The 60's

MikeF

Leading Member
Messages
967
Reaction score
11
Location
Thames, NZ
Remember when we all used TriX at 1600 asa and dev'd in Rodinal. Printed 16x20's on grade 4 or higher, mixed our own Hypo, wore long hair and a brace of Nikon F's were slung around the neck along with the chunky silver pendant.... probably not :-) but I thought I'd head back there.



MikeF

--
A few of my images... Watch out! there's some nudity about.
http://homepages.slingshot.co.nz/~mikefinn/
 
...as I remember turning my parents' kitchen into a darkroom after they went to sleep so I could develop pictures for the Hunter College Arrow, the one year I was its photographer. I used a Kodak Retina IIIC with Tri-X. Unfortunately, that fabulous little camera was stolen and I accepted a cash settlement instead of a replacement used camera from the insurance company because I was always short of cash!
I also remember cleaning up all that equipment.
What a joy it is to do processing in the computer!
Isabel

--
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipets/?yguid=11497599
http://www.pBase.com/isabel95
pBase supporter
 
I had (and still do somewhere) the Retina IIIc. What a beautiful little camera! And my first darkroom was the bathroom with a piece of plywood over the bathtub holding the three trays - VERY small bathroom!. Memory Lane is getting longer and longer these days! :-)

DianeR
...as I remember turning my parents' kitchen into a darkroom after
they went to sleep so I could develop pictures for the Hunter
College Arrow, the one year I was its photographer. I used a Kodak
Retina IIIC with Tri-X. Unfortunately, that fabulous little camera
was stolen and I accepted a cash settlement instead of a
replacement used camera from the insurance company because I was
always short of cash!
I also remember cleaning up all that equipment.
What a joy it is to do processing in the computer!
Isabel

--
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipets/?yguid=11497599
http://www.pBase.com/isabel95
pBase supporter
--
DianeR
pbase supporter
G2, EOS 650
 
Wiping down the negatives hanging from the shower curtain rod with the tongs that ended in sponges...the excitement of your first contact sheet...going into the closet to open up the film cassette and load the black plastic developing tank...didn't we have to agitate the top as the negatives developed?...(that was over 40 years ago...memories fade)...one more thing...I was very concerned about the proper disposal of my Staticmaster brush, because the warning that came with it was so ominous.
Isabel

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipets/?yguid=11497599
http://www.pBase.com/isabel95
pBase supporter
 
I still have two full darkrooms worth of equipment boxed in the attic....I just can't bring myself to sell it. Although I love the new "Lightroom" I still miss the smells and stains.

Rick Murtha
Remember when we all used TriX at 1600 asa and dev'd in Rodinal.
Printed 16x20's on grade 4 or higher, mixed our own Hypo, wore long
hair and a brace of Nikon F's were slung around the neck along with
the chunky silver pendant.... probably not :-) but I thought I'd
head back there.



MikeF

--
A few of my images... Watch out! there's some nudity about.
http://homepages.slingshot.co.nz/~mikefinn/
 
There was enough room in there to set up a small table with 3 trays. There was no running water, so I used a bathtub and a Kodak Tray Siphon. For a cheap date, I'd invite my high school girlfriend over and we'd close the door and see what would develop ;-). 37 years (32 married) and two sons later, we're still together. I feel sorry for budding photographers who have to work in the "light room".

Doug
Wiping down the negatives hanging from the shower curtain rod with
the tongs that ended in sponges...the excitement of your first
contact sheet...going into the closet to open up the film cassette
and load the black plastic developing tank...didn't we have to
agitate the top as the negatives developed?...(that was over 40
years ago...memories fade)...one more thing...I was very concerned
about the proper disposal of my Staticmaster brush, because the
warning that came with it was so ominous.
Isabel

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipets/?yguid=11497599
http://www.pBase.com/isabel95
pBase supporter
 
You are exactly right! However, I had a black "changing bag" to remove the film from the cassette...always looked like there was a squirrel jumping around in there! Actually, with my stainless steel film tank, the whole thing had to be agitated, not just the top. LOL -- I remember the Staticmaster brush warning too.

