That 5dc or "classic" is absolute nonsense; why? Because it is at least for a while needlessly confusing for people when they first see it (e.g. did they mistype? do they actually mean 5d2 or just 5d?, etc..)He intentionally find fault with this 5Dc name, not just once in this thread but many times in many different threads. He has a crusade to fight on 5D and 5D2.
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1032&message=39703361
Sounds familiar? If you search you can find more to show he is so obsessed with this name - Classic that he simply cannot swallow.
I cannot read Fuzzy's mind. Does he ever tired? He really needs to check with a doctor ASAP because he is so mad on 5D/5D2. What's wrong with this guy?
A common name for the original 5D on this forum.I've never heard of a 5D "Classic"Beats 7D for general IQ.
For heavens sakes, this isn't nursery school- the camera has a name. 5d. There isn't a 5dc, "classic" or whatever else you want to call it. Yes, I know there are "pet" names fort lenses etc., but usually smart people will specifically state what they're talking about before adding the pet name (e.g. 14-24, 24-70, 70-200 "holy trinity").
A lens that is exceptionally heavy or large can reasonably have a pet name but a freak'n 5d? Are you kidding me? Sheesh people. I didn't know what in the world people were talking about when I first saw 5dc and had to waste time going down the thread trying to figure out what in the world I had missed in the Canon lineup (obviously I'm not the only one).
Keep it simple. The camera has a name, and for the sake of being grown up... use it.
I think the 5d2 is better IQ wise over the 7d in most cases as someone already stated.
--
Teila K. Day