targa912
Well-known member
Forgot to mention I charged $190 for about 30 minutes of work for the client.Marlene,Jim,Gosh.. I didn't realize anyone was born a pro. I guess those of usThis is my total lively hood and it's tragic when some amateur
wants to make a few extra bucks off of his/her hobby and take away
the food off of my table. My expenses are huge and I pay high
taxes on my profit. How many amateurs even report their "extra"
income to the IRS?
So thanks again for what you have written, I'm glad that there's
someone out there who realizes the damages that amateurs can have
on the professional's livelyhood
who are amateurs should just give up any thoughts of developing our
skills to the point where we could become pros. At any point in
your career were you ever considered an amateur? Did any pros tell
you you had no right to get into the business?
I might as well get rid of my equipment and software. I can't live
with the thought that I might have taken the food off of someone's
table.
Seriously, pros keep their business by being the best at what they
do not by discouraging others from the marketplace.
Jim
I wasn't "born a pro" I got to be pro by working through college
to obtain my B.A. in photography at Brooks Institute. After I
graduated I worked extremely hard to establish myself as an expert
in my field, just as anyone would in any field that they felt
positive enough and confindent enough to pursue as a career since
they were 12 years old. This entire thread has been belittling to
the hard work that any professional has put into their field to
establish themselves as a professional. I have nothing against
amateur photograhers, if it wasn't for them the digital camera may
not even exist. My only complaint is with those "amateurs" who for
the fun of it, or ego of it, or to make a few extra bucks to buy a
new "toy".......will undercut the pro......get the job......and
most (maybe not all)......mess it up.
The reality is, most clients now realize the difference after
getting burned by weekend pros, unfortunatly it cost us all while
we waited for the client to realize how many people with digital
cameras and photoshop now consider themselves to be apart of the
"competition" and now know the difference. Once again......not all
amateurs are going to mess up the job, but from experience I can
tell you that 90% have.
Marlene
http://www.thedigitalspectrum.com
You have a great eye for photography. I don't. But have shot
hundreds of weddings and commercial over my professional life. I
was shooting when people used flash by GN and knew that a strobe
wasn't just a light for a disco. But I am a very good technician. I
compete on price. And I will get the job most of the time and do as
good or better then the high price guys. There are many "amateurs"
who have the skill to do what we do. I welcome "skilled amateurs"
into photography. Better then the many "unskilled pro's."
One more quick point. I just finished doing a layout and PDF for an
ad. Customer was being charged $300 by "pro" Graphic Designer on a
monthly basis. I have no training as a GD but know the techniques
used. Am I stealing the GD's livelyhood or keeping a client from
being gouged like the photographer is gouging his cutomer by
charging $100 for an 8x10?
I admire your artistic ability. I can only dream of doing that kind
of work. But a large part of photography doesn't require such a
high level of art.
Let the best person for the job get the job.
Bob
Bob