Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Additional advantage of SLT which comes to mind is the fact that there is no issue with mirror slap and the resultant vibrations which theoretically improves IQ especially when shooting at faster frame rates. Additionally the continuous AF and fact that you don't have a mirror flipping up and down is conducive to allowing faster frame rates, however whether or not this is an advantage for you depends on your style of shooting.I'm debating of upgrading from the A700, but so far the advantages of an SLT camera is for video and live view. However, in terms of photography and image quality, is there any?
Don't quite agree. There are many tools that help you get more keepers, and resoultion is also much higher. Here are some images that demonstrates manual focusing with the A700 OVF vs the A77 magnified view. The A77 image is downscaled to the same size at the A77 files, which are 100 % crops:No real advantage in IQ but advantages in speed and AF.
That is a good point, but practical-wise it makes no difference to me when the body is image stabilized. I'm not a sports shooter so higher FPS is not a priority for me. Responsiveness yes, the EVF may be laggy in low light conditions which is a concern, but frame rates are not really important for me.Additional advantage of SLT which comes to mind is the fact that there is no issue with mirror slap and the resultant vibrations which theoretically improves IQ especially when shooting at faster frame rates. Additionally the continuous AF and fact that you don't have a mirror flipping up and down is conducive to allowing faster frame rates, however whether or not this is an advantage for you depends on your style of shooting.
True, but those features are probably going to go obsolete fast. I'm an available light and low-light photographer so most of those features (3D, panorama, GPS) I find really gimmicky.Bare in mind too that the latest SLTs (especially the A77) are an evolutionary improvement over Sony's earlier SLRs in many ways, regardless of whether or not they are SLT e.g. faster overall operation, higher-res LCD, GPS, features such as sweep panorama. And even though the SLTs are not the best for low light / high ISO (though they aren't nearly as bad as some repetitive posters will have you believe) they are still a significant improvement over the A700 - again just a result of evolution in low light capabilities over the past few years across the Sony range.
How is that so? As far as I know the A700 also use phase detection. Manual focusing is probably better with an OVF because of its infinite resolution, whereas EVF is limited by the number of pixels.
- Much better tools for critical manual focusing
- Faster and more reliable autofocus
EVF lag is problem for me when shooting action with the A77, and no problem when photographing indoor when low light.I don't really know if speed is really an advantage with EVF because EVF are laggy in less than ideal conditions when compared to OVF.
The A77 evf is clearly better for manual focusing than the A700 small and dim ovf.How is that so? As far as I know the A700 also use phase detection. Manual focusing is probably better with an OVF because of its infinite resolution, whereas EVF is limited by the number of pixels.
- Much better tools for critical manual focusing
- Faster and more reliable autofocus
Ah, but you can also do this via the rear screen of a DSLR with live view. It works very well, and you keep the option of using an optical finder. You'd get the advantages of an EVF (manual focusing aids, exposure preview for JPGs, flexible information overlay) whenever you want, and the advantages of an optical finder (infinite resolution, no lag, much lower power consumption) whenever you want.Then you can use "peaking" for even better focus control, and loupe view for a magnified view. Works very well handheld, and is excellent for ultra-critical focusing.
I've been looking for a while but I haven't been able to find anything saying that the a55 and a65 autofocus better than the a580. Theoretically the a55/65 should have an advantage, but I haven't seen any controlled tests (or even anecdotal evidence).With SLT design the autofocus works continious, also when the shutter is open.
Anything but infinite resolution, especially with the DSLR's optimized for (fast) LV, which I wouldn't recommend as a replacement to anyone used to a larg(er) and bright(er) OVF.Ah, but you can also do this via the rear screen of a DSLR with live view. It works very well, and you keep the option of using an optical finder. You'd get the advantages of an EVF (manual focusing aids, exposure preview for JPGs, flexible information overlay) whenever you want, and the advantages of an optical finder (infinite resolution, no lag, much lower power consumption) whenever you want.Then you can use "peaking" for even better focus control, and loupe view for a magnified view. Works very well handheld, and is excellent for ultra-critical focusing.
Ah, but you can also do this via the rear screen of a DSLR with live view. It works very well, and you keep the option of using an optical finder. You'd get the advantages of an EVF (manual focusing aids, exposure preview for JPGs, flexible information overlay) whenever you want, and the advantages of an optical finder (infinite resolution, no lag, much lower power consumption) whenever you want.Then you can use "peaking" for even better focus control, and loupe view for a magnified view. Works very well handheld, and is excellent for ultra-critical focusing.
??? Please elaborate. The SLT's do have flexible swivel screens.I previously hoped that the new Alpha cameras come with a flexible swiveling screen but they decided to tack on the mirror too which I am hesitant about...
Incorrect. The OVF of the A700 is viewed on ground glass which does not have infinite resolution although it is more than an EVF. Modern OVF's are designed for the brightest possible view but are lacking when judging when something is in focus. The view in the EVF can be magnified to closely judge when something is in focus.How is that so? As far as I know the A700 also use phase detection. Manual focusing is probably better with an OVF because of its infinite resolution, whereas EVF is limited by the number of pixels.