So what's wrong with these pictures? :)

Photos ..even such as 'live' TV clips... can look very good indeed on an iPhone...I've seen lots of that AND been impressed with the viewing available on what is then of course a moment you simply cannot get if you happen to be out.. other than on such as an iPhone (or other brand). But those are very small pics..at that level they can look good..but frankly as soon as you start blowing them up in any degree..I just think they go to pot..if you compare them against quite a few of the good little carryable P&S...they do make a very much better job of it..after all.. they ARE designed for that..a phone is NOT..to the same extent..
Well Eric, as much as you doubt, the details, here is a crop of an image we took last fall when apple picking with the kids.

Scene cropped slightly to 7mp's

As noted, this is the images as I cropped away just a small bit of it to balance the scene.



and here's a 100% crop from that same scene

100% Crop



Now I don't know how much experience you have with enlarging images or printing big, but I can tell you that the 8mp details here come through quite nicely and I would be hard pressed to agree in saying the 4s images go to pot when viewing them at size.

Just to recap, this was more of a thread on content and humor as images seen through the mind of my 8yr old son, but I have no problem discussing the IQ of a 4s vs a typical point and shoot.

--
  • tim
--

Note my new Screen Name has changed due to some privacy issues I was having to deal with, but I'm the same old long time member. Email or Message me anytime though.
 
Before I say more - just one little matter you say here ...
Take it further and I'm sure there are large format or Digital MF usesr out there who scoff at the pretentious people who think just because they bought a high end DSLR that the know the first thing about photography.
Now that is something I really do agree with. . and maybe in truth, it sort of niggles me to the point that I may give a remark about a point that possibly is not truly a similar case .. I too have used high quality equipment. back into old film days, and I used what I then regarded as a super little Minolta Autometer..the last one before they ruined it by introducing it in digital form, and every shot was metered.. and the cameras were the cream at the time. It mattered then to get the best shot..you only had a limited number available on a roll of film so it had to be good.

But in this day, I'm afraid there ARE a lot who do buy some high-flying digital dSLR type.. which I just know from a few experiences they simply do not know how to use properly.. but because it is an expensive camera in their hands they do really seem to think that they are "photographers". And I see nowadays on these Forums such a lot of instances where this is obvious.. so I honestly have to say that on occasions I can't help but get niggled a bit by the use of what after all is really NOT a camera at all..then it is suddenly regarded as a kind of panacea for all.

Now having said that - I'm NOT implying that it is so here.. but purely in a restricted area ...NOT quite the same as YOU have in mind I think - my original comment was , I do feel, justiable to some degree , as an iPhone is just quite NOT a camera.. and I still think that pics from ANY phone... good in general as they may be.. are just not comparable fully with what can be obtained from a "proper" camera of small and similar type.

Your reply here I accept fully - although I do think it is extending the original post discussion far too much - it was never supposed to relate to that extent.. but it still basically is in relation to the potential of a 'real' camera of very similar carryability, to any sort of phone camera. The iPhone seems to be the one most often mentioned when this crops up.. although I'm sure there are other phones very much the equal to it if you want to use them to take a pic.

But ALL I really have in mind is NOT the comparison or even suggested usage of some expensive high-faluting posh proper camera... just simply my belief that a GOOD (as now we have them) pocket compact camera IS and always will be by far the better of any phone camera. Let's face it..they are MADE that way..an iPhone (or any similar) is a PHONE.. and THAT is only what I'm saying.

It may well be just my own firm opinion, but right or wrong in others eyes.. I stick to it...

Thanks for your input anyway..I agree vey much with most you say..although it is not quite totally relevant to the original thoughts expressed.

