sgoldswo
Veteran Member
I think this is a bit short sighted. Sure, in absolute resolution terms the NEX-7 produces the most accurate picture at the lowest ISO. Whether it is the most attractive picture is questionable indeed (it isn't to me, and I've owned both a NEX-7 and an X-Pro1). I own an M9 as well and I can tell you the only thing that is close is the Fuji.
To be frank I assume Sony ARE bricking it given the arrival of the X-E1. Their USP has gone.
To be frank I assume Sony ARE bricking it given the arrival of the X-E1. Their USP has gone.
I'm a dual Nex-7 and X100 user, and, oddly enough, there are many like me on other forums that aren't buying the X-P1 BECAUSE of the sensor. Go figure.
Even when raw conversion improves, Trans-x will always have lower chroma resolution than Bayer. You're trading low ISO performance for high ISO performance, so pick your poison.