daryl.com
Veteran Member
Thanks for your comments..I think i have fixed the issue...
d
http://www.daryl.com/2002 - photo calendar
http://www.pbase.com/daryl - pbase supporter
Was shooting with an Olympus C4040. Had to make
the move to the C5050, and glad I did.
d
--Expert, I'm not...But I've always got an opinion!
I'm going to go way out on a limb here... I see no evidence of
camera shake in the first three pics. The fourth? Maybe.
This is my thoughtful analysis (guesses) for each problem:
Pic#1: About to take a photo of the guy with glasses, aim,
half-press, focused perfectly on him, then the Sprint guy walks
into the photo and is captured accidently while the camera is still
(perfectly) focused on the guy with the glasses. No shake.
Pic#2: Using spot focus the couple is chosen as the subject, the
cam is pointed at them with their faces centered in the frame,
half-press, the camera focuses perfectly on a tiny spot on the wall
behind them, because they are not kissing at this point and the
"spot" focus sees between them the wall behind.
They then lean together to kiss, the shutter is fired and the wall
behind and the basket on the sill are perfectly focused...no shake.
Pic#3 In this shot, again, there is no evidence of camera
shake...actually, we have a perfectly focused/perfectly exposed
subject captured in this photo and it is the lady on the
foreground, of course. I n this case, the camera operated
flawlessly... but because the stop of f2.6 was used, the depth of
field available simply could not incorporate two subjects located
maybe 2' apart in focal distance.
Pic#4: I give up on this one... call it shake.
Ricky
R. Slaughter
'DEMOCRACY' is two wolves and a lamb voting on lunch.
'LIBERTY' is a well-armed lamb denying enforcement of the vote.
C+54.772256^2Z
http://www.pbase.com/nufsed/galleries
http://www.daryl.com/2002 - photo calendar
http://www.pbase.com/daryl - pbase supporter
Was shooting with an Olympus C4040. Had to make
the move to the C5050, and glad I did.