--
eric-UK
Staffordshire
 
Jeff-

I picked up on some little comment you said somewhere earlier and I rather thought that good Vids capability was a bigger item to you than it is certainly in my case. But I think there are a few little pocket-type cams apart from the S100 that MAY fill the bill and give that same overal better capability . Out of interest and spurred by what you had said, I looked up that little Panasonic..it is the FT2 here.. "waterproof" and very rugged it seems..although I really don't think the folded optics can maybe do it good (!!)... but believe it or not..THAT one is presently selling here for not far off what I bought my S95 for.. Of course the S100 is now about £100 more than that FT2.. but if indeed the S100 is anything like my S95 (and of course it is a different type engine..) what I've always liked on the S95 is that even is poor or low lighting, it rarely seems to blatantly run up the ISO scale...I've had many shots in less than good light or good conditions, where it has still maintained such as ISO 100 or 200 at most.. I never bother - I just set it and shoot...and am invariably delighted with what it gives.. but looking at the details later perhaps...this good setting it gives by nature, has always been another high point in its favour. I have an LX3 which is probably near enough as good for similar shooting..but of course THAT is hardly as pocketable, and frankly I do NOT like quite a few things on the LX as far as shooting conditions are concerned.. it's a camera I feel you have to make work a lot moreso.

--
eric-UK
Staffordshire
 
First, the TS2 is an old model - the TS3 has been out for around a year, and is better. The folded optics are a trade-off - maybe some loss in image quality with the smaller internal optics, BUT there's nothing protruding from the front of the body that can get bumped/damaged when shooting in rough conditions. I've used this camera to shoot from a roller-coaster, with it bouncing against things as the car shook, to take photos and video of my family playing at the pool/beach while I was in the water. For something even simpler, I used it when we took our daughter back to the orphanage where she spent her first few years, taking photos of her walking around the building in the pouring rain, which I couldn't have done with a normal camera without it getting ruined by the rain. It comes back to why I chose this camera - I can use it under just about any conditions and not worry about it, and get shots (or video) that I couldn't have taken with any "normal" camera. Are these great shots that I'd print at 16x20? No. But they are shots that are important to me and my family.

Still, I'd love to buy an S100 and have that as an option for less challenging times.
--
Jeff Peterman

Any insults, implied anger, bad grammar and bad spelling, are entirely unintentionalal. Sorry.
http://www.pbase.com/jeffp25
http://www.jeffp25.smugmug.com

 
Out of curiosity, have you worked with an 4s ever ? I'm curious as to what your basing your comments on, because if I was only the user of my old 3gs for example, then I'd agree, or any flipphone etc, but I find it really amazing how far they have really come.

More so, the latest apps can really do some incredible things.

There are panoramic apps that work amazingly well, and actually allow one to stitch lots of separate images together and that far exceed the silly sweep pano on my NEX5 and X100.

Even more amazing they do this in camera/phone. No need to transfer to the PC later at home, but standing in the middle of a field you can product super high resolution panos

Or there is a great app called persepctives that does perspective correction automatically using the phones sensors. $0.99 and it does the same thing I do in photoshop yet automatically.

It also has an image stacking mode where it can take 16 or 32 etc images and layer them to average out the noise producing a perfectly clean file. Fantastic for landscape shooting

There are HDR apps that provide in depth control, apps to allow setting exposure, focus, WB etc all manually

interval timers, trap focus, etc

The creative potential really does go beyond what one can do with many simple compacts.

I previously would need a spherical pano rig costing hundreds of dollars, a computer and speical software costing hundreds of dollars to do a 360 pano

Now I can download a free app, photosynth and simply move my phone around, the app taking each image with the right overlap for me, then stitch that all together and on my phone I have a high resolution 360 pano I can zoom and pan around using just my finger, or upload to a site to share with family friends.

For free! And so quick and easy that anyone can do it.

