iPhone5 disappointed by photos! Galaxy Note is super!

billorg

Senior Member
Messages
1,383
Reaction score
89
Location
US
I really was hoping for a jump in quality from my 3Gs to the 5 - and yes, it is a little less grain, but the color is off, also pale and it does not come close to the worst P&S. Today while in the ATT store, I shot a picture with the Samsung Galaxy Note and OMG it was like a good P&S!! SO different than the mush of the iphone 5. I also took one with the Galaxy 3S, it was very "ghosty" but it is very possible the lens was dirty so I would have to clean and re-shoot with it to be fair. But I was SO impressed by the Note - and it's 1/2 the price. Click to enlarge each.

iPhone 5:



Samsung Galaxy Note:

 
The iphone photo is a bit greenish but sharper. May be you have to use a photo app.
 
In the first one it looked like the photog moved.

The second one has an overall yellow color-cast.

One of the disappointing features of some smart phone cameras is a color-cast which seems to rear its head rather unpredictably. It seems like it's either yellow or magenta casts that I see around this forum.
 
The iPhoto shot is blurred because of the low shutter speed. Therefore, this photo is not really a good example of its capabilties. (It's certainly better than one would think based on the shot. Of course it doesn't come close to even the Nokia N8.)
The iphone photo is a bit greenish but sharper. May be you have to use a photo app.
Look at the T shirt the Galaxy Note is way sharper than the iPhone photo.
--
http://www.youtube.com/user/relate2
 
The iPhoto shot is blurred because of the low shutter speed. Therefore, this photo is not really a good example of its capabilties. (It's certainly better than one would think based on the shot. Of course it doesn't come close to even the Nokia N8.)
And you know the shutter speed is low how?

There is no exif information attached to the image.

--
http://www.youtube.com/user/relate2
 
Just look at the white letters on the yellow background in the left of the shot - they are blurred and not because of defocus / bad lens / grease.

(The iPhone 5's camera is definitely not THIS bad.)
The iPhoto shot is blurred because of the low shutter speed. Therefore, this photo is not really a good example of its capabilties. (It's certainly better than one would think based on the shot. Of course it doesn't come close to even the Nokia N8.)
And you know the shutter speed is low how?

There is no exif information attached to the image.

--
http://www.youtube.com/user/relate2
 
I don't know what you guys are seeing. The Note's image is way sharper than the iPhone's image. Look at the text on the T-shirt and the background. The iPhone seems to have trouble getting the focus right, producing a soft and slightly blurry image.

As for colour rendition, the iPhone appears to have a more orange tinge than the Note. Not too sure which is more accurate but overall the image on the Note is of higher quality and resolution.
 
I don't know what you guys are seeing. The Note's image is way sharper than the iPhone's image. Look at the text on the T-shirt and the background. The iPhone seems to have trouble getting the focus right, producing a soft and slightly blurry image.
The iPhone moved ever so slightly when the photo was taken. Either that, or the camera on the iPhone used is defective. My iPhone doesn't take blurry pics like that.
As for colour rendition, the iPhone appears to have a more orange tinge than the Note. Not too sure which is more accurate but overall the image on the Note is of higher quality and resolution.
To each their own. I don't like the yellow cast on the skin in the Note photo.
 
The iphone photo is a bit greenish but sharper. May be you have to use a photo app.
Look at the T shirt the Galaxy Note is way sharper than the iPhone photo.
Ok, this is a portrait right? What is the most important part in a portrait?
The eyes, they are sharper in the iPhone shot.
And look at the eyebrows in the first shot, they are not really sharp.
 
The iphone photo is a bit greenish but sharper. May be you have to use a photo app.
Look at the T shirt the Galaxy Note is way sharper than the iPhone photo.
Ok, this is a portrait right? What is the most important part in a portrait?
The eyes, they are sharper in the iPhone shot.
I am going to have to stop commenting on Apple products. When people are still saying the Apple maps work fine for them and there is no problem, it is a waste of time pointing out any minor camera problem.
--
http://www.youtube.com/user/relate2
 
The iphone photo is a bit greenish but sharper. May be you have to use a photo app.
Look at the T shirt the Galaxy Note is way sharper than the iPhone photo.
Ok, this is a portrait right? What is the most important part in a portrait?
The eyes, they are sharper in the iPhone shot.
I am going to have to stop commenting on Apple products. When people are still saying the Apple maps work fine for them and there is no problem, it is a waste of time pointing out any minor camera problem.
--
I think the sharpness is a user problem - it simply looks like the iPhone got bumped when the photo was taken.
 
Menneisyys wrote:

The iPhoto shot is blurred because of the low shutter speed. Therefore, this photo is not really a good example of its capabilties. (It's certainly better than one would think based on the shot. Of course it doesn't come close to even the Nokia N8.)
I think the low shutter speed of the iPhone combined with moderate lighting in the store may have contributed to the soft or *slightly* blurry picture instead of shaky hands. Most phones fail in low to moderate light, and perhaps this was the case with the iPhone which shows its weakness in these conditions. Although the Nokia N8 fails in low light by producing a lot of noise, the picture quality is still better when compared to most cameras, especially the iPhone. Well, just stressing a point although this post is about the Galaxy Note vs iPhone5.
 
relate2 wrote:
The iphone photo is a bit greenish but sharper. May be you have to use a photo app.
Look at the T shirt the Galaxy Note is way sharper than the iPhone photo.
Ok, this is a portrait right? What is the most important part in a portrait?
The eyes, they are sharper in the iPhone shot.
I am going to have to stop commenting on Apple products. When people are still saying the Apple maps work fine for them and there is no problem,
My opinion about the maps, the worst map navigation I have ever seen. Gave it a try yesterday travelling from a friend's place to my house, the map would get me to drive pass my house and turn on the next set of lights where there is not street to my residence. Also if you change route the maps do not recalculate and get stuck on its initial route. So it is the worst of the worst.
 
lanef wrote:

My opinion about the maps, the worst map navigation I have ever seen. Gave it a try yesterday travelling from a friend's place to my house, the map would get me to drive pass my house and turn on the next set of lights where there is not street to my residence. Also if you change route the maps do not recalculate and get stuck on its initial route. So it is the worst of the worst.
A friend who travels more on the road than sitting in the office uses Garmin maps and navigation whenever she wants to get to an unfamiliar place. She owns the iPhone 4S. She never mentions about the maps but I guess the big screen does it for her.


Note: We are not located in the States.
 
I don't own either and probably never will because of the cost...

But to me, the Note is better..Funnily enough, most people in other parts of world prefer the more Warm Orangey look, whilst most in UK prefer the cooler look.

In Competitions if a person is Orange looking it gets downpointed..
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top