Best Nikkor Macro lens??

Yes. That's what Nikon calls their macro lenses that top out at 1:2 or 1:1 (to distinguish between the actual Macro lenses that yield 40:1 or greater than 1:1 magnification, most likely).

Ron
As a total amateur at this, I am getting ready to purchase a D100.
I have 3 lenses that I used with my 8008s. Can somebody tell me the
difference between a 60mm Macro and a 60mm micro? I have the
latter. So do I actually have the macro lens? Or?
--
Ron Reznick
http://digital-images.net
http://trapagon.com
 
As you approach 1:1, the effective aperture is reduced. This effect
starts as you focus close (focus at infinity with the aperture at
f/4, then manually focus closer -- you will notice that the macro
lenses report the reduction of effective aperture). This maintains
the exposure as you focus closer. All lenses work like this -- but
only a few macro lenses actually report this characteristic to the
meter.
They are fixed-aperture lenses because their nominal maximum aperture is constant. However, as you focus closer, there is an ever-increasing difference between nominal and effective aperture, which these Micor-Nikkors duly report back to the camera's display. A very neat feature and a big time-saver if you use a hand-held meter (which I frequently do).

Don't confuse the effective aperture change with the maximum aperture change of variable-aperture zoom lenses as they go along their focal lengths. If you put such variable-aperture on a bellows, say, you would have both changes in effective aperture and changes in maximum aperture concurrently.
 
Infinity f/4
7ft f/4.2
3.5ft f/4.5
2.75ft f/4.8
2.1ft f/5
1.65ft f/5.3

Ron
Has anyone an explenation for this ?
Thanks
Thomas
The ways I use the 200 Micro change with distance (of course). A
lot depends on what you are trying to achieve -- the actual
sweet-spot of the lens is quite broad -- from f/4 to f/11 (and just
slightly down at f/16), but when you get close-up the depth of
field is so shallow that often I tend to shoot the lens at f/8-f/11
(or f/16 when extremely close) to keep the plane of focus covering
the desired subject area. I shoot f/4-f/5.6 most often when the
subject is at a fair distance, unless I'm really trying to isolate
the subject or a part of the subject.

This was shot handheld at about 4 feet, f/8, Matrix, and the reason
for the extremely smooth background was the distance from the
subject to the background as opposed to the distance from the
subject to the lens. It's a good idea to keep that relationship in
mind when selecting the subject, or the angle you are shooting the
subject, if you are trying to isolate against a creamy background.
The light was sunlight exclusively -- again I select the shooting
angle to make use of the light too, and further refine the angle to
maintain the focus plane where I want it (note where the focus
plane falls).

Ron
as usual, the photo is amazing.
I also own this lens, but don't even come close in results. Hence
my questions:
  • what is the 'sweet spot' of this lens ?
  • how did you manage to get such great contrast between fore- and
background (the bokeh in this picture is IMHO as good as on your
85mm 1.4 photos) ? Can you explain the workflow of taking this
picture ? Like, the distance to the object, EXIF info, handheld,
what lightsource was used, etc... ?

Thanks for your input.

Thomas
The absolute best macro lens is the 200mm f/4 AF Micro, but it can
be difficult to hand-hold when you get up extremely close. It has
the greatest working distance, the greatest flexibility with
regards to aperture and shooting distance, and truly amazing
quality.

I've worked extensively with all three. I now own and use the 60
Micro and 200 Micro. Here is a shot taken today with the 200 Micro
at f/8:



The 60 Micro: ~$390
The 105 Micro: ~$650
The 200 Micro: ~$1350

Ron
i'm thinking about making some macro work... what lens do you
recommend?? and if you recommend tell the price of the lens... thx
--
Nikon it:D
--
Ron Reznick
http://digital-images.net
http://trapagon.com
--
http://www.pbase.com/tomwac
--
Ron Reznick
http://digital-images.net
http://trapagon.com
--
http://www.pbase.com/tomwac
--
Ron Reznick
http://digital-images.net
http://trapagon.com
--
http://www.pbase.com/tomwac
--
http://www.pbase.com/tomwac
 
Ron,

Do you know if the Tamron 90mm or the Sigma 105mm lenses report the reduction of effective aperture to the camera. I am in the process of looking for a macro lens in the 105mm range and both those lenses have been rated highly and are substantially less expensive than the nikon equivalents.