Thats a real revolution in photography, whom can enjoy, and how they can enjoy it if you ask me
Now having said that - I'm NOT implying that it is so here.. but purely in a restricted area ...NOT quite the same as YOU have in mind I think - my original comment was , I do feel, justiable to some degree , as an iPhone is just quite NOT a camera.. and I still think that pics from ANY phone... good in general as they may be.. are just not comparable fully with what can be obtained from a "proper" camera of small and similar type.
--
eric-UK
Staffordshire
--
http://www.millsartphotography.com
 
Jeff-
Are these great shots that I'd print at 16x20? No. But they are shots that are important to me and my family.
.. and THAT is really what does matter isn't it. Those kind are hugely important.. and certainly NOT the ones that you necesarily need to be super-dSLR type quality..and they are kept as a personal record. I accept all you say about the camera in that respect Jeff. It's the ones that get openly shown.. and could be a lot better probably (in many instances) that I think should well be at least done by a 'proper' camera mostly.
But again - it's user-choice.. so who am I to disagree I suppose..

--
eric-UK
Staffordshire
 
To answer your very first question..the answer is "NO".. mainly because I really have no need for a phone of that type... but most of all because I have no need or desire to pay what is the equal of approximately $1,000 for such an instrument.. as THAT is the price they can be here in UK !!

But if they are so capable as you explain.. I wonder then why it is that we do not seem to be overwhelmed with a multitude and flow of wonderful results from it ??
Maybe you can correct this with a few samples to encourage ... ?

--
eric-UK
Staffordshire
 
But if they are so capable as you explain.. I wonder then why it is that we do not seem to be overwhelmed with a multitude and flow of wonderful results from it ??
Well, if you really want to be convinced, Eric, just surf on over to Flickr and type in iPhone 4S landscape, or street, or b&w, or any other variable you'd care to choose, and you'll be overwhelmed with some great (and many not so great) images. The iPhone has the largest number of images of any camera on Flickr now, and has held that distinction for some time. So you can be sure of finding some truly "wonderful results" among the detritus.

If you Google iPhone 4S vs. (insert camera name here), you'll get some interesting comparisons, some of which really show off the iPhone's capabilities.

But lets allow ourselves to be honest here, Eric. You have made it very plain in countless posts here that you have an abiding aversion to iPhones, or anything Apple produces for that matter. This thread is a good example. pdqgp posted a couple of humorous images of mislabeled produce, with no intention of showing off anything whatsoever about the phone's image quality. Just some funny pictures. But you couldn't resist the temptation to turn the thread into yet another one of your anti-Apple "discussions." Had pdqgp used a Nokia or Samsung instead, I doubt that we would have heard a word about it.

I'm sorry that you seem to find it so troubling that some people are perfectly happy to use their iPhones to capture images that delight them, and I daresay, others. If you go and take a look at what some talented photographers are doing with their iPhones, you may change your mind. But given your posting history here, I suspect that you won't allow yourself to do that.

David
--
It is impossible for a man to learn what he thinks he already knows
--Epictetus
 
David-

I'm sorry in many ways that you have to write this way.. I'm quite sure that you feel it has every justification.. but I have to say in all honesty on my part that I'm not totally prejudicial to Apple in the way you seem to believe. Isn't it allowable to have a personal feeling that such as Apple ( it could apply to anything else) IS in many ways very much inferior to certain others..I emphasise that this is in relation to certain aspects...where I just know that my feelings are just not totally my own. Cannot we each have at least some amount of disagreement with a manufacturer..it is quite a proven point in many ways.. if the Apple way suits you - or anyone - then of course you will rightly think that it is 'best'..it just isn't so to me.. and that is when I feel that whatever comment I make is certainly in order to that extent.

I really wonder these days if I am nowadays suited to participate in such as these Forums..I am in a different world to so many.. quite definitely I am sure, with many more years of experience than a good many 'regulars' on here now..but I suppose my era of experience, and probably the more dogmatic feelings that age brings.. are just way-out to many modern ways.

But at least I do have enough experience to explain in some way what views and feelings I do have.. it seems that it is alas in disagreement with many here.