DianeR
Wiping down the negatives hanging from the shower curtain rod with
the tongs that ended in sponges...the excitement of your first
contact sheet...going into the closet to open up the film cassette
and load the black plastic developing tank...didn't we have to
agitate the top as the negatives developed?...(that was over 40
years ago...memories fade)...one more thing...I was very concerned
about the proper disposal of my Staticmaster brush, because the
warning that came with it was so ominous.
Isabel

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipets/?yguid=11497599
http://www.pBase.com/isabel95
pBase supporter
--
DianeR
pbase supporter
G2, EOS 650
 
Ah yes - familiar with the Kodak Tray Siphon too. The sign I'd post on the door (VERY official looking) was DO NOT OPEN DOOR AS DARK WILL ESCAPE! :-)

DianeR
Doug
Wiping down the negatives hanging from the shower curtain rod with
the tongs that ended in sponges...the excitement of your first
contact sheet...going into the closet to open up the film cassette
and load the black plastic developing tank...didn't we have to
agitate the top as the negatives developed?...(that was over 40
years ago...memories fade)...one more thing...I was very concerned
about the proper disposal of my Staticmaster brush, because the
warning that came with it was so ominous.
Isabel

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipets/?yguid=11497599
http://www.pBase.com/isabel95
pBase supporter
--
DianeR
pbase supporter
G2, EOS 650
 
Remember when we all used TriX at 1600 asa and dev'd in Rodinal.
Printed 16x20's on grade 4 or higher, mixed our own Hypo, wore long
hair and a brace of Nikon F's were slung around the neck along with
the chunky silver pendant.... probably not :-)
I seen that dude! ;-}

Nice trip. Thanks.

Kent
 
Mike,

I remember everything but the Nikon part. I had a college roomate that was a Pentax rep, so all my 35 mm equipment is Pentax. Other than that - yeah - Rodinal - great stuff!!! Remember the smell from the fixer & Hypo-clearing agents... Huge water bills from washing tons of prints... beakers & pipettes and graduated cylinders... funnels & brown glass jugs... Safelights!!!

Photoshop is so much neater :-)

= Ed =
Remember when we all used TriX at 1600 asa and dev'd in Rodinal.
Printed 16x20's on grade 4 or higher, mixed our own Hypo, wore long
hair and a brace of Nikon F's were slung around the neck along with
the chunky silver pendant.... probably not :-) but I thought I'd
head back there.
--
= Ed Rotberg =

'A waist is a terrible thing to mind'
 
Remember when we all used TriX at 1600 asa and dev'd in Rodinal.
Printed 16x20's on grade 4 or higher, mixed our own Hypo, wore long
hair and a brace of Nikon F's were slung around the neck along with
the chunky silver pendant.... probably not :-) but I thought I'd
head back there.



MikeF

--
A few of my images... Watch out! there's some nudity about.
http://homepages.slingshot.co.nz/~mikefinn/
I even remember pushing Tri-X to 3200, but it wasn't with Rodinal. It was another chemical, but I can't remember the name. It came in a small can. And here's one that really brings back memories. Do you remember the old Kodak "Direct Positive" kits where you would make black and white slides from the really slow Kodak black and white film (can't remember the name of it either)? I remember buying a lazy susan and setting it up in the bathtub because there were umpteen chemicals (developer, redeveloper, bleach, etc.) and they had to be switched pretty quickly as I remembered, so pouring into and out of a tank wasn't feasible. Gosh, those were the days.
dpd Indiana Univ. Photojournalism 1968-1972
 
I even remember pushing Tri-X to 3200, but it wasn't with Rodinal.
It was another chemical, but I can't remember the name. It came in
a small can.
Maybe it was D76

And here's one that really brings back memories. Do
you remember the old Kodak "Direct Positive" kits where you would
make black and white slides from the really slow Kodak black and
white film (can't remember the name of it either)?
Panatomic X ??? There was another one that was slower mostly came in 120 rolls..damn I can't recall it either :-)

I remember
buying a lazy susan and setting it up in the bathtub because there
were umpteen chemicals (developer, redeveloper, bleach, etc.) and
they had to be switched pretty quickly as I remembered, so pouring
into and out of a tank wasn't feasible. Gosh, those were the days.
Yup :-)

MikeF

--
A few of my images... Watch out! there's some nudity about.
http://homepages.slingshot.co.nz/~mikefinn/
 
All,

Enjoyed reading those 'way back machine' replys.

