Reading mode: Light Dark

D3200 is one of the best cameras for pro users

Go to last post
tabloid said:
intruder61 said:
tabloid said:
Kim Letkeman said:
tabloid said:
motobloat said:
Why? Soft core porn is just a giant softbox and f/8 to get everything sharp. All you need is a camera that does decent skin tones at default settings, and you don't even have to try. The model does all of the work (assuming she's good at her job), and the end customer doesn't give a damn about the artistic quality of the photo as long as there's good "exposure" haha. High resolution helps a lot for printing and selling website subscriptions - "we've got bigger files with better resolution of the naughty bits than that other website"
Click to expand...
You should check with a lawyer first before u put inaccurate stuff like this about people that you don't know in writing.
Click to expand...
That's quite funny. You can't, of course, be serious. There is no libel in his paragraph ... he never even mentions "you" ... he never says that "you" do soft core porn, he just discusses it in a derisive fashion. And very mild at that.

You need to get a grip ... and by the way, empty (stupid) threats have nothing to do with photography, just in case you forgot your own mantra ...
tabloid said:
I appreciate the publicity, but u could be skating on thin ice.
Click to expand...
It's not publicity. And he is not skating on any kind of ice because he mentions no specific person at all.
tabloid said:
Same ol crap...nothing to do with photography.
Enclosed a picture for u....
Don't go blind.
Click to expand...
Puerile, tediously repetitive, and dull.

--
http://kimletkeman.blogspot.com
Click to expand...
You are not a Lawyer.
In my business i use them quite often.
Click to expand...
then try me...NOTHING of any libel in motobloats statement.....but yet you think yourself of some grandeur by posting images of girls on all fours like Dogs do, and tell us not to go blind...Grow up you old age imbecile.
Click to expand...
Your are not a lawyer.......AND according to what you have written you are a closet woman hater with issues.
Your response was predictable....thats why i put the picture up there.

Suggestion: Get to know how to work the system.....been doing it for nearly ten years here....lol
Thanks for bumping this thread.
Click to expand...
lol......

 
Kim,

disregarding the tone of your reply (thereby assuming you´re not a troll) for now:

a) I judged only from testimages found on the internet (IR, Photographyblog, dpreview)

b) I developed RAW images using the adobe dng converter and ACR. I did not even bother to put up with JPGs.

c) I applied the same procedure on other cameras (mainly Nex7), with and without sharpening in PP. I can gain more detail from generous sharpening with the D3200, but a Nex7 file will equally benefit, keeping the distance.

d) I read other peoples account and reviews. I´m certainly not the only one to arrive at this conclusion. Someone here at dpreview even stated he had tried the D3200 with various lenses, and it wound up producing soft images regardless.

So it´s a very logical conclusion. I actually wish it were not this way.
 
tabloid said:
You should check with a lawyer first before u put inaccurate stuff like this about people that you don't know in writing.
I appreciate the publicity, but u could be skating on thin ice.
Click to expand...
"Your honor... the accused 'Motobloat' has been defaming my client 'Tabloid'... in some irrelevant online camera forum..."
 
Isn't that special!
 
More wimmen!
 
pavi1 said:
I have been giving a lot of thought to buying one for my Sigma 30 1.4. If i could find body only i would have already done the deal.
Click to expand...
My local camera store will often break up kits.
You might try something like that.
But, the D3200 kit lens is so inexpensive, that it might not save you much.
 
hjs_koeln said:
Kim,

disregarding the tone of your reply (thereby assuming you´re not a troll) for now:

a) I judged only from testimages found on the internet (IR, Photographyblog, dpreview)

b) I developed RAW images using the adobe dng converter and ACR. I did not even bother to put up with JPGs.

c) I applied the same procedure on other cameras (mainly Nex7), with and without sharpening in PP. I can gain more detail from generous sharpening with the D3200, but a Nex7 file will equally benefit, keeping the distance.

d) I read other peoples account and reviews. I´m certainly not the only one to arrive at this conclusion. Someone here at dpreview even stated he had tried the D3200 with various lenses, and it wound up producing soft images regardless.