I stand by most of what I say - even if it is my own feelings.. and BY experience, I now hesitate very much to even start to compare such as in this case any posted pics which you say are in abundance on Flickr etc... with any pics taken by what I regard as "proper" cameras.. indeed ANY pics really can depend such a lot on what has happened to them AFTER the point of taking... is it really the case that the 'workings' of such as iPhones or indeed any other phones, can be AS GOOD as what we nowadays have in top-grade cameras. ? astounding if that is so..

But as I started with.. I'm sorry if you think as you say.. I'm just trying to be honest in saying what I think myself.. anybody who disagrees of course is perfectly entitled to do so.

And as far as the original OP's pics are concerned.. I DID think that the few remarks added, were in some way a kind of appraisal of the origin.. as much as the 'contradictory' nature of the content.. coupled very likely with the fact that although I've seen similar many times...I just had one of those moments when I just had to put my foot in it and start all this...

But I still think that the majority of phone shooters do so simply for the enjoyment it gives 'instantly' in-hand..and THAT I do admire..seeing a lot of those moments ..AND 'live' content that you can get this way of course (live sport etc etc)...it is excellent for that.. but for general photo work ?? .. I'm sorry.. but I'll never think of them that way.

I'm just going to draw the line on this - it really isn't that important surely to start long arguments over what is relevantly an individual issue - and frankly one I wish I'd never got a bit hot-under-the-coillar about now !!

--
eric-UK
Staffordshire
 
Had pdqgp used a Nokia or Samsung instead, I doubt that we would have heard a word about it.
Actually, having communicated with Eric in some other discussions, this is nothing to do with an anti-Apple bias - he'd have the same concerns with photos from a Nokia and Samsung phone too. I think that Eric is just frustrated with seeing too many shots that people post and say "look at this great shot" when the photo is actually pretty poor.

In the context of this thread, photographically the two shots weren't very good (mostly a lighting issue, not the camera), and he jumped in based on the quality of the images and not on the subject EXCEPT that they captured something interesting that was worth recording. He had his phone with him, and not any other camera, so that's the one he used.
--
Jeff Peterman

Any insults, implied anger, bad grammar and bad spelling, are entirely unintentionalal. Sorry.
http://www.pbase.com/jeffp25
http://www.jeffp25.smugmug.com

 
Had pdqgp used a Nokia or Samsung instead, I doubt that we would have heard a word about it.
Actually, having communicated with Eric in some other discussions, this is nothing to do with an anti-Apple bias - he'd have the same concerns with photos from a Nokia and Samsung phone too.
I'll take your word for that, Jeff. But having read many of Eric's posts in this forum since its inception, that has not been my observation. When I repeatedly read Apple products described as "very much inferior" or similarly dismissed I have to wonder if we're discussing the same devices. And given the fact that Apple sold 37 million iPhones in the last quarter alone, how is it possible that this obvious inferiority has been overlooked by so many? Their marketing can't be that great.
I think that Eric is just frustrated with seeing too many shots that people post and say "look at this great shot" when the photo is actually pretty poor.
Fine, but 1) the OP never even came close to saying anything of the sort, and 2) this is a forum dedicated to photography using phone and tablet cameras. To be express frustration (at length) with their output and to compare them to "high-end" cameras here seems a little counterproductive to me. Wouldn't it be more interesting to focus on what they can do?

Eric, if you're reading this, I think it's just great that you prefer other products to the ones Apple offers. A competitive marketplace makes for better devices for all of us. I use and enjoy products from a number of electronics companies. But whatever it is that makes Apple's products very much inferior to competitive devices is lost on me, and many millions of others, apparently.

Perhaps it is my age showing here (I doubt that you have that many years on me, Eric), but I see no need to repeatedly run down the purchasing choices other people make, even if well-intentioned. For instance I don't see the closed environment Apple provides as a negative, I prefer it because it helps to protect my devices from untested and potentially damaging apps. Some other choices Apple has made fall equally in the plus column for me, but apparently seem nefarious to others. I have given those views consideration, just as I have read many of your reasons for preferring non-Apple products, Eric, and have not yet been persuaded by them. My perspective is just different from yours, not inferior. Fair enough?