I remember the 70's. I don't think much changed in basic photography between the late 60's and in the middle 70's when I got educated about such matters. We were always reading articles in Pop. Photog. about pushing the 'ol TriX. I think someone got it up +5 stops once using nuclear fission in one of those articles. My theory was that those stories were just recycled every couple years when 80% of the subscriptions turned over so nobody would really notice.

I also remember:

...squegeeing (word?) the strips of negatives,
...bulk film canister reloading,
...stop bath stains on white t-shirts,
...pricing but never buying a temperature control system,
...using Graylab enlarger timers for practical jokes,
...Ektol, D76 and D11,
...photograms,
...making my own dodging tools,
...pennying someone into a film loading room,

...being accused of stealing the lenses (all 10 of them) off the enlargers at college, and later told that they got the 'real' thief (almost didn't get the diploma over that one),
...my beloved Canon AT-1 manual. Simple elegance.
...using the colleges 4 x 5 view camera for a couple weeks. That was magic.
Panatomic X ??? There was another one that was slower mostly came in > 120 rolls..damn I can't recall it either :-)
PanX. Best ever at ASA32. Yes, I used that one almost exclusively. Hardly any grain. The other pop. was PlusX at ASA125.

Slow? ASA32? Nah ! One of my photo teachers made his own emulsions and coated his own sheet film. He demonstrated what SLOW was once. 5 x 7 sheet in a view camera at f45 (not 4.5... 45!) with an effective ASA of 0.8. Took 45 minutes to expose the inside of a cathedral in Chicago in the daytime. It was a stunning amount of resolution, and still can't be beat today. We didn't challenge his claim that a resulting print, if it could be made life-size, would show hardly any grain. That was 25 years ago.

Oh, and BTW, Kodak still makes TriX, in 35 and 120. My guess is people are STILL trying to push it 5 stops.
  • David
MikeF wrote:
Remember when we all used TriX at 1600 asa and dev'd in Rodinal.
Printed 16x20's on grade 4 or higher, mixed our own Hypo, wore long
hair and a brace of Nikon F's were slung around the neck along with
the chunky silver pendant.... probably not :-) but I thought I'd
head back there.

MikeF
 
My goodness I remember all of that like it was yesterday..

I freelanced for a daily metropolitan newspaper over 25 years ago. We use to burst into the darkroom with a very hot pix of a fire or a car accident and pop the canister, "soup" the film "hot" for 15 seconds, quick stop, foto-flo, and print the negative wet. From the time you entered the darkroom till you threw the print on the city desk it was less than 3 minutes.

Those were the days..

I also remember polishing the print dryer daily with "Bon-Ami"... (before RC papers)
  • Bruce ;-)
Enjoyed reading those 'way back machine' replys.

I remember the 70's. I don't think much changed in basic
photography between the late 60's and in the middle 70's when I got
educated about such matters. We were always reading articles in
Pop. Photog. about pushing the 'ol TriX. I think someone got it up
+5 stops once using nuclear fission in one of those articles. My
theory was that those stories were just recycled every couple years
when 80% of the subscriptions turned over so nobody would really
notice.

I also remember:

...squegeeing (word?) the strips of negatives,
...bulk film canister reloading,
...stop bath stains on white t-shirts,
...pricing but never buying a temperature control system,
...using Graylab enlarger timers for practical jokes,
...Ektol, D76 and D11,
...photograms,
...making my own dodging tools,
...pennying someone into a film loading room,
...being accused of stealing the lenses (all 10 of them) off the
enlargers at college, and later told that they got the 'real' thief
(almost didn't get the diploma over that one),
...my beloved Canon AT-1 manual. Simple elegance.
...using the colleges 4 x 5 view camera for a couple weeks. That
was magic.
Panatomic X ??? There was another one that was slower mostly came in > 120 rolls..damn I can't recall it either :-)
PanX. Best ever at ASA32. Yes, I used that one almost exclusively.
Hardly any grain. The other pop. was PlusX at ASA125.

