Ringwraith69
Senior Member
Off course you're right: the car was a bit of a far fetched example, I was overstating it just a little
.
I agree that just having your gear calibrated by some local service dept will not be much of an incentive for Sigma HQ to step up their quality control efforts. But in my personal experience, the problem runs deeper than that. My SD14 suffered from very severe back focussing. I used it mainly for macro shots and it got so bad that at least 75% of my pictures were OOF. Not by half a mm. but by centimeters. If you're trying to capture bugs that are just about a quarter of an inch in size, that's quite annoying.
I tested the SD14 with all my lenses, same issue with each and every one of them, from 15mm. fisheye to 400mm. tele. Then I tried those very same lenses on my SD10: no problem at all. Now I'm no techwizz, but somehow that does seem to indicate the problem lies with the body, not the lenses. Delivered the camera with one lens (a 50mm. Macro) to Sigma Benelux with the explicit remark focussing was way off with each and every lens I owned, only to be told that focussing of both the body and lens was well within factory specified tolerances...
That really opened my eyes. It made me realise that Sigma has no real underlying QC-problem, but has chosen to produce equipment to tolerances that really are unsuitable in the photographic industry. At least, that's the oncly conclusion I can come to. And at that moment I just decided to give up on Sigma.
--
'We are only immortal for a limited time'
I agree that just having your gear calibrated by some local service dept will not be much of an incentive for Sigma HQ to step up their quality control efforts. But in my personal experience, the problem runs deeper than that. My SD14 suffered from very severe back focussing. I used it mainly for macro shots and it got so bad that at least 75% of my pictures were OOF. Not by half a mm. but by centimeters. If you're trying to capture bugs that are just about a quarter of an inch in size, that's quite annoying.
I tested the SD14 with all my lenses, same issue with each and every one of them, from 15mm. fisheye to 400mm. tele. Then I tried those very same lenses on my SD10: no problem at all. Now I'm no techwizz, but somehow that does seem to indicate the problem lies with the body, not the lenses. Delivered the camera with one lens (a 50mm. Macro) to Sigma Benelux with the explicit remark focussing was way off with each and every lens I owned, only to be told that focussing of both the body and lens was well within factory specified tolerances...
That really opened my eyes. It made me realise that Sigma has no real underlying QC-problem, but has chosen to produce equipment to tolerances that really are unsuitable in the photographic industry. At least, that's the oncly conclusion I can come to. And at that moment I just decided to give up on Sigma.
--
'We are only immortal for a limited time'