I use both FilmGet and ViewScan. The one I choose really depends on
the final output of the scan. For example, if I am just making a
quick scan for e-mail or web, I usually go with Filmget. It is fast
and usually does a decent job without too much color correction
required.
If I am scanning for prints, I always use ViewScan set at 4000 dpi
/ 42 bit. The result is a 120 (+) MB file that is adequate to
produce prints up to 13" x 19" on my Epson 2200. ViewScan offers a
number of features that FilmGet does not (multi-pass scans,
multiple levels of IR cleaning, grain reduction, etc.). ViewScan
does require a little more tweaking with color correction but the
benifits are well worth it.
Both are well with slide films like Fuji Velvia and Provia 100F (I
have to give Viewscan the advantage), but ViewScan does a much
better job with grainier color negative films like Kodak Royal 200
and Fuji Superia 200 (in my opinion). My advice is to go to
http://www.hamrick.com and give it a try.
One other bit of advice, if you are currently using USB, an
investment in a SCSI card would be VERY wise (I use an Adaptec
2930). Your scan times will be reduced in half (or even better)!
I hope this helps.
Greg Brakefield
JWP wrote:
Are you using the Canon software or something like Vuescan?
If you have any thoughts on Vuescan I would appreciate them. John
Greg Brakefield wrote: