nothing short of stunning ...

I'm very interested in the GXR's usability. Did you compose most of your shots with the external viewfinder, or was it too much of a hassle?

How is the battery life? While it would be prudent to bring along extra batteries while traveling, how many shots per charge were you able to achieve per charge?

I look forward to your pictures (seen them ever since I started here over at the Pentax forum), but given your enthusiasm as well as many others, it looks like Ricoh is on the right track.
 
I'm very interested in the GXR's usability. Did you compose most of your shots with the external viewfinder, or was it too much of a hassle?
I found myself using both the LCD and the EVF quite a lot on this trip, and which I chose was somewhat linked to which lens I was using. I was carrying three lenses: Skopar 21mm f/4, Nokton 40mm f/1.4, M-Rokkor 90mm f/4. When I'm shooting with the 21mm, I often used just the LCD ... with the 90mm, I used the EVF most of the time ... and with the 40mm it was about half and half, depending on the circumstances.

I never find using the right viewfinder for a particular job a "hassle" ... ;-) ... I use whatever gets the job done best for my needs.
How is the battery life? While it would be prudent to bring along extra batteries while traveling, how many shots per charge were you able to achieve per charge?
I would never go traveling without at least one spare battery for any camera that requires one. Batteries are small, light, cheap, and without them you don't have a camera ... you have a brick. I also always buy a spare charger. I usually have three batteries and one charger with me when traveling. That way I can always have at least one in the camera, one fully charged in the bag as a spare, and one can be recharging. I number them and the policy is always to use and recharge them in rotation so you always know which is the next fully charged one.

How many exposures per charge is a function of how you're using the camera and many factors influence that ... I didn't do a formal recording of how many exposures I made with each battery, but through the entire trip I made about 800 exposures and charged each of my three batteries once. I didn't wait for the camera to stop functioning, I put the next battery in as soon as the notifier that the battery was low turned yellow (it's usually green); the battery in the camera wasn't there yet when I arrived home.

Given that, and given my prior use of the camera since late April, I'd say the GXR gets between 300 and 450 exposures per battery charge in normal use, from fully charged to no longer functional. The batteries are small, light and easy to carry ... I always have a fully charged spare in my bag.
I look forward to your pictures (seen them ever since I started here over at the Pentax forum), but given your enthusiasm as well as many others, it looks like Ricoh is on the right track.
If your interest is a compact, light, TTL camera with excellent image quality, that operates best manually, has a great deal of customizability, and has the ability to use both Leica M-bayonet lenses as well as many other lenses via adapters, at the moment I can't think of a better choice than the Ricoh GXR + A12 Camera Mount (or I'd buy it... :-)).

Adding one or two of the other camera units, you effectively have several different, high quality cameras all with the same control interface. The A12 28 and 50 mm camera units are both excellent performers, each with its dedicated, fixed prime lens; the S10 and P10 camera units have also proven to produce high quality results if you want a convenient zoom point and shoot for more casual picture taking. All five camera units are compact and reasonably priced for their performance.

As a system, it suits my present desires and needs perfectly. On the other hand, if your desire is for a more automated, SLR-sized sensor camera with faster shot to shot capture speed, a dedicated lens line, etc, I would look elsewhere.

I'll be working on and presenting more photos as I have time. The complete set of photos I processed and presented while traveling is now available for viewing as a set on Flickr:

On Travel - Isle of Man - 2011 ::
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gdgphoto/sets/72157627871704963/
--
Godfrey
http://godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com
 
First of all, thank you for your detailed write-up and response to my questions!
I found myself using both the LCD and the EVF quite a lot on this trip, and which I chose was somewhat linked to which lens I was using. I was carrying three lenses: Skopar 21mm f/4, Nokton 40mm f/1.4, M-Rokkor 90mm f/4. When I'm shooting with the 21mm, I often used just the LCD ... with the 90mm, I used the EVF most of the time ... and with the 40mm it was about half and half, depending on the circumstances.
Your setup and selection of lenses are fairly close to mine in focal length, albeit different due to the crop. I can probably manage composing with the LCD for wide angle lenses. Can you actually use the electronic viewfinder in a way akin to a waist-level finder, or does it really require you to put your eye to the loupe?
I would never go traveling without at least one spare battery for any camera that requires one...I number them and the policy is always to use and recharge them in rotation so you always know which is the next fully charged one.
Excellent practice. Hopefully the Ricoh batteries aren't as expensive as those for the M8/M9.
Given that, and given my prior use of the camera since late April, I'd say the GXR gets between 300 and 450 exposures per battery charge in normal use, from fully charged to no longer functional.
This is pretty good, not too different from what I get from current camera.
If your interest is a compact, light, TTL camera with excellent image quality, that operates best manually, has a great deal of customizability, and has the ability to use both Leica M-bayonet lenses as well as many other lenses via adapters, at the moment I can't think of a better choice than the Ricoh GXR + A12 Camera Mount (or I'd buy it... :-)).
This is exactly the kind of camera I wish to "upgrade" to. I really would like to have a backup to my M8, essentially a smaller camera that slips in the bag but still allows one to use existing M-mount lens with little sacrifice in image quality. From what I've seen thus far, the GXR has no problems dealing with wide-angle lenses and might even do better than the M8 for situations requiring higher ISO or longer lenses (focusing a 90mm isn't easy even with a magnifier). The introduction of the M-Mount module really got me interested, and with Ricoh's acquisition of Pentax, maybe there will be a high-quality, dedicated module for my 30 year old Pentax SLR lenses down the line.
I'll be working on and presenting more photos as I have time. The complete set of photos I processed and presented while traveling is now available for viewing as a set on Flickr:
A very nice set of pictures. Looking forward to more!
 
