First Concert - Pictures in the next post

Airelle

Well-known member
Messages
216
Solutions
1
Reaction score
14
Location
FR
So last week I was asking for advice since I was going to be shooting my first concert. Well, now that I'm done with the basic PP (mostly importing into LR with achgeo's E-5 preset then tweaking sharping down and NR up, then cropping and sometimes adjusting WB), I selected some of the 157 pictures I'm left with to display here. I haven't picked any I'd like to develop as B&W yet.

For the gear-curious, I set off with my E-5 with a rented 35-100/2 on it, and my E-520 with the 12-60 on it. I even took a picture of them the day before:



I had never seen the 35-100 before, and pictures don't do justice to its size, you need to handle it to have a good idea. Despite its weight, with the tripod mount attached to my black rapid, it's balanced, and with my e-520 on my other shoulder, I didn't end up hurting from the shoulders at all even after carrying them for 3+ hours. Shooting with that takes some getting used to though, to find how to properly hold it so as not to move too much or accidentally turn the focus/length rings.

What I learnt from that concert is that I need to get more confident and move around a bit more (I stayed on the same side all evening as you can guess from the angles) and not hesitate to shoot even more. There were a couple other photographers, one of which I chatted with a bit before and after the concert (he was there originally for the opening act who had invited him) who had more experience at it (and whose job is photo/video) than me. He was a bit surprised that I'm a teacher, in fact. Other than that, the advice I was given here was put to good use (I think). Except the bit about not shooting the public, because the band went and played in the middle of the audience at some point ;)

In the end, I'm quite pleased with the results I got. The lens was probably front focusing slightly (you can see that the microphone ends up sharp and faces soft for example), but I didn't take the time (and didn't exactly have all I needed for it) to calibrate it before.

So in the end, it was fun, and I enjoyed both shooting and the concert. I wonder if I can do that again in the near future...
--
http://www.flickr.com/photos/airelle-info/
 
Courir les rues is a mix of French songwriting and big-band, and one thing they do well is get the audience involved, playing with their reactions and making them sing along or dance or clap...





When the public is too quiet, they motivate them.









































This is when they played in the middle of the audience.





























--
http://www.flickr.com/photos/airelle-info/
 
...band-in-audience shot but you pulled it off!

Yes, you were nailed to one spot, but on the other hand, it was a good spot to be, I think. Sure, some variation is great, but you don't want to be galloping around too much or someone in the audience will get up, grab your camera, and use it like a club on your head to subdue you! :)

Cheers, geoff
--
Geoffrey Heard
http://pngtimetraveller.blogspot.com/2011/10/return-to-karai-komana_31.html
 
...band-in-audience shot but you pulled it off!
Thanks

I have a couple of these with the 35-100 aswell, in the end they weren't that great (and I didn't post all the pictures here). With the 12-60 sadly, a lot of the band-in-audience turned out too underexposed to be salavaged.
Yes, you were nailed to one spot, but on the other hand, it was a good spot to be, I think. Sure, some variation is great, but you don't want to be galloping around too much or someone in the audience will get up, grab your camera, and use it like a club on your head to subdue you! :)
The pro photographer had more experience there and would crouch low to move around between songs, I'm quite sure he shot twice as many pictures as I did, too.
--
http://www.flickr.com/photos/airelle-info/
 
Goof job!

For my eyes have some pictures too much room above the heads of the musicians, I try to fill them out with the lights when shooting concert, but there were probably not many lights above the scene ... crop a bit?
--
pka
http://www.karlach.net/
 
Thanks.

Regarding the empty space: I cropped most pictures a bit already but I was trying to keep them somewhat rule of third-ish. Third one for example I could probably crop more since there's much space left on the upper left. The fourth one, on the other hand, to keep 4:3, I'd have to cut bodies to remove all the "empty" space above the heads. It's probably one of these where I'd have had a better picture if I had been standing more in the middle.
--
http://www.flickr.com/photos/airelle-info/
 
Thank You for posting a followup thread. I enjoyed the photos, the Trumpet player and next to the last were my favorites.

Did the 12-60 work out for you? I own a 12-60 but rented a 14-35 for a concert shoot to get the extra stop of light. Do you feel the 12-60 was adequate in a low light concert setting? For me f/2 and ISO 1600-2000 worked pretty well, with f2.8-f4 I would need to bump ISO to levels beyond what I'm comfortable with, any thoughts?

My dream lens would be the 14-35 focusing like the 12-60 now that would be smokin hot.

--
Have A Great Day!

Darrell
 
Thank You for posting a followup thread. I enjoyed the photos, the Trumpet player and next to the last were my favorites.
Thanks and you're welcome ;)
Did the 12-60 work out for you? I own a 12-60 but rented a 14-35 for a concert shoot to get the extra stop of light. Do you feel the 12-60 was adequate in a low light concert setting? For me f/2 and ISO 1600-2000 worked pretty well, with f2.8-f4 I would need to bump ISO to levels beyond what I'm comfortable with, any thoughts?
I had pretty much decided that I'd use the 12-60 at 12 only so that it's at f2.8. In addition, I set the e-520 to max at ISO800 (otherwise it gets really noisy and shows a lot of banding). In the end, even with an extra stop, I don't think the underexposed shots would have been better (they were 3-4 stops underexposed) and the ones I kept wouldn't have been significantly different I think (2mm less wide, and the 12-60's distortion ends up in the dark parts of the picture anyway, so they're hardly noticeable) while the lens would have been a bit bulkier (and would have cost me the rental fee on top of the 35-100's, too. Maybe if I was paid for it, but I was doing it for free, so all costs are for me ;))
My dream lens would be the 14-35 focusing like the 12-60 now that would be smokin hot.
The good thing when shooting 12mm is that there's almost no focusing to worry about since the dof is so large, as long as the subject is more than 3.5m away (vs 6.5m @14/2).
--
Have A Great Day!

Darrell
--
http://www.flickr.com/photos/airelle-info/
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top