Olympus XZ-1 price gone up significantly

I just placed my order at B&H. $453.75 + $10. shipping.

My day started with gum surgery :( ... and ended with a new Olympus. I am happy! :)
--
"Gear is good. Vision is better."
 
I got mine from BuyDig.com for $394 w/free shipping last month. Now it's not even listed on the site. I'm glad I acted when I did.
 
Dropped back down to $445 for Amazon proper and we pulled the trigger. Now it's back up to $460!

Some places on Ebay had it for $425, but after the instockdigital scam we decided to pay a bit extra and get Amazon service! :D
 
No rush, with the smaller S95 selling at $365 it will surely drop below $400 pretty soon. And with an XZ-2 likely in the wings with perhaps smaller body size and a broader zoom range, the price will fall again.

Olympus MO: price very high initially then drop as the model cycle matures: E-PL1 introduced at $600, now $360 (and been there awhile). Hey, the XZ-1 was selling for $409 just a few weeks ago, based on this it has plenty of room to go down while still maintaining profits.
--
Sailin' Steve
 
Well did you get it? Have you used it? Tried SUPER macro yet? Happy camper? glad you didn't get taken by that low life online "retailer".
 
Got it. Turns out my wife did order it from an amazon partner and got it for $425 instead of $445 :)

Bit of a rocky start. The pictures came out very reddish, which turned our tan/white landscape rock brown and made our inside walls very red instead of grayish/creme. Turned the color to muted instead of vivid and that helped. But looking at the pictures it also set the sharpness to soft. Turned on Raw +JPEG to compare and liked the Raw results better. Process with just Picasa now or use Olympus Viewer if we need more control. Will just shoot Raw now.

Video turned out the same or better than our old Canon SD780 video as long as we set it to manual focus in low light to prevent hunting. Need a firmware fix for that! Even if it just turns off auto focus while videoing via a setting. The files are twice as big though, so ordered another 16GB SD card to be sure we have enough space on vacations. The video is obviously nowhere near as good as our Canon HF10, but it's much more portable so will see more use.

Haven't tried super-macro, but I have a 50mm macro lens for my e520, so not really a feature I was waiting for.

The main purpose for the XZ-1 was to provide a more SLR-like performance for our family photos when we don't want to carry around the DSLR. Looking at the quality I think we're happy with the results. No, it is still not the same, but it is a lot closer without being too big. My wife takes most of the holiday snaps, so it made more sense for the XZ-1 than a PEN camera, though I would have liked a PEN better :D

I think it's an awesome compact overall and am amazed at how small it is for what it does. We used to have a Oly C7070 and that took great pictures. It seems the XZ-1 is a modern equivalent in a much smaller and even better package.

Yeah, funny enough I probably could have purchased a battery separately and still been up on the deal with that dodgy retailer, but I didn't trust them for anything and frankly I'd rather pay more for an honest dealer.
 
I can get this through amazon for $327.

(I have a 25% off select digital cameras coupon)

To me it seems expensive for a G12 knockoff.

But looking at this thread I have to ask:

Is this a good price??

Thanks!
 
I can get this through amazon for $327.

(I have a 25% off select digital cameras coupon)

To me it seems expensive for a G12 knockoff.
Boy, now that's a provocative statement.
And not accurate.
The Nikon P7000 is a G12 knockoff.

The XZ-1 owes more to the LX-5, except that it ignored the good video part of that design.

It is a bit expensive for a P&S, but its MSRP is about the same as the G12,P7000, LX-5, and TL500 were at introduction.
But looking at this thread I have to ask:

Is this a good price??

Thanks!
It is an excellent price. The XZ-1 is still very popular and is selling for $50-75 more than the S95 or LX-5...i.e., well above $400.
 
I don't know about Funduro, but I just got my XZ-1 and am having a ball with it. Love the Super Macro. My first shots are posted here: http://smu.gs/qqdWOA
Well did you get it? Have you used it? Tried SUPER macro yet? Happy camper? glad you didn't get taken by that low life online "retailer".
--
"Gear is good. Vision is better."
 
To me it seems expensive for a G12 knockoff.
Boy, now that's a provocative statement.
Your right. That was uncalled for flamebait. I must hang out in the canon forum too much.

I just did a lot of XZ-1 research. I have mostly given up on the camera: Size, lens cap, video etc. But I keep on going back to the low ISO samples of the manequin on imaging resource. The hair is rendered magnificantly compared to the sony's I was considering that make the strands of hair a mushy mess.

Maybe a case with a d-ring/clip and the auto-lens cap can make up for the lack of pocketability?

I'll probably play it safe and use my 25% off coupon on canon (500HS = $192 w. the coupon) or sony (I can get an HX5v for $141 usd). The main reason for doing that would be to save my camera $$$ for when the canon S100 (or whatever) or new X10/X50 come out.

Decisions!
 
The XZ-1 is an acquired taste in regards to convenience and it certainly isn't shirt pocketable, but then nothing else in the enthusiast P&S category with the exception of the S95 is. However, its lens performance and RAW files are class-leading. But it may be a good idea to wait for the S95 replacement - if you want pocketable quality - or the X10/X50 - if you're willing to sacrifice a little body size for a modest increment in sensor size - or the upcoming Nikon mirrorless if you want a big improvement in IQ, don't mind interchangeable lenses, and want something that's no bigger than an LX-5 to get it. All but the S95 are to be announced in the next month if rumors are accurate.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top