David

--
It is impossible for a man to learn what he thinks he already knows
--Epictetus
 
In the context of this thread, photographically the two shots weren't very good (mostly a lighting issue, not the camera), and he jumped in based on the quality of the images and not on the subject EXCEPT that they captured something interesting that was worth recording. He had his phone with him, and not any other camera, so that's the one he used.
Just to clarify for you and everyone that the INTENT of my post was NOT about IQ of these shots. That's apparent, especially if you've seen other images I've taken overall.

The INTENT of my post was to poke fun a the actual content of the image as seen and commented on by my 8yr old son, which always makes me smile (seeing things through his eyes) that is. I posted here as YES it does show the fun that can be had and MEMORIES that can be captured. ie....the story behind the images, which is something the iPhone and other Cell Phones truly do excel at considering their prevalent use. Mine is with me at all times.

I'll be happy to take Eric up on a photo contest with my iPhone vs a P&S of their choice. The only limiting factor will be my getting away from work and home enough to shoot however, I have a vacation in Florida and a nice trip to NYC coming up in Feb and March so I will be sure to begin that contest regardless if he takes me up on it. ;) Look for images in the near future.
--
Jeff Peterman

Any insults, implied anger, bad grammar and bad spelling, are entirely unintentionalal. Sorry.
http://www.pbase.com/jeffp25
http://www.jeffp25.smugmug.com

--
  • tim
--

Note my new Screen Name has changed due to some privacy issues I was having to deal with, but I'm the same old long time member. Email or Message me anytime though.
 
--
  • tim
--

Note my new Screen Name has changed due to some privacy issues I was having to deal with, but I'm the same old long time member. Email or Message me anytime though.
 
But in this day, I'm afraid there ARE a lot who do buy some high-flying digital dSLR type.. which I just know from a few experiences they simply do not know how to use properly.. but because it is an expensive camera in their hands they do really seem to think that they are "photographers". And I see nowadays on these Forums such a lot of instances where this is obvious.. so I honestly have to say that on occasions I can't help but get niggled a bit by the use of what after all is really NOT a camera at all..then it is suddenly regarded as a kind of panacea for all.

Now having said that - I'm NOT implying that it is so here.. but purely in a restricted area ...NOT quite the same as YOU have in mind I think - my original comment was , I do feel, justiable to some degree , as an iPhone is just quite NOT a camera.. and I still think that pics from ANY phone... good in general as they may be.. are just not comparable fully with what can be obtained from a "proper" camera of small and similar type.

Your reply here I accept fully - although I do think it is extending the original post discussion far too much - it was never supposed to relate to that extent.. but it still basically is in relation to the potential of a 'real' camera of very similar carryability, to any sort of phone camera. The iPhone seems to be the one most often mentioned when this crops up.. although I'm sure there are other phones very much the equal to it if you want to use them to take a pic.

But ALL I really have in mind is NOT the comparison or even suggested usage of some expensive high-faluting posh proper camera... just simply my belief that a GOOD (as now we have them) pocket compact camera IS and always will be by far the better of any phone camera. Let's face it..they are MADE that way..an iPhone (or any similar) is a PHONE.. and THAT is only what I'm saying.

It may well be just my own firm opinion, but right or wrong in others eyes.. I stick to it...

Thanks for your input anyway..I agree vey much with most you say..although it is not quite totally relevant to the original thoughts expressed.
So would you be willing to put that to a test? I'll gladly participate in a comparison of what my iPhone 4s is capable of capturing vs your P&S and let the forum be the judge. Again, I have a couple trips coming up that will more than allow for me to capture some good stuff. I look forward to your willingness to participate and either you or I or someone else can start the thread.

Just note that I will likely not be out shooting until mid next week due to other commitments prior to my leaving.

--
  • tim
--

Note my new Screen Name has changed due to some privacy issues I was having to deal with, but I'm the same old long time member. Email or Message me anytime though.
 