So it´s a very logical conclusion. I actually wish it were not this way.
Click to expand...
Ive sort of got used to using NX 2 for RAW .
Im hoping that any softness is due to the 18-55 lens.
I did a couple of more shoots for one of my tabloid clients today.
Once this thread gets to 150 i will post some results.

As for bad manners on these threads don't take any notice, it comes with the territory.
Regards
George
 
I realize you like to wait a few hours before responding (like this time) because you don't want your threads to ever get to the second page but....
tabloid said:
Once this thread gets to 150 i will post some results.
Click to expand...
Why wait? He's reading here in this one.

Why not post them for him here instead of creating "yet another" thread based on the same imaginary topic ?
tabloid said:
As for bad manners on these threads don't take any notice, it comes with the territory.
Click to expand...
You don't take notice... but you DO respond to it constantly, and you DO follow people (i.e. me) to completely different forums that you've never posted in, just to respond in threads that person (me) is involved in.

Is that how you "don't take any notice" ?

(right about now is when you post yet another repeat of a woman you paid to pose for you.... make it the horse girl!)
 
Keep going....as I'm going to start a new thread soon.





In the meantime here is something for you to contemplate when u and your pal hit the sack.....most probably together......
So lets see which one of u will bark the loudest.
Keep bumping.
 
TFergus said:
I realize you like to wait a few hours before responding (like this time) because you don't want your threads to ever get to the second page but....
tabloid said:
Once this thread gets to 150 i will post some results.
Click to expand...
Why wait? He's reading here in this one.

Why not post them for him here instead of creating "yet another" thread based on the same imaginary topic ?
TFergus said:
As for bad manners on these threads don't take any notice, it comes with the territory.
Click to expand...
You don't take notice... but you DO respond to it constantly, and you DO follow people (i.e. me) to completely different forums that you've never posted in, just to respond in threads that person (me) is involved in.

Is that how you "don't take any notice" ?

(right about now is when you post yet another repeat of a woman you paid to pose for you.... make it the horse girl!)
Click to expand...
I thrive on it......others don't .
Keep bumping.
 
tabloid said:
Keep going....as I'm going to start a new thread soon
image that vioates dpreview's posting rules for adult content

In the meantime here is something for you to contemplate when u and your pal hit the sack.....most probably together......
So lets see which one of u will bark the loudest.
Keep bumping.
Click to expand...
Wow. Just wow. Now who's got issues?

You have a problem with homosexuals and you shoot naked women for a living. Hmm. Got a little secret you're trying to cover up? Overcompensating just a tad?

Maybe your decades of of repression can finally be over and you can come out of the closet.

Telllll us, we won't bite. Hard. Rowrrrr. :-)
 
motobloat, you not the dpreview forum police are you?

it seems you think you are from your utterly stupid senseless comment regarding this posting.

I'm interested in buying this camera for my son and this photograph shows off aspects of its lens and colour rendition.

Stop trawling this site making silly comments that affect other members reluctance to post and grow up!
 
848848 said:
I'm interested in buying this camera for my son and this photograph shows off aspects of its lens and colour rendition.
Click to expand...
All it shows you is the post processing abilities. You have no idea what created the image you are judging by.

Any decent camera could have shot this stuff... you're looking in the wrong place for raw, unprocessed comparison shots.
848848 said:
Stop trawling this site making silly comments that affect other members reluctance to post and grow up!
Click to expand...
If some online I.D. affects you like that, maybe the internet isn't the place for you.

Though I'm willing to bet the motivation for your first post here on the Nikon forums is more about trying to tell someone off, than it is about you actually looking for a camera.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Keyboard shortcuts

f
Forum
m
My threads
Mobile site
About
Editorial content
Cameras & Lenses
Community
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998–2025 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
©GPS Media - Guides, Products, Services.
Back
Top