Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In the first shot I like the hat and slight back light and how the light is hitting the beach chair in the background. As someone else stated, I do find the hair slightly distracting.These are 2 pictures I took with the 16mm kitlens.
OOC JPEGS, no PP. What do you guys think, are these ok or is the lens too wide?
http://djlhggipcyllo.cloudfront.net/1481218/98d77934114e004e99a75075c1dca63f6029450c/4.jpg
One nice thing about wide angle lenses for portraits is they work very well for environmental portraits. They work well for the shots where you want to include the background. Traditional portraits do their best to eliminate the background, which is not always good. The only thing about this shot that bugs me is my eyes are drawn to her right eye (the left eye in the frame) as it has more light hitting it and might be in better focus. I wouldn't worry about this though.
I think the problem with 16mm portrait is that with that short FL and close distance, the perspective will make whats closer to the lens look a lot closer than whats farther away from the lens... so the nose will gets more "pop" than the eyes and ears....
its a nice cool affect if you like it... but when you look at a person you rarely see that kind of "3D on the face" if you know what I mean... hence that make the person in the picture looks a little odd.
but nice pics thoI take portrait with my 16mm all the time... only I will step back and crop it later
![]()