Overated primes II

Thanks for the very sensible reply. So refreshing to hear from someone with an open unbiased mind and not a lecture.
Unbiased, not really.

It may have been said up topic already - primes also help one to see outside one's comfort zone. If you don't have the right focal length for what is in front of you, still making something of the subject takes some determination often enough. What results may fail, or it may open up a perspective that wouldn't otherwise be considered.

What I like about these two compositions regards limiting myself to two primes. If I mounted a zoom I would never have quite seen this area and captured it quite this way. They may not bring fame and fortune, but the exercise is not lost on seeing future scenes with a broader consideration of possibility - no matter what lens(es) are on hand when that something presents itself. I may even return to both sites again with the same perspectives in mind, to see if they can be done one better.









--
...Bob, NYC
http://www.bobtullis.com

"Well, sometimes the magic works. . . Sometimes, it doesn't." - Little Big Man
.
 
Thanks for the very sensible reply. So refreshing to hear from someone with an open unbiased mind and not a lecture.
Unbiased, not really.

It may have been said up topic already - primes also help one to see outside one's comfort zone. If you don't have the right focal length for what is in front of you, still making something of the subject takes some determination often enough. What results may fail, or it may open up a perspective that wouldn't otherwise be considered.

What I like about these two compositions regards limiting myself to two primes. If I mounted a zoom I would never have quite seen this area and captured it quite this way. They may not bring fame and fortune, but the exercise is not lost on seeing future scenes with a broader consideration of possibility - no matter what lens(es) are on hand when that something presents itself. I may even return to both sites again with the same perspectives in mind, to see if they can be done one better.









--
...Bob, NYC
http://www.bobtullis.com

"Well, sometimes the magic works. . . Sometimes, it doesn't." - Little Big Man
.
is that it is common for photography teachers (at least in the 70's)to force students to shoot with diffferent single focal lenghts for asingle assignement. The purpose was to force the student to "see" in different focal lenghts. You could do that with a zoom bet it would take a lot of self discipline.

Anyway, it was the training that made you "see" thigs in different focal lenghts so that you could select the right one.

Same thing applies today.

Jere notwithstanding.

Hope he enjoyed my lecture.

TEdolph
 
OK, OK...uh... I'll revise it to read "Zooming in on Tedolph's comments proves he's in the prime of his disagreement."
Much better.

Thank you.

TEdolph
 
Thanks for the very sensible reply. So refreshing to hear from someone with an open unbiased mind and not a lecture.
Unbiased, not really.

It may have been said up topic already - primes also help one to see outside one's comfort zone. If you don't have the right focal length for what is in front of you, still making something of the subject takes some determination often enough. What results may fail, or it may open up a perspective that wouldn't otherwise be considered.

What I like about these two compositions regards limiting myself to two primes. If I mounted a zoom I would never have quite seen this area and captured it quite this way. They may not bring fame and fortune, but the exercise is not lost on seeing future scenes with a broader consideration of possibility - no matter what lens(es) are on hand when that something presents itself. I may even return to both sites again with the same perspectives in mind, to see if they can be done one better.









--
...Bob, NYC
http://www.bobtullis.com

"Well, sometimes the magic works. . . Sometimes, it doesn't." - Little Big Man
.
is that it is common for photography teachers (at least in the 70's)to force students to shoot with diffferent single focal lenghts for asingle assignement. The purpose was to force the student to "see" in different focal lenghts. You could do that with a zoom bet it would take a lot of self discipline.

Anyway, it was the training that made you "see" thigs in different focal lenghts so that you could select the right one.

Same thing applies today.
No, TEdolph, there are too many variables. This could well apply to others replies here. Opportunity, light, ability and aesthetics to name a few...
Jere notwithstanding.

Hope he enjoyed my lecture.

TEdolph
--



Eternity was in that moment.
 
MR T is always looking for more fight! Once and again I do agree with him and he does know a thing or to or he would have no move fight. But he has no real purpose but the more fight.