Note that I didn't claim that Eric was unbiased towards Apple products, but that his answer would have been the same whether or not this was an Apple product - it was a comment about the images.

However, he has acknowledged somewhere in this long discussion that he missed the point of the post, and took the title of "What's wrong with these pictures" to be "What's wrong with the photographic quality of these pictures, aren't these images great!" rather than "What's wrong IN these pictures?"

And to be honest, based on the title, my initial thought was that the OP was very proud of some mediocre images - until I looked closer and saw the incongruities, then I understood he got the best images he could with the equipment and lighting at hand.
--
Jeff Peterman

Any insults, implied anger, bad grammar and bad spelling, are entirely unintentionalal. Sorry.
http://www.pbase.com/jeffp25
http://www.jeffp25.smugmug.com

 
Just to clarify for you and everyone that the INTENT of my post was NOT about IQ of these shots. That's apparent, especially if you've seen other images I've taken overall.
Oh, I fully appreciate that now. I didn't when I first saw the images, but didn't think they were worth my time. When I saw the thread grow and I took a second look and then realized why you had posted the images.
--
Jeff Peterman

Any insults, implied anger, bad grammar and bad spelling, are entirely unintentionalal. Sorry.
http://www.pbase.com/jeffp25
http://www.jeffp25.smugmug.com

 
I'm here.. but I'm afraid that this subject (topic) seems to have got a little fragmented and I have made a statement or two in some other post over this last day..

As I believe I said somewhere in these..I'm not going to make any attempt to COMPARE pics..as I just base all my feelings really on what I quite genuinely believe to be the case ...as I feel it in my own photo experience.. I just do not see that ANY phone - however excellent it may be..and I do agreee..such as the iPhone IS very good (although that should not take away anything from a few OTHER phones..which by all accounts are very good indeed in more recent versions.. ) but I just honestly feel that all this excitement of taking pics with phones is simply against the grain to me. A CAMERA is what people have used , lived with and LEARNED from.. for all my photographic days.. and however good a phone - iPhone or any other - may be.. surely it truly cannot be compared with the use of and the LEANING that a serious photo enthusiast gets from a proper camera. Nor indeed is it (in my eyes anyway) even a possibility that people can learn proper photographic skills from the continued use of a phone to take pictures.

It's easy to say that "times are changing"..they're NOT really.. or how do you think such as the top-line smaller cameras or certainly the dSLR type , are ever going to survive. THAT to me is the best and maybe only way to learn photography - IF you have any real interest in it.

I cannot help but wonder..and say.. that the definitely improving phone-camera facilities are in many ways making a lot of people what I might call "lazy photographers" ..as it IS so easy to grab pics that way..instead of carrying a "proper" camera and learning to use it, then progressiing to better ones..the way that I and many others certainly have done.

I think (I have no figures on this - just comon-sense appraisal) - that most of the camera-phone users are very much in the younger years.. few I'm sure of the golden years..or even just late-age years.. I think place as much reliance on a camera to take pics as they do on the tried, tested and trusted, REAL cameras. Is this inded just what it is about.. us 'old-uns' do find it difficult to make material changes such as this... but is it also maybe, that we just don't see the camera-phone in the same light ??

Coming directly the those couple of apple-pics you posted to start this one.. frankly..I simply have to say that again.. they ARE good.. but honestly.. I can see a lot better clarity and IQ if it was shot on a really good but carryable CAMERA of MY type... !! Sorry but I just see it that way.. a LOT of years of camera usage (all sorts) and a striving always for what at least I try to get as "best I can" ...

As I said in another post - let's draw the line on this - it was never intended to be a serious comparison this way - but just a personal statement that to my eyes and feelings anyway - I just prefer a CAMERA..to a PHONE ...

Do true professionals regularly use camera-phones to take their pictures - I doubt it.. Good as the iPhone and others may be.. it is still not the best way to gather all that you can in photographic experience ...OR maybe the added pleasure from learning a few other skills from such as Photoshop or whatever similar.

