Reading mode: Light Dark

d7000 + 17-55mm + urban decay = searing art

Go to last post
LOL....your the best...
please dont leave DPR, i need my daily laugh and you are my new muse.
......whoever you are.
 
these are all pretty weird/awkward to me
and you need an assistant with a reflector for this type of work...
 
Well, he just seems to want to be ignored, so why bother? Let's ignore.
 

BennyLava917 said:
no comments please
i dont really care what you think
Click to expand...
Anything goes in the name of 'art'
even if product of a brain 'f-art'...
Calls for a tribute to fit the artist's wit
a towering monument of solid 'sheet'

--
Best Regards
Sunshine

ps If you see someone without a smile on, give him one of yours... :)
 
Normally, I would ignore threads like this because I do not like being rude on the internet... there simply is not point. BUT you sir have no manners so here it is.

This photo fails for a number of reasons.

1) Could have been taken with anything. Any point & shoot and most good camera phones could have done this.

2) The photo has no real focus.

A) Could be the rust but there is too much going on.
B) Could be the graffiti but it is illegible thus annoying.
C) Shadows? Nah
D) The Object? WTH is it?
E) The plants growing on top of it- Again not tight enough.

3) Lighting is also unbalanced so I think it would look truly odd framed or mounted.

I could go on but I think you get my point (plus my dinner is ready). There is ART there... Yes, you need to go back and "SEE" it. As far as capturing it goes, your effort was a fail.

As your photo stands, the only way it can be art is- Print it and have Andy Warhol urinate on it.
 
work on your eye
FoolyCooly said:
Normally, I would ignore threads like this because I do not like being rude on the internet... there simply is not point. BUT you sir have no manners so here it is.

This photo fails for a number of reasons.

1) Could have been taken with anything. Any point & shoot and most good camera phones could have done this.

2) The photo has no real focus.

A) Could be the rust but there is too much going on.
B) Could be the graffiti but it is illegible thus annoying.
C) Shadows? Nah
D) The Object? WTH is it?
E) The plants growing on top of it- Again not tight enough.

3) Lighting is also unbalanced so I think it would look truly odd framed or mounted.

I could go on but I think you get my point (plus my dinner is ready). There is ART there... Yes, you need to go back and "SEE" it. As far as capturing it goes, your effort was a fail.

As your photo stands, the only way it can be art is- Print it and have Andy Warhol urinate on it.
Click to expand...
--



 
Advantages of the Nikon D7000

Shoots movies 1080p @ 24fps vs None

Shoots Full HD (1080p) video as well as still pictures
Significantly better image quality 80.0 vs 67.0

Around 20% better image quality
Lower noise at high ISO 1,167 ISO vs 679 ISO

The D7000 has a slight edge (0.8 f-stops) in low noise, high ISO performance
Better color depth 23.5 bits vs 22.1 bits

Distinguishes 1.4 more bits of color
More dynamic range 13.9 EV vs 12 EV

1.9 f-stops more dynamic range
Video autofocus Contrast detection vs None

Automatically focuses shooting video
Higher true resolution 16.1 MP vs 12.2 MP

Capture more than 30% more detail in your photos
Has more storage slots 2 vs 1

More slots allows storing more images without switching memory cards
Better maximum light sensitivity 6,400 ISO vs 3,200 ISO

The D7000's maximum light sensitivity is 1 f-stop better
Smaller 132x105x77 mm vs 147x114x74 mm

More than 10% smaller
Cheaper $1,096.95 vs $2,999.95

The best price we've seen is $1,903 cheaper (2.7x less)
Better boost ISO 25,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO

The D7000's boost ISO is 2 f-stops better
Lighter 780 g vs 925 g

Around 20% lighter

--



 
What does your camera's specs have to do with your ability to create? The D7000 is a nice camera but it's not "all-that". It it does not make you a professional if you own one. There are guys with REAL PRO cameras like the D4 who are little more than hobbyists with fat wallets.

Like I said, this could have been taken with an iPhone.
 
but it's way better than a d300
FoolyCooly said:
What does your camera's specs have to do with your ability to create? The D7000 is a nice camera but it's not "all-that". It it does not make you a professional if you own one. There are guys with REAL PRO cameras like the D4 who are little more than hobbyists with fat wallets.

Like I said, this could have been taken with an iPhone.
Click to expand...
--



 
Who cares? It does not make you a better photographer. It does not make your pictures automatically better than anything that comes out for the D300 forum. I've seen amazing work done from cameras as old as the D70 and old Canon D30.
 
I like this second shot--the lighting and colours. Kind of an abstract composition. Interesting.
--
Sandy
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Keyboard shortcuts

f
Forum
m
My threads
Mobile site
About
Editorial content
Cameras & Lenses
Community
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998–2025 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
©GPS Media - Guides, Products, Services.
Back
Top