PJInTheUSA
Well-known member
- Messages
- 208
- Reaction score
- 6
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In this image maybe there is not much to do. But there have been many images posted that looked downright awful . Totally, and completely unacceptable. I'm $600 heavier now, sitting in the Hong Kong airport. I came, I saw, I refused to take part in Fuji's latest product introduction fiasco. My wife will now have a Canon camera, not a Fuji thanks to this white orb idiocy.This is a good example to place this issue in perspective, Fuji don't have to do much to get to what could be considered "normal".
You are missing the point.Well here is the same pic from my x10. I do see the effect - but really, are they THAT much worse?
This is not even close to normal ... these are orbsThis is a good example to place this issue in perspective, Fuji don't have to do much to get to what could be considered "normal".
So you missed the ORBs in the shot with the girl and the tree?PJ, thanks for posting the samples. Looks like I won’t have to haul my DSLR equipment around everywhere this Christmas and the x10 will do quite well.
Anything that cuts down the actual amount of light hitting the sensor can have an effect. There is a threshold of total light at which the sensor will create ORBs .... very much like a threshold of speed at which a rocket will send a satellite into ORBit ...Just curious, the X10 photo of the Christmas tree shot at f4.5 appear to be much better than those shot at f2.2 (with respect to orbs)- is the aperture setting a factor at all in this situation?