--
eric-UK
Staffordshire
 
however good a phone - iPhone or any other - may be.. surely it truly cannot be compared with the use of and the LEANING that a serious photo enthusiast gets from a proper camera.
I'll agree that to properly learn photography one would need to be able to control far more variables than a simple phone would allow, however, phones and a majority of P&S Cameras suffer from some of the same limitation, most noticeably being DOF.

My son is only 8 and he's done quite well with P&S Cameras and where needed I work with him to discuss what he might consider good processing techniques, such as adding DOF or B&W Conversions. However all that said, a phone and a camera will ABSOLUTELY enable someone to learn composition, subject matter and even a good understanding of lighting and working within the limitations of what they have to remain creative.
It's easy to say that "times are changing"..they're NOT really.. or how do you think such as the top-line smaller cameras or certainly the dSLR type , are ever going to survive.
Personally I am putting money on multifunction devices continuing to cut into small pocket and P&S Cameras. That's one of the reasons why I think you're seeing manufacturers trying to differentiate themselves and the gear by introducing so many bridge cameras, mirror less cameras, etc...they see the writing on the wall about simple P&S. It's not the only reason, but it's a big one.
I cannot help but wonder..and say.. that the definitely improving phone-camera facilities are in many ways making a lot of people what I might call "lazy photographers"
I would say the opposite. I don't think many people with "interests" in a hobby become lazy at it. People don't typically become lazy at something they enjoy, they move onto something new. If anything, I think it's turning people who are normally were "interested" in photography are becoming more interested and aware of the enjoyment that comes from it.

Again, I don't think you see folks like me who shoot primarily with a dSLR for both fun and work put it down and use a phone. Actually, I would bet you see more people begin using their phone, look for more capability and outgrow it thus adding a nicer camera.
I think (I have no figures on this - just comon-sense appraisal) - that most of the camera-phone users are very much in the younger years.. few I'm sure of the golden years..or even just late-age years.
I agree but as you noted earlier, I think it has a lot to do with a multi-use need or desire. My parents in their 70-80's have zero need outside an emergency to have cell phone period, thus will never buy one even if it has a great camera. Others who do have a need or desire to carry a phone tend to carry one and show strong interest in ones that can do video and shoot pics. I don't think any stats are needed to see that.
Coming directly the those couple of apple-pics you posted to start this one.. frankly..I simply have to say that again.. they ARE good.. but honestly.. I can see a lot better clarity and IQ if it was shot on a really good but carryable CAMERA of MY type... !! Sorry but I just see it that way.. a LOT of years of camera usage (all sorts) and a striving always for what at least I try to get as "best I can" ...
Then it will be interesting to see your thoughts on my upcoming pics as to whether you can pic out an iPhone 4s vs a P&S vs a dSLR when I post them up in the coming weeks.

I'll grant you the right not to participate in the comparison, but that said, I would say I do have an expectation that given your keen eye, you might perhaps participate in my comparison study.
As I said in another post - let's draw the line on this - it was never intended to be a serious comparison this way - but just a personal statement that to my eyes and feelings anyway - I just prefer a CAMERA..to a PHONE ...
Fair enough and no worries. I never felt any ill feelings or will with your comments, nor did/do I intend any in return. I am however, always up for a contest/debate or robust discussion on topics that interest me.
Do true professionals regularly use camera-phones to take their pictures - I doubt it.. Good as the iPhone and others may be.. it is still not the best way to gather all that you can in photographic experience ...OR maybe the added pleasure from learning a few other skills from such as Photoshop or whatever similar.
I agree that those that earn a living don't likely use a phone to do their work, no different than race car drivers don't likely take their family sports car to their job either. However, just the same, they both enjoy their respective hardware to the fullest extent.

Just as the wedding photographer may use an iPhone to capture his kids at the zoo and lend a creative eye and knowledge to capture that memory and story; the race car driver / enthusiast no doubt enjoys carving out the twisty roads with his very capable, although not pro-level vehicle, by also applying his skills and talents to make the most of the moment they are in.

