clengman
Veteran Member
Who says!True, but it was very boring.Whereas what you did in style informs and explains as well as supporting the players and discussion as a whole.
Nothing there to stir men's souls.
-Carl the Humorless
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who says!True, but it was very boring.Whereas what you did in style informs and explains as well as supporting the players and discussion as a whole.
Nothing there to stir men's souls.
Unbiased, not really.Thanks for the very sensible reply. So refreshing to hear from someone with an open unbiased mind and not a lecture.
is that it is common for photography teachers (at least in the 70's)to force students to shoot with diffferent single focal lenghts for asingle assignement. The purpose was to force the student to "see" in different focal lenghts. You could do that with a zoom bet it would take a lot of self discipline.Unbiased, not really.Thanks for the very sensible reply. So refreshing to hear from someone with an open unbiased mind and not a lecture.
It may have been said up topic already - primes also help one to see outside one's comfort zone. If you don't have the right focal length for what is in front of you, still making something of the subject takes some determination often enough. What results may fail, or it may open up a perspective that wouldn't otherwise be considered.
What I like about these two compositions regards limiting myself to two primes. If I mounted a zoom I would never have quite seen this area and captured it quite this way. They may not bring fame and fortune, but the exercise is not lost on seeing future scenes with a broader consideration of possibility - no matter what lens(es) are on hand when that something presents itself. I may even return to both sites again with the same perspectives in mind, to see if they can be done one better.
![]()
![]()
--
...Bob, NYC
http://www.bobtullis.com
"Well, sometimes the magic works. . . Sometimes, it doesn't." - Little Big Man
.
Who do you think says?Who says!True, but it was very boring.Whereas what you did in style informs and explains as well as supporting the players and discussion as a whole.
Nothing there to stir men's souls.
-Carl the Humorless
Much better.OK, OK...uh... I'll revise it to read "Zooming in on Tedolph's comments proves he's in the prime of his disagreement."
No, TEdolph, there are too many variables. This could well apply to others replies here. Opportunity, light, ability and aesthetics to name a few...is that it is common for photography teachers (at least in the 70's)to force students to shoot with diffferent single focal lenghts for asingle assignement. The purpose was to force the student to "see" in different focal lenghts. You could do that with a zoom bet it would take a lot of self discipline.Unbiased, not really.Thanks for the very sensible reply. So refreshing to hear from someone with an open unbiased mind and not a lecture.
It may have been said up topic already - primes also help one to see outside one's comfort zone. If you don't have the right focal length for what is in front of you, still making something of the subject takes some determination often enough. What results may fail, or it may open up a perspective that wouldn't otherwise be considered.
What I like about these two compositions regards limiting myself to two primes. If I mounted a zoom I would never have quite seen this area and captured it quite this way. They may not bring fame and fortune, but the exercise is not lost on seeing future scenes with a broader consideration of possibility - no matter what lens(es) are on hand when that something presents itself. I may even return to both sites again with the same perspectives in mind, to see if they can be done one better.
![]()
![]()
--
...Bob, NYC
http://www.bobtullis.com
"Well, sometimes the magic works. . . Sometimes, it doesn't." - Little Big Man
.
Anyway, it was the training that made you "see" thigs in different focal lenghts so that you could select the right one.
Same thing applies today.
--Jere notwithstanding.
Hope he enjoyed my lecture.
TEdolph
--unless you are looking for more fight.
--
rrr_hhh
Tedolf does have some Wit regardless of what you think of the person. Hell I would like to met Tedolf. Tedolf has contributed A lot to this forum and is knowledgeable.Zooming in on Tedolph's comments proves he's in the prime of his insufferable wit.
No, the idea is to look at the scene with your eyes and visualise the image that you want, then zoom or choose the appropriate prime (and maybe walk a bit or crop later) to accommodate your visualisation............. If I mounted a zoom I would never have quite seen this area and captured it quite this way..................
Yes, to execute one's vision that is the recommended practice. But I'm still a student as well, and need to practice the scales and nursery rhymes regularly too.No, the idea is to look at the scene with your eyes and visualise the image that you want, then zoom or choose the appropriate prime (and maybe walk a bit or crop later) to accommodate your visualization............. If I mounted a zoom I would never have quite seen this area and captured it quite this way..................