Slow? ASA32? Nah ! One of my photo teachers made his own
emulsions and coated his own sheet film. He demonstrated what SLOW
was once. 5 x 7 sheet in a view camera at f45 (not 4.5... 45!)
with an effective ASA of 0.8. Took 45 minutes to expose the inside
of a cathedral in Chicago in the daytime. It was a stunning amount
of resolution, and still can't be beat today. We didn't challenge
his claim that a resulting print, if it could be made life-size,
would show hardly any grain. That was 25 years ago.

Oh, and BTW, Kodak still makes TriX, in 35 and 120. My guess is
people are STILL trying to push it 5 stops.
  • David
MikeF wrote:
Remember when we all used TriX at 1600 asa and dev'd in Rodinal.
Printed 16x20's on grade 4 or higher, mixed our own Hypo, wore long
hair and a brace of Nikon F's were slung around the neck along with
the chunky silver pendant.... probably not :-) but I thought I'd
head back there.

MikeF
 
These post really sparked a few memories of my own such as loading cut film holders.. the bag of flash bulbs... someone knocking the reflector off the Speed Graphic at a wedding and someone else stepping on it. Those were the days. Oh yes, waiting for everyone to go to bed and the sun go down to use the kitchen sink (sand stone) and rushing to get a job finished before sunrise.
Mike I really enjoy the work you do and thanks for the memories.
Bob..
I freelanced for a daily metropolitan newspaper over 25 years ago.
We use to burst into the darkroom with a very hot pix of a fire or
a car accident and pop the canister, "soup" the film "hot" for 15
seconds, quick stop, foto-flo, and print the negative wet. From the
time you entered the darkroom till you threw the print on the city
desk it was less than 3 minutes.

Those were the days..

I also remember polishing the print dryer daily with "Bon-Ami"...
(before RC papers)
  • Bruce ;-)
Enjoyed reading those 'way back machine' replys.

I remember the 70's. I don't think much changed in basic
photography between the late 60's and in the middle 70's when I got
educated about such matters. We were always reading articles in
Pop. Photog. about pushing the 'ol TriX. I think someone got it up
+5 stops once using nuclear fission in one of those articles. My
theory was that those stories were just recycled every couple years
when 80% of the subscriptions turned over so nobody would really
notice.

I also remember:

...squegeeing (word?) the strips of negatives,
...bulk film canister reloading,
...stop bath stains on white t-shirts,
...pricing but never buying a temperature control system,
...using Graylab enlarger timers for practical jokes,
...Ektol, D76 and D11,
...photograms,
...making my own dodging tools,
...pennying someone into a film loading room,
...being accused of stealing the lenses (all 10 of them) off the
enlargers at college, and later told that they got the 'real' thief
(almost didn't get the diploma over that one),
...my beloved Canon AT-1 manual. Simple elegance.
...using the colleges 4 x 5 view camera for a couple weeks. That
was magic.
Panatomic X ??? There was another one that was slower mostly came in > 120 rolls..damn I can't recall it either :-)
PanX. Best ever at ASA32. Yes, I used that one almost exclusively.
Hardly any grain. The other pop. was PlusX at ASA125.

Slow? ASA32? Nah ! One of my photo teachers made his own
emulsions and coated his own sheet film. He demonstrated what SLOW
was once. 5 x 7 sheet in a view camera at f45 (not 4.5... 45!)
with an effective ASA of 0.8. Took 45 minutes to expose the inside
of a cathedral in Chicago in the daytime. It was a stunning amount
of resolution, and still can't be beat today. We didn't challenge
his claim that a resulting print, if it could be made life-size,
would show hardly any grain. That was 25 years ago.

Oh, and BTW, Kodak still makes TriX, in 35 and 120. My guess is
people are STILL trying to push it 5 stops.
  • David
MikeF wrote:
Remember when we all used TriX at 1600 asa and dev'd in Rodinal.
Printed 16x20's on grade 4 or higher, mixed our own Hypo, wore long
hair and a brace of Nikon F's were slung around the neck along with
the chunky silver pendant.... probably not :-) but I thought I'd
head back there.

MikeF
--
Bob..
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top