Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hi Bob,Does this arrangement reduce the red-eye problem?
You may want to consider adding some sort of grip in the future - this
home made solution looks good!
Bob
They've got a variety of knurled knob mounting screws on page 37 of the "Porter's Camera" catalog (but they're not cheap, ranging $2 to $4, depending on "fancy").All I need now, is a fancier mounting screw. Comments welcome....
Frank,Love the simple design. Like you, I don't take many flash pics so I
couldn't see lugging around those big contraptions to hold the flash. I
may "borrow" l your idea and build one for myself. Thanks so much.
Hello Roln
Nice work. I love the SB-22s - it works great with 990/AS-E900/frame.
I ended up purchasing a stroboframe - ok I know its $. I did need to
splice the AS-E900 cable with some telephone cable. But it was easy.
I like the arrangement you have, as it is very 'small' and compact. I
bet you could find a 'camera' bag and keep it all together.
Again, thanks for the help on the SB-22s questions I had the other day.
Regards,
Dwight
They've got a variety of knurled knob mounting screws on page 37 of the
"Porter's Camera" catalog (but they're not cheap, ranging $2 to $4,
depending on "fancy").
What a great idea, btw . . . it looks sharp, and you can make exactly
the shape and configuration you want . . .
A simple, elegant solution, indeed! My only suggestion would be to
somehow raise the flash higher (as far as the cord will allow).
Took about 20 minutes to make from a piece of plexiglass. All I need
now, is a fancier mounting screw. Comments welcome....
Here is a shot that may have been a red-eye special but with the flash
up and above the lens, it just about eliminates it from every shoot. To
be honest I hae not seen a red-eye yet, in any of my photo's with the
quick flip frame and SB-22s.
![]()
Regards,
Dwight
Took about 20 minutes to make from a piece of plexiglass. All I need
now, is a fancier mounting screw. Comments welcome....
Okay on your suggestion. Why would I want the flash positioned higher?
I'd like to lower the flash unit so the bulb part is even with the lens,
but that would make the bracket an odd shape; which, is what I'm trying
to eliminate.
I take few flash pictures since I'm more of a "snapshot" kinda guy and
don't like carrying a large camera bag. I was happy with a bag on my
belt, til I got the external flash and telephoto lens. Now I'm back to
my old 35mm days!
Thanks for posting!
Roln
A simple, elegant solution, indeed! My only suggestion would be to
somehow raise the flash higher (as far as the cord will allow).
Generally speaking, you want the flash farther away from the lens to
lessen the chances of red eye. Putting it above the lens projects the
shadow created by the flash down (and behind) the subject. Also creates
more pleasing shadows on the subject's face, rather than the washed-out,
featureless look of most on-camera flash.
I agree that moving the flash farther away from the lens tends to create
a cumbersome rig, but it's a price you have to pay for better pictures.
(This is a lesson learned from many years in conventional photography -
I'm sitting here waiting for the UPS truck to pull up with my 990...)
Hope that helps,
Nick
Okay on your suggestion. Why would I want the flash positioned higher?
I'd like to lower the flash unit so the bulb part is even with the lens,
but that would make the bracket an odd shape; which, is what I'm trying
to eliminate.
I take few flash pictures since I'm more of a "snapshot" kinda guy and
don't like carrying a large camera bag. I was happy with a bag on my
belt, til I got the external flash and telephoto lens. Now I'm back to
my old 35mm days!
Thanks for posting!
Roln
A simple, elegant solution, indeed! My only suggestion would be to
somehow raise the flash higher (as far as the cord will allow).
Your post gives me the incentive to do some serious testing as to how
far the flash unit can be moved from the lens to lessen or eliminate
red-eye. I bet it is an inch more than the length of my cable. LOL
I agree with you, the pics will look better without the shadow from the
flash being left/right.
I've had the SB-22s two days and so far, most of my test pics have been
properly lighted. The key word here is "test"! In actual use, I'm
sure there will be plenty of screw-ups!
In any event, I'm having fun snapping pictures. Problem is, I'm not
getting anything else done around the house.
Roln
Generally speaking, you want the flash farther away from the lens to
lessen the chances of red eye. Putting it above the lens projects the
shadow created by the flash down (and behind) the subject. Also creates
more pleasing shadows on the subject's face, rather than the washed-out,
featureless look of most on-camera flash.
I agree that moving the flash farther away from the lens tends to create
a cumbersome rig, but it's a price you have to pay for better pictures.
(This is a lesson learned from many years in conventional photography -
I'm sitting here waiting for the UPS truck to pull up with my 990...)
Hope that helps,
Nick
Okay on your suggestion. Why would I want the flash positioned higher?
I'd like to lower the flash unit so the bulb part is even with the lens,
but that would make the bracket an odd shape; which, is what I'm trying
to eliminate.
I take few flash pictures since I'm more of a "snapshot" kinda guy and
don't like carrying a large camera bag. I was happy with a bag on my
belt, til I got the external flash and telephoto lens. Now I'm back to
my old 35mm days!
Thanks for posting!
Roln
A simple, elegant solution, indeed! My only suggestion would be to
somehow raise the flash higher (as far as the cord will allow).