RBFresno
Forum Pro
Great shot Bob. The D4 was meant for you - so don't sweat it.
Hi Nikhil!On another note, I am thinking of getting the Zeiss 100mm for my D800. The only negative thing being that it goes to 1:2. I know you have this lens - is it really worth it? I am almost scared to hear the answer from you as that would mean $1843 out of my pocket.
Well.......
I can't imagine that you wouldn't love the Zeiss 100/2 (you knew that I was going to say that anyway, right?
Personally, for most of my photography, I could care less about not going 1:1 as I often find the narrow DOF a pain (and I have extension tubes should I ever get the 1:1 urge)
The Zeiss will definitely be up to meeting the demands of the D800's sensor.
At f/2, there can be some CA at high contrast interfaces.
Also, the lens is resonablty sharp at f/2, but sharpens up a lot by f/2.8, and is sharp across the entire frame
The build and manual focusing mechanism is great; not like trying to focus some of Nikon's recent AF-S lenses.
The Zeiss 100/2 is actually the lens that I most commonly leave on my camera. For a 100mm lens, it's pretty compact.
Here are some of my Zeiss shots:
http://www.zeissimages.com/standardgallery.php?puid=532&showall
I find the Zeiss 10/2 suprisingly versatile:
Great for "macro" closeups:
Nikon D3 ,Carl Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 2/100 ZF
1/2500s f/4.0 at 100.0mm iso400
Terrific for landscapes (even stopped down, it buries my 70-200VR I):
Nikon D3 ,Carl Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 2/100 ZF
1/2000s f/11.0 at 100.0mm iso200
Lovely for portraits:
Nikon D3 ,Carl Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 2/100 ZF
1/125s f/5.6 at 100.0mm iso1600
Crop:
Kind of like "mini-me" 200VR in terms of image rendering, but without the VR, AF-S and not as stellar wide open performance (but a lot cheaper than the 200VR!).
It's one of my favorite lenses!
Best regards,
RB
http://www.dpreview.com/members/2305099006/challenges
http://www.pbase.com/rbfresno/profile