I especially like the Bicyclist and Norton images. All very nice. How would you describe your experience using the iPad for storage and PP? I'm very interested in this option for long trips in the future. I'm planning on getting the iPad III once released in 2012.
--
Cheers,
Snowbird_UT
 
I especially like the Bicyclist and Norton images. All very nice.
Thank you!
How would you describe your experience using the iPad for storage and PP? I'm very interested in this option for long trips in the future. I'm planning on getting the iPad III once released in 2012.
This was my first trip going super light without a laptop in many years, with only the iPad for communications and photography. I knew that I'd have access to a computer on the road so I also brought a compact hard drive along for image backup.

That meant that I didn't use the iPad itself for image backup. I used it to browse and scan the photos I was making, and downloaded ones I wanted to work on selectively. I used Snapseed and Photogene to process them, and they did a fantastic job. I sized and uploaded them to Flickr.com with Photogene.

I made 16 Gbytes worth of images and video clips so they could all have fit into my 64G iPad with room to spare (I generally keep about half the storage space free for this kind of stuff in a pinch). I didn't delete anything from the original capture card and had four 16 G cards with me to handle as much as four times the amount of shooting I did.

I also used Keynote on the iPad 2 to assemble the finished photos into a simple presentation so I could show them to people easily. That allows me to move them in a formatted way directly to my laptop system, or to convert them to a PDF. Very flexible.

What's a little tricky is how to integrate the work I did on the iPad back into my main photo workflow and image storage archives. I'm still working on that ... I've also got Photosmith which works in tandem with Lightroom but I didn't use it on this trip. That would likely have made things a bit easier to reintegrate once home.

The camera, three lenses, all the batteries, cables, accessories, cards ... and the iPad ... all fit in one compact A&A ACAM 7100 bag that was light and easy to manage through planes, trains, busses and automobiles. All the rest of my travel gear fit into one overhead compartment capable rollaway bag. (For more serious writing endeavors, I had an Apple wireless keyboard in the rollaway bag, and I did use it quite a lot.)

As a casual and lightweight 'on the road' solution to doing photography on the road, the iPad 2 and Ricoh GXR-M kit worked extremely well.
--
Godfrey
http://godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com
 
First of all, thank you for your detailed write-up and response to my questions!
You're welcome.
Your setup and selection of lenses are fairly close to mine in focal length, albeit different due to the crop. I can probably manage composing with the LCD for wide angle lenses. Can you actually use the electronic viewfinder in a way akin to a waist-level finder, or does it really require you to put your eye to the loupe?
The EVF's optics are not set up to be a waist level viewfinder. I use it at waist level much like I used to use a chimney finder on my Hasselblad: I bend down with the eye piece tilted up.
Excellent practice. Hopefully the Ricoh batteries aren't as expensive as those for the M8/M9.
The Ricoh GXR battery is about $45. I'm sure that's a bit less expensive than an M8/M9 battery...
If your interest is a compact, light, TTL camera with excellent image quality, that operates best manually, has a great deal of customizability, and has the ability to use both Leica M-bayonet lenses as well as many other lenses via adapters, at the moment I can't think of a better choice than the Ricoh GXR + A12 Camera Mount (or I'd buy it... :-)).
This is exactly the kind of camera I wish to "upgrade" to. I really would like to have a backup to my M8, essentially a smaller camera that slips in the bag but still allows one to use existing M-mount lens with little sacrifice in image quality. From what I've seen thus far, the GXR has no problems dealing with wide-angle lenses and might even do better than the M8 for situations requiring higher ISO or longer lenses (focusing a 90mm isn't easy even with a magnifier).
TTL cameras are always easier to achieve critical focus with when working with longer focal length lenses. The GXR-M is no exception. With wide lenses, the M's rangefinder is the easiest to focus device ever devised, the the GXR-M's focusing aids make it pretty easy too.
.. The introduction of the M-Mount module really got me interested, and with Ricoh's acquisition of Pentax, maybe there will be a high-quality, dedicated module for my 30 year old Pentax SLR lenses down the line.
You don't need one ... just get a Rayqual or other adapter and use them on the A12 Camera Mount. I have a 1969ish Pentax SMC Takumar 135mm f/3.5 that works beautifully on the GXR-M. I'm also using similar age Nikkor lenses with adapters the same way.
I'll be working on and presenting more photos as I have time. The complete set of photos I processed and presented while traveling is now available for viewing as a set on Flickr:
A very nice set of pictures. Looking forward to more!
Thank you!
--
Godfrey
http://godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com
 
