What metering mode do you use most of the time?

n/t
 
I would like to hear what metering mode is used most of the time by
others.
Before geting the D60, I had 5 years worth or more of Nikon Coolpixes. With those cameras, spot metering was 1.5 degrees. I kept the camera in that mode all the time, and by exposing either for a neutral midtone or some detail that I wanted to be "spot on," I had consistantly good exposures.

The partial metering on the D60 is a poor substitute for spot metering. However, I find that I usually use the evaluative mode and either manual aperture and shutter settings, or, in Av or Tv mode, with what I think the appropriate exposure compensation should be. I find the evaluative mode to be quite smart in many situations, and I know when to compensate.
--
Walter K
 
I use either evaluative or sometimes the incredibly useful multispot feature of my 1Ds.

-John
 
Evaluative metering in Canon cameras makes use of complex algorithms that try to compare the scene with thousands of known scenarios in order to come to an appropriate exposure. In many cases this will give you very good results however, the problem is that you never exactly know what kind of correction the camera makes. Using exp.comp. in evaluative metering is therefore not recommended. Center weighted on the other hand is a rather old-fashioned approach which simply averages the brightness of the scene with a little more emphasis on the center of the frame. If you get used to assessing the reflective properties of a scene, this mode will be most coinsistent results in my experience.
I would like to hear what metering mode is used most of the time by
others.
--
http://www.pbase.com/julivalley/galleries
http://www.photosig.com/viewuser.php?id=19579
Canon D-60, C-2100UZ, C-3040Z.
Juli

 
I find it quite useful. With experience (which is EASILY gained with a digital SLR because of the instantaneous feedback of the histogram), it doesn't take long to figure out how the camera "thinks" in various situations.

I like it, in that rarely is an exposure comepensation of more than + - needed in the evaluative mode.
Using exp.comp. in evaluative metering is therefore not
recommended
--
The Unofficial Photographer of The Wilkinsons
http://thewilkinsons.crosswinds.net
Photography -- just another word for compromise
 
If that's your experience then by all means use it. I am happier with center weighted. Secondly, I use a D60, you a 1D, perhaps the 1D is more advanced in metering as well (just as in de AF department).
Regards,
Ed
I like it, in that rarely is an exposure comepensation of more than
+ - needed in the evaluative mode.
Using exp.comp. in evaluative metering is therefore not
recommended
--
The Unofficial Photographer of The Wilkinsons
http://thewilkinsons.crosswinds.net
Photography -- just another word for compromise
 
Juli, I'm glad you asked this question, because I've been also been pondering it.

I wonder if any of you could enlighten a photographic newbie? What is the difference between the three metering modes (particularly as they work on the D60)? I mean, I've read the manual, and I know what it says about the metering modes, but I'm not clear on what those difference will entail in practical applications. Specifically, what kinds of situations would you use partial over center-weighted average, or evaluative over the other two, etc?

I ask becase, based on the descriptions of the modes in the manual, it sounds like evaluative mode is the best.. but surely there are situations where one of the other two modes would be better. Otherwise, why would they be there?

On my G2 (which was my sole camera until last week), I always just left it in evaluative. But it would be a waste for me to not explore ways to get the most out of my D60 now.

Jason
 
The camera could adjust the exposure variables, shutter speed and f-stop, to a finer degree than within 1/3 stop. In other words, if I could get f5.6 @ 1/116 sec than the evaluative mode could really fine tune the exposure. But to confine it to the 1/3 stop jumps is sort of counter-productive.
I would like to hear what metering mode is used most of the time by
others.
--
http://www.pbase.com/julivalley/galleries
http://www.photosig.com/viewuser.php?id=19579
Canon D-60, C-2100UZ, C-3040Z.
Juli

 
Iin Av or Tv (and I guess P) modes, the camera meters to the 1/8 stop, and will adjust the shutter speed and/or aperture to that accuracy, even though it can only display 1/3 or 1/2 stops.
The camera could adjust the exposure variables, shutter speed and
f-stop, to a finer degree than within 1/3 stop. In other words, if
I could get f5.6 @ 1/116 sec than the evaluative mode could really
fine tune the exposure. But to confine it to the 1/3 stop jumps is
sort of counter-productive.
--
The Unofficial Photographer of The Wilkinsons
http://thewilkinsons.crosswinds.net
Photography -- just another word for compromise
 
Specifically, what kinds of situations would you use partial over
center-weighted average, or evaluative over the other two, etc?
In most instances with digicams, you would hope that the contrast range in the scene will roughly fill the histogram without clipping (bunching up) at the high or low ends. This would provide detail in the highlights as well as the shadows. Once the contrast in the scene is greater than what the camera can handle, you either will lose highlight detail (blown out highlights) or plug up the shadows, or both. Evaluative metering usually does a nice job of balancing the exposure, and a look at the histogram will let you know if you need to move this data toward the left to avoid blown highlights, by dialing in some exposure compensation on the negative side. Or, the histogram may crowd the left end, with lots of space on the right end, in which case you could dial in some + exposure compensation.

Sometimes, parts of your main subject may be dark compared to the background, as in an airshow on a bright overcast day. If you want detail in the airplanes you could try spot exposure, although on the D60 that Partial Metering is too broad to be real spot metering. This will expose more directly on the subject. If your subject is a person seated in a relatively dim room with a bright window behind him/her, this could also call for partial metering. However, in both the airplane and person images, if you expose for them correctly, the backgrounds (sky or window) will be greatly overexposed, sometimes to the point where the highlights are completely blown out.

If you want to cut down on the influence of the light background, yet keep more detail in it, the centerweighted average is more likely than the partial metering to give you a compromise that may be acceptable.

Or part of your subject may be much brighter than a dark background, such as an array of Christmas lights on the side of a house at night. Evaluative metering will mostly see dark, and your lights might be washed out or greatly overexposed. Here, partial metering, taken from the lights, would give you the correct exposure for the lights. You would have to expose on the brightest lights, then use the " " button to lock the exposure, and then recompose.

Another use of this last technique: If you come to a complex scen in terms of the range of colors and contrasts, use the partial metering and focus on something close to neutral and midtone in brightness, press the " ", and recompose your shot.

None of these techniques will make the camera think for you, but if you try them all systematically, examine the histograms as well as the images on your monitor (not your cmaera's LCD!) you will soon be able to know which mode to use when, and how much compensation to add.

You probably knoew most of this, and I apologize ahead of time if it seems I am talking down to you.

--
Walter K
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top