Thanks
As you approach 1:1, the effective aperture is reduced. This effect
starts as you focus close (focus at infinity with the aperture at
f/4, then manually focus closer -- you will notice that the macro
lenses report the reduction of effective aperture). This maintains
the exposure as you focus closer. All lenses work like this -- but
only a few macro lenses actually report this characteristic to the
meter.

Infinity f/4
7ft f/4.2
3.5ft f/4.5
2.75ft f/4.8
2.1ft f/5
1.65ft f/5.3

Ron
 
Oh man, Ron, incredible photos...again!

Now you've got me wanting to spend another $1400! What to buy first?!? Geez!!! I got the 105 several months ago and I am having soooo much fun with it. I love that macro stuff! I can hardly imagine using the 200. I'm gonna get it someday!!!

Thanks for the photos....

MF
 
Ron
As a total amateur at this, I am getting ready to purchase a D100.
I have 3 lenses that I used with my 8008s. Can somebody tell me the
difference between a 60mm Macro and a 60mm micro? I have the
latter. So do I actually have the macro lens? Or?
--
Ron Reznick
http://digital-images.net
http://trapagon.com
Ron

My D100 is coming soon, Im a dentist and used a 105 and the SB29,my N80 has TTl function,What about the D100? Which is the best and fine way to use the D100 without TT?
 
No, I don't... but it's pretty easy to find out (put on on the camera body and set max aperture at infinity, then focus closer and watch the aperture readout).

Ron
Do you know if the Tamron 90mm or the Sigma 105mm lenses report the
reduction of effective aperture to the camera. I am in the process
of looking for a macro lens in the 105mm range and both those
lenses have been rated highly and are substantially less expensive
than the nikon equivalents.


Thanks
As you approach 1:1, the effective aperture is reduced. This effect
starts as you focus close (focus at infinity with the aperture at
f/4, then manually focus closer -- you will notice that the macro
lenses report the reduction of effective aperture). This maintains
the exposure as you focus closer. All lenses work like this -- but
only a few macro lenses actually report this characteristic to the
meter.

Infinity f/4
7ft f/4.2
3.5ft f/4.5
2.75ft f/4.8
2.1ft f/5
1.65ft f/5.3

Ron
--
Ron Reznick
http://digital-images.net
http://trapagon.com
 
Thanks :^)

You wouldn't happen to be able to ID this, would you? Small flowers, relatively small bush (shot with 60 Micro today):



Ron
Oh man, Ron, incredible photos...again!

Now you've got me wanting to spend another $1400! What to buy
first?!? Geez!!! I got the 105 several months ago and I am having
soooo much fun with it. I love that macro stuff! I can hardly
imagine using the 200. I'm gonna get it someday!!!

Thanks for the photos....

MF
--
Ron Reznick
http://digital-images.net
http://trapagon.com
 
You can shoot with TTL and 3D-Matrix TTL with the D100...
Ron
As a total amateur at this, I am getting ready to purchase a D100.
I have 3 lenses that I used with my 8008s. Can somebody tell me the
difference between a 60mm Macro and a 60mm micro? I have the
latter. So do I actually have the macro lens? Or?
--
Ron Reznick
http://digital-images.net
http://trapagon.com
Ron

My D100 is coming soon, Im a dentist and used a 105 and the SB29,my
N80 has TTl function,What about the D100? Which is the best and
fine way to use the D100 without TT?
--
Ron Reznick
http://digital-images.net
http://trapagon.com
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top