The EVF's optics are not set up to be a waist level viewfinder. I use it at waist level much like I used to use a chimney finder on my Hasselblad: I bend down with the eye piece tilted up.
Excellent. I think one of the Sony NEX models feature a tilting LCD screen, which when used like an old TLR, could help with candid or streetshooting. Unfortunately, the SLR-like shutter sound negated this.
The Ricoh GXR battery is about $45. I'm sure that's a bit less expensive than an M8/M9 battery...
Half the price of the Leica batteries. Sounds good.
You don't need one ... just get a Rayqual or other adapter and use them on the A12 Camera Mount. I have a 1969ish Pentax SMC Takumar 135mm f/3.5 that works beautifully on the GXR-M. I'm also using similar age Nikkor lenses with adapters the same way.
I definitely have to look into this. I also assume there aren't yet any adapters that would natively support the Pentax DA lenses? The GXR would be perfect for the nifty pancake lenses.

Thanks again for an informative post!
Chyn
 
You don't need one ... just get a Rayqual or other adapter and use them on the A12 Camera Mount. I have a 1969ish Pentax SMC Takumar 135mm f/3.5 that works beautifully on the GXR-M. I'm also using similar age Nikkor lenses with adapters the same way.
I definitely have to look into this. I also assume there aren't yet any adapters that would natively support the Pentax DA lenses? The GXR would be perfect for the nifty pancake lenses.
Well, they still need a K-mount spacer 20mm thick to achieve the proper register which makes them much less compact than the M-bayonet lenses. I believe RJ (jinfinance on Ebay) is working on a K mount adapter with an aperture control for these lenses. However, I tried my DA70, FA43 and DA21 Limiteds with Micro-FourThirds and FourThirds SLR using one of this type of adapter and they weren't really to my liking. The focusing mount has very little friction and jumps whenever you touch it, making precise manual focus difficult, and the adapter mounted aperture control is fiddly at best. I ended up selling them and buying other lenses that worked better.
Thanks again for an informative post!
You're welcome.
--
Godfrey
http://godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com
 
I definitely have to look into this. I also assume there aren't yet any adapters that would natively support the Pentax DA lenses? The GXR would be perfect for the nifty pancake lenses.

Thanks again for an informative post!
Chyn
RJ Camera of Shanghai are in the process of making PK-LM adapters with aperture control built in - available about mid November I believe. They also have at least 10 other adapters for various mounts to LM (including a basic dumb PK-LM which I have and it is very well made and finished - works well with manual PK lenses on a LM mount).

--
Tom Caldwell
 
You don't need one ... just get a Rayqual or other adapter and use them on the A12 Camera Mount. I have a 1969ish Pentax SMC Takumar 135mm f/3.5 that works beautifully on the GXR-M. I'm also using similar age Nikkor lenses with adapters the same way.
I definitely have to look into this. I also assume there aren't yet any adapters that would natively support the Pentax DA lenses? The GXR would be perfect for the nifty pancake lenses.
Well, they still need a K-mount spacer 20mm thick to achieve the proper register which makes them much less compact than the M-bayonet lenses. I believe RJ (jinfinance on Ebay) is working on a K mount adapter with an aperture control for these lenses. However, I tried my DA70, FA43 and DA21 Limiteds with Micro-FourThirds and FourThirds SLR using one of this type of adapter and they weren't really to my liking. The focusing mount has very little friction and jumps whenever you touch it, making precise manual focus difficult, and the adapter mounted aperture control is fiddly at best. I ended up selling them and buying other lenses that worked better.
I tend to agree with Godfrey here, I still have my DA pancakes. This comment comes up quite frequently and as Godfrey points out the extra depth needed for the flange back distance of the PK adapter tends to take away much of the benefit of the pancake lens. Add the fact that the lenses were designed to be as short as possible and the focus rings and damping mechanism a bit short changed and they are not as nice to fit and use as the principle might seem. Add the other point that Godfrey has also mentioned before that the adapter with aperture levers built in by necessity have a very short stepless non-scaled throw with little friction and therefore setting aperture is more by user's judgement than any science of numbers. In this regard an aperture actuating mechanism that works by rotating the outside of the adapter seems marginally better than the Novoflex type which consist of a (well made) lever protruding outside the aperture housing.

By contrast the older manual Pentax lenses might be bigger and heavier but they were designed for manual use initially and work very well and intuitively via a PK-LM adapter on the GXR-M.
Thanks again for an informative post!
You're welcome.
--
Godfrey
http://godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com
--
Tom Caldwell
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top