I have the P500
and really noise reduction is even higher.
and no control over noise reduction.
The camera is also slower.
focus speed is poor.
The P500 have great image quality for small prints,but you better not look at 100% view.
The balance between the three camera's is the best of the HX100V
P500 even more noise reduction,and no fine detail.
FZ100 Better image quality then P500 but there is plenty of noise starting around iso 200
Raw pictures of the camera are so noisy.it is almost not possible to get an good picture from raw.
If you remove the noise from your raw pictures then end up like the Jpg pictures.
yes panasonic do an great job in there JPG output.
Hx100v well every one know about the camera.
It is still the best choice.
I read Thad the FZ150 is better,but not to say it is allot better,it is better at base iso.
high iso is also poor.
Any of you HX-100 owners seen the new P510 by Nikon and whether you feel that it might be a better superzoom than our Sony ? Would like to hear some responses thanks.
http://asia.cnet.com/product/nikon-coolpix-p510-45852007.htm
--
My english is poor.Try to Understand
Nikon D70s,Nikon D90,LX3,DP-1 FZ38 FZ100 G11 S95
http://www.flickr.com/photos/73737307@N00/sets/
Claus M