In both situations above it boils down to the person and their capabilities / skills far more than it does to the hardware. Thus the reason why I'm 100% confident that my abilities to participate in a contest using an iPhone where perhaps maybe, just maybe, someday, you'll decide to join in with the P&S of your choice.

Thanks for the continued discussion. I look forward to more robust dialog on the subject in the near future.

--
  • tim
--

Note my new Screen Name has changed due to some privacy issues I was having to deal with, but I'm the same old long time member. Email or Message me anytime though.
 
tim-

Nice reply and one that I appreciate...it's at least I think (hope) cleared the air a bit..

To be honest - I suppose that my own thoughts and feelings are just a sort of natural thing..to me..as I come into that "old-age".. e.g your parents category !!..and a bit more perhaps !!!!! So perhaps I have to accept that I have a sort of fixed way of thinking...what I have been brought up with or gone through for a very long time. It's always difficult in old years to adapt or even to accept new things... we learn as we have done for a lifetime, and find it more difficult to accept totally new things - although I hope that I'm being true to myself in saying that I am more than grateful to "those up there" that I still have some decent faculties and still enjoy most of my old hobbies.

I'm realy not able..maybe not enough interested .. in having to learn new things when I feel I can do what I want in the "old" way that I've learned well and truly.

But harping again briefly to that Apple business..I did (wrongly maybe ??) get an idea at one stage that you believed me to be sort of anti-Apple totally.. I have said it before...I'm NOT that.. but I AM anti- against a lot of things that Apple do and the way they do them. It started with my buying an iPod Touch 3 some few years ago. I've got "loads" of things on that..but as I'm sure you well know..you HAVE to have iTunes...AND of course you register on that..what is in fact..a kind of 'closed-shop' registration, as it appears that you have great difficuty in getting a sort of total independance with the iPod you register with..and its contents. My Daughter had trouible in that respect..trying in vain to swap just a selection of titles from another iPod.. anyway at that time I found another program that gave me total control over mine, and it has worked very well for me since. I know a lot of others have the same trouble.. then came the iPads..and again..Apple of course do make such a lot of limitations. .believe me..I spoke with a pro-camera man just a week or two ago and HE said exactly the same over Tablets.. he did not want to go to an iPad for the very reason that for all its goodness (yes they are good) but they are equally very restrictive - at least compared to most or many others on Android.

Again of course it all comes down to personal desires..if a thing suits you better ..go for it... no matter what it's called.. and that I guess is life really.. we each have our likes and dislikes..

It's nice in many ways to have chances like these Forums to talk of thngs..but again over MANY years..I do find that conversations on paper are SO easily misunderstood and lead sometimes to unwanted differences.. I hope this business is somehat more settled.. I don't think I'll rake over the coals with any more on your upcoming project if you don't mind.. I'm sure my own thoughts might well upset some others again..in spite of good intentions..
Regards -
Eric

--
eric-UK
Staffordshire
 
Nice reply and one that I appreciate...it's at least I think (hope) cleared the air a bit..
Yes, but honestly, there was no air to clear so to speak. All in good fun and debate.
It's nice in many ways to have chances like these Forums to talk of thngs..but again over MANY years..I do find that conversations on paper are SO easily misunderstood and lead sometimes to unwanted differences.. I hope this business is somehat more settled.. I don't think I'll rake over the coals with any more on your upcoming project if you don't mind.. I'm sure my own thoughts might well upset some others again..in spite of good intentions..
Nothing but good intentions were received. I do agree conversations that are text only come across rough at times, but I wouldn't worry much about how things were taken. I haven't read anything that would yield ill feelings. If others seem to go that route, it's on them not you.

Enjoy the week!

--
  • tim
--

Note my new Screen Name has changed due to some privacy issues I was having to deal with, but I'm the same old long time member. Email or Message me anytime though.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top