Sometimes he or she (i'm not sure) does keep threads alive way past any reasonable reason. I did have MR T in my ignore list but took him out because? Dam maybe I need to get a life!
unless you are looking for more fight.

--
rrr_hhh
--
john
my equipment is in Gear List
if you live near me you can test any of it...just e-mail
 
Who pulled your chain?

Tedolf does not need a chain to be pulled! I think Tedolf would agree with me on this.
--
john
my equipment is in Gear List
if you live near me you can test any of it...just e-mail
 
Zooming in on Tedolph's comments proves he's in the prime of his insufferable wit.
Tedolf does have some Wit regardless of what you think of the person. Hell I would like to met Tedolf. Tedolf has contributed A lot to this forum and is knowledgeable.

--
john
my equipment is in Gear List
if you live near me you can test any of it...just e-mail
 
People, please stop discussing, especially troll threads, and GTFO there and do some imagery instead. This place is sucking the soul out of you.
 
............ If I mounted a zoom I would never have quite seen this area and captured it quite this way..................
No, the idea is to look at the scene with your eyes and visualise the image that you want, then zoom or choose the appropriate prime (and maybe walk a bit or crop later) to accommodate your visualisation.

Regards.......... Guy
 
............ If I mounted a zoom I would never have quite seen this area and captured it quite this way..................
No, the idea is to look at the scene with your eyes and visualise the image that you want, then zoom or choose the appropriate prime (and maybe walk a bit or crop later) to accommodate your visualization.
Yes, to execute one's vision that is the recommended practice. But I'm still a student as well, and need to practice the scales and nursery rhymes regularly too. ;)

--
...Bob, NYC
http://www.bobtullis.com

"Well, sometimes the magic works. . . Sometimes, it doesn't." - Little Big Man
.
 
I'm saying I can see the shot and put the right camera to my eye faster than I can get the correct zoom while I'm trying to frame the shot. Alternatively, I suppose I could accomplish the same thing by getting to know very well the two extremes of a zoom, so I could quickly, without having to look, zoom to the widest and to the longest ends while I'm bringing my camera to my eye to capture the shot.
 
It seems pretty clear from your original posts and your comments that you have not actually experimented at any great length with the technique I have described (that is, shot with one or two focal lengths only for weeks or months at a time), and so you don't know the experience of being able to put camera to eye, immediately match it to your mental image of the shot because a particular focal length is imprinted in your brain, and snap the shutter.

It's a very different experience from what I mostly do now, because I am mostly using zooms, which is see the approximate shot, tweak the zoom to frame it, and then snap the shutter. Instead of thinking, "I wonder if the people who say this have something worth trying," and trying it, you simply dismiss it because it is outside your experience. You don't need primes to learn to see this way, you just need practice. It's fine if it doesn't interest you, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist, nor does it make people like me "fanboys" of shooting this way or of primes any more than you are a "fanboy" of zooms. (Although maybe you are a fanboy of zooms?)
More often than not, the quality of a prime shot, as described by so called "prime shooters" refers to sharpness and lack of certain abberations instead of depth of field control, perspective, and composition. Most here, who seem to be prime fanboys, seem to think it's so easy to draw the camera to the eye and snap a perfectly framed photo quickly. I think most photogs who do much shooting know better. Cropping usually comes into play, which causes you to lose quality in the final photo. The question is, does the quality loss cause you to lose what you gained by the prime in the first place?
 
I think it goes for most people who shoot a lot who at some point in their lives shot at single focal lengths. For people who grew up only on zooms, I don't think that's the case. I know that seeing in my mind's eye a particular focal length has faded considerably since I stopped shooting primes a few years back. I think it will come back now that I am starting to shoot with the 20 1.7 and 45 1.8.
 
People who want primes should buy primes. People who want zooms should buy zooms. Your camera is not a personal statement. Photos are a personal statement. Your camera is a tool. I like to use primes except when I don't, and then I use a zoom. It baffles me that people take this stuff personally.
EXACTLY!
I use both primes and zooms. They each have their place. Why limit your options???
You're being entirely too reasonable about this. Overated primes II finally made it to DVD.

