touch a wedding but I have done some outdoor portraits with touch up work. The customers loved it and most wouldn't have gone to a pro and spent a lot of money to begin with. I have played in photoshop for about 9 years and learn only what I need to know to get the job done that I desire. My work keeps improving and I would never take work from a "pro" because most of my customers wouldn't go that route anyway. It should also keep some of the so called pro on the toes.
John R>
 
This is sort of O.T. but I wanted to share an actual experience a friend of mine had.

A lady brought to his studio a 5x7 candid that had been taken in a wedding reception. She said: "I understand that you can 'pull' people out of a photo like this and put them in front of a studio type background to make a formal portrait. This is my aunt Helen, who died a month ago, and this is the only photo of her that we can find. She was very sweet to me and I'l like a nice 8x10 portrait of her to remember her by. Please remove her from this photo and make it a portrait. Also, have your technicians turn her around so we can see her face."

It really happened.

Doug
 
You know when you do a good job or not. If you do work that makes the customer happy for the price do it.

There are 'pros' out there that will discourage the 'amature' from getting in on the market but that is life....compitition.

Do good work, diliver it on time, charge fair prices and promise there will be no cost to the customer if they do not like the results. This, I have found in 40 years of doing such work, is the magic formula.

There are people out there who do not know how to use a computer and do not want to know. You are providing a service restoring their family treasures. So go fo it!
--
Darryl Cox
 
WOW Bart you said a mouth full.

Really like youe website. Great photographs. If you keep that stuff up you may become a professional photographer. :) You know some photographers become professionals by their education, seminars and generally sacrificing time to study the art of being one. It sounds like you have a chip on your shoulder but you are also aspiring to be a professional.

I say go for it, but drop the attiude. Think of it, your art being printed on an 8x10 sheet of paper being worth $100. Cool stuff to think your work is that good. Remember anybody can take a picture, but only a few take master pieces. Many professional started out part time and relized they loved it. Then they got the crazy idea they could make money at it. Then they opened up their first studio...... Lift is so short. Let us not fight over who should or shouldn't be.... Let's all just go do be it amateur or pro. There are thousands of photographs waiting to be retouched and thousands of portraits waiting to be taken, we all have alot of work to do, so let's go do it.

Robert

http://www.ifp2001.com
Marlene,

Well, I guess I'll be the voice of the "amateur." The bottom line
is in the world of photography; neither you nor any other "pro" has
the right to have exclusive privileges to sell your product. There
are people out there that do not want to pay the high prices the
"pros" get for a portrait or a wedding. I can undercut a pro
wedding photographer significantly because I don't have any
overhead - other than a high-end digital camera and a Kodak dye-sub
printer for any prints up to 8x10. I'm nowhere near the best
photographer in the world, but I do know I can hold my own to some
of the other "pro" work I've seen. It's not the intent of the
"amateur" to take away your lively hood, but instead do something
they enjoy doing and make a little money at it. Besides, the
clients most "amateurs" attract are not the ones that have more
money than brains and pay an absurd amount for wedding shoot and
end up with 'not-much-better-quality' than a well talented
"amateur." There's room for both "amateurs" and "pros" and there
always will be.

BTW, to add icing to the cake, I don't even keep a copyright to my
work. I give the client a CD with all the original pictures and
they're free to reproduce them however they want. I'll never
forget our wedding photographer wanting to charge us over $100 for
a copy of an 8x10 (this was back in 1994) and this is my little way
of retribution. He never got the $100 and we ended up taking the
original to a photo store and copied it on their photocopier for $8
(yea, I know it’s illegal, but charging over $100 for an 8x10
should be too). The print looked perfect and we still have it
today. Some “pros” simply take advantage of people with the
ridiculous prices they charge and the availability of high-end
digital cameras, Photoshop and good quality printers are leveling
the playing field.

To make a short story long, not all “amateurs” do shoty work and
some deserve to be paid a fair price for their work.

Bart
http://www.thedigitalshutter.com
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top