More often than not, the quality of a prime shot, as described by so called "prime shooters" refers to sharpness and lack of certain abberations instead of depth of field control, perspective, and composition. Most here, who seem to be prime fanboys, seem to think it's so easy to draw the camera to the eye and snap a perfectly framed photo quickly. I think most photogs who do much shooting know better. Cropping usually comes into play, which causes you to lose quality in the final photo. The question is, does the quality loss cause you to lose what you gained by the prime in the first place?
No, that's only on the Special Platinum Limited Blu-ray Edition.This made me laugh.You're being entirely too reasonable about this. Overated primes II finally made it to DVD.EXACTLY!People who want primes should buy primes. People who want zooms should buy zooms. Your camera is not a personal statement. Photos are a personal statement. Your camera is a tool. I like to use primes except when I don't, and then I use a zoom. It baffles me that people take this stuff personally.
I use both primes and zooms. They each have their place. Why limit your options???
Let's max this mutha out so Jere can bring us ...
Overated primes III: Return of the Zoomers
Will there be special "Director's Edition" with a section called, "Jere Landis Talks About Himself"?
Wow! You've got more patience than most, or you're a firefighter waiting for a call.I've read this whole thing now, both the original and the sequel and I have to say I'm fascinated by the social dynamics. I can't help but throw in my take on the matter. With regard to the original topic, I've seen two points of view that seem pretty valid.
That'd be me. After suffering with the kit lens, I always want at least one fast lens in my bag so I have a way to shoot in more challenging light. As sensors improve, this might not be so critical, but with my E-PL1, it's a requirement for me .1)If you shoot often in low light conditions, or require shallow depth of field, there is no substitute for fast glass and fast primes are the best if not the only way to get this type of performance. So for those that need them, fast primes are not overrated.
Agreed.2) If you bought fast primes because they look awesome and cost a lot and you just feel that they will impart some ineffable magical quality to your photographs, you are bound to be disappointed and for you these lenses will seem overrated.
OTOH, why does it matter to anyone if the Category 2 folks buy lenses? I figure it's more MFT glass going out the door, so that's good for everyone. Now, if someone is whining that they simply can't get a good photo with an ineffable, magical quality after spending a bunch of money on primes, that's another matter.There seem to be a number of posters in this thread who are really overemphasizing the prevalence of those that fall into category two. My take is that most people who buy fast primes know why they are buying them and are capable of using them effectively.
Carl, I think what you're saying is,Now... and I've found this to be far more interesting... I think that what got the OP's feathers ruffled in the first place was tedolph pointing out his misunderstanding of a fundamental aspect of good shot composition. Frankly, this was a non sequitur and has nothing to do with the relative merit of primes vs. zooms. I thought it was a good point to make, though, and I think the OP would benefit from considering what point he was trying to make.
Basically, he was saying that there's more to good composition than framing. Think about two approaches to composing a particular shot. First you set your zoom to 14mm and frame so that the subject's face comprises about a third of the width of the frame. Take the shot. Then set your zoom to 45mm and walk backwards until again, the subject's face comprises about a third of the width of the frame. These won't be equivalent compositions! In the first the subject will appear larger relative to the environment, this can give the observer a feeling of relative insignificance. In the second shot, much less of the environment is visible in the frame. It can give more of a sense of intimacy... that the observer is occupying the same space as the subject. I'm a novice and certainly not an artist and there are certainly other ways to use angle of view and perspective in composing a shot. The point is that there is more to an artful composition than simple framing, and a skillful photographer, whether using a zoom or a prime lens, will choose a focal length with an understanding of the resultant angle of view and how it effects the composition, and not just to achieve a particular frame or field of view.
--People, please stop discussing, especially troll threads, and GTFO there and do some imagery instead. This place is sucking the soul out of you.
Guy, I agree that's the final goal of such practice, but compared to Bob, I'm still learning the alphabet. I understand some of the basics we're discussing, but putting them into practice is a much more hit or miss affair for me.Yes, to execute one's vision that is the recommended practice. But I'm still a student as well, and need to practice the scales and nursery rhymes regularly too.No, the idea is to look at the scene with your eyes and visualise the image that you want, then zoom or choose the appropriate prime (and maybe walk a bit or crop later) to accommodate your visualization............. If I mounted a zoom I would never have quite seen this area and captured it quite this way..................![]()
--People, please stop discussing, especially troll threads, and GTFO there and do some imagery instead. This place is sucking the soul out of you.