Let's max this mutha out so Jere can bring us ...
Overated primes III: Return of the Zoomers
This made me laugh.

Will there be special "Director's Edition" with a section called, "Jere Landis Talks About Himself"?
No, that's only on the Special Platinum Limited Blu-ray Edition.
It's proper title is, "Prime Zoomer: Jere Landis on Jere Landis" .

Jere, I hope you know this is all in jest. If it helps, you can list me in the credits as Apprentice Manual Focus Follower Intern.
--
http://453c.smugmug.com/
 
I've read this whole thing now, both the original and the sequel and I have to say I'm fascinated by the social dynamics. I can't help but throw in my take on the matter. With regard to the original topic, I've seen two points of view that seem pretty valid.
Wow! You've got more patience than most, or you're a firefighter waiting for a call.
1)If you shoot often in low light conditions, or require shallow depth of field, there is no substitute for fast glass and fast primes are the best if not the only way to get this type of performance. So for those that need them, fast primes are not overrated.
That'd be me. After suffering with the kit lens, I always want at least one fast lens in my bag so I have a way to shoot in more challenging light. As sensors improve, this might not be so critical, but with my E-PL1, it's a requirement for me .
2) If you bought fast primes because they look awesome and cost a lot and you just feel that they will impart some ineffable magical quality to your photographs, you are bound to be disappointed and for you these lenses will seem overrated.
Agreed.
There seem to be a number of posters in this thread who are really overemphasizing the prevalence of those that fall into category two. My take is that most people who buy fast primes know why they are buying them and are capable of using them effectively.
OTOH, why does it matter to anyone if the Category 2 folks buy lenses? I figure it's more MFT glass going out the door, so that's good for everyone. Now, if someone is whining that they simply can't get a good photo with an ineffable, magical quality after spending a bunch of money on primes, that's another matter.
Now... and I've found this to be far more interesting... I think that what got the OP's feathers ruffled in the first place was tedolph pointing out his misunderstanding of a fundamental aspect of good shot composition. Frankly, this was a non sequitur and has nothing to do with the relative merit of primes vs. zooms. I thought it was a good point to make, though, and I think the OP would benefit from considering what point he was trying to make.

Basically, he was saying that there's more to good composition than framing. Think about two approaches to composing a particular shot. First you set your zoom to 14mm and frame so that the subject's face comprises about a third of the width of the frame. Take the shot. Then set your zoom to 45mm and walk backwards until again, the subject's face comprises about a third of the width of the frame. These won't be equivalent compositions! In the first the subject will appear larger relative to the environment, this can give the observer a feeling of relative insignificance. In the second shot, much less of the environment is visible in the frame. It can give more of a sense of intimacy... that the observer is occupying the same space as the subject. I'm a novice and certainly not an artist and there are certainly other ways to use angle of view and perspective in composing a shot. The point is that there is more to an artful composition than simple framing, and a skillful photographer, whether using a zoom or a prime lens, will choose a focal length with an understanding of the resultant angle of view and how it effects the composition, and not just to achieve a particular frame or field of view.
Carl, I think what you're saying is,

"He is intelligent, but not experienced. His pattern indicates two-dimensional thinking."
--
http://453c.smugmug.com/
 
............ If I mounted a zoom I would never have quite seen this area and captured it quite this way..................
No, the idea is to look at the scene with your eyes and visualise the image that you want, then zoom or choose the appropriate prime (and maybe walk a bit or crop later) to accommodate your visualization.
Yes, to execute one's vision that is the recommended practice. But I'm still a student as well, and need to practice the scales and nursery rhymes regularly too. ;)
Guy, I agree that's the final goal of such practice, but compared to Bob, I'm still learning the alphabet. I understand some of the basics we're discussing, but putting them into practice is a much more hit or miss affair for me.

Discussions like this have actually given some meaning to this sequel, so it's not a complete waste of time. These topics make me think a bit more about what I'm trying to do, and how I might get there.

I'm still looking forward to Return of the Zoomers, though.
--
http://453c.smugmug.com/
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top