Reading mode: Light Dark

E-PL3 camera pictures vs. E-p3 and GF3

Go to last post
P

photo perzon

Senior Member
Messages
4,653
Reaction score
733
Location
US
E-PL3 feels the same quality as E-P3

Screen in the back is really just as pleasant as the E-p3, smaller but with one push of the magnifying glass button, the same

E-PL3 is smaller than E-P3. A little larger and thicker than GF3, but it will fit in the same case.

From pictures the difference with between E-PL3 and the E-PM1 is .13 inches due to the screen and 1.7 ounces weight.

When I turn on the E-PL3 it clicks like taking a picture. The E-P3 does not click when turned on.

Though much smaller, the E-PL3 is only 2 ounces lighter than E-P3 and it feels denser, like more weight per cubic inch...in other words it feels solid. The GF3 feels less dense, more toyish.
 
Mostly I have a couple of micro 4/3 Oly and a Nikon D5100. As well as some P&S cameras. And the obligatory lenses.
 
I am please to report that the IQ of the E-PL3 is the same as the E-p3.

Excellent.
 
Wait a minute..how about this post of your from yesterday:

Forum Micro Four Thirds Talk
Subject Re: Totally different lenses [SIMILAR]
Posted by photo perzon
Date/Time 5:37:05 AM, Wednesday, August 24, 2011 (GMT)

Yes also D700 Nikon (too heavy), Olympus E330 (too ugly but had instant LCD preview), Canon S95 (has red-eye, the S90 does not), Sony NEX5 and NEX C3, Panasonic FZ38, Nikon 8100, Canon SD770, Fuji 31FD, and some 15 lenses.

But some people here have had a lot more money into photography, a lot more. Several Leicas, etc.
 










































and some samples from e-pl3 and e-p3 (noise filter off, sharpening -2 on e-p3, shapening default on e-pl3)

e-p3:









e-pl3:







 
Hans Gruber said:
Wait a minute..how about this post of your from yesterday:

Forum Micro Four Thirds Talk
Subject Re: Totally different lenses [SIMILAR]
Posted by photo perzon
Date/Time 5:37:05 AM, Wednesday, August 24, 2011 (GMT)

Yes also D700 Nikon (too heavy), Olympus E330 (too ugly but had instant LCD preview), Canon S95 (has red-eye, the S90 does not), Sony NEX5 and NEX C3, Panasonic FZ38, Nikon 8100, Canon SD770, Fuji 31FD, and some 15 lenses.

But some people here have had a lot more money into photography, a lot more. Several Leicas, etc.
Click to expand...
Fat chance you'll get a straight answer.
--
http://453c.smugmug.com/
 
Yeah but I sold some of those
 
Hans Gruber said:
Wait a minute..how about this post of your from yesterday:

Forum Micro Four Thirds Talk
Subject Re: Totally different lenses [SIMILAR]
Posted by photo perzon
Date/Time 5:37:05 AM, Wednesday, August 24, 2011 (GMT)

Yes also D700 Nikon (too heavy), Olympus E330 (too ugly but had instant LCD preview), Canon S95 (has red-eye, the S90 does not), Sony NEX5 and NEX C3, Panasonic FZ38, Nikon 8100, Canon SD770, Fuji 31FD, and some 15 lenses.

But some people here have had a lot more money into photography, a lot more. Several Leicas, etc.
Click to expand...
But what of the D5100?
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1034&message=39183205
--
http://453c.smugmug.com/
 
453C said:
Hans Gruber said:
Wait a minute..how about this post of your from yesterday:

Forum Micro Four Thirds Talk
Subject Re: Totally different lenses [SIMILAR]
Posted by photo perzon
Date/Time 5:37:05 AM, Wednesday, August 24, 2011 (GMT)

Yes also D700 Nikon (too heavy), Olympus E330 (too ugly but had instant LCD preview), Canon S95 (has red-eye, the S90 does not), Sony NEX5 and NEX C3, Panasonic FZ38, Nikon 8100, Canon SD770, Fuji 31FD, and some 15 lenses.

But some people here have had a lot more money into photography, a lot more. Several Leicas, etc.
Click to expand...
But what of the D5100?
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1034&message=39183205
Click to expand...
And the XZ-1?
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1041&message=39175792

I suspect photo perzon will quickly fade away at this point, so I invite everyone to join in and identify other cameras claimed to be included in the vast display now known as Photo Perzon's Menagerie of Fine Photographic Wares . I'll try to clean up the list in a following post.
--
http://453c.smugmug.com/
 
Cameras claimed to have been recently owned by Photo Perzon

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1041&message=39183157
D700 Nikon
Olympus E330
Canon S95
Sony NEX5
Sony NEX C3
Panasonic FZ3
Nikon 8100
Canon SD770
Fuji 31FD
and some 15 lenses

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1034&message=39178841
Nikon D7000
Nikon D5100

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1041&message=39175792
Olympus XZ-1
Olympus EP-3

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1041&message=39197029
Olympus E-PL3

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1041&message=39086310
Panasonic GF3

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1020&message=39178812
Fujifilm X100

Feel free to add to the list.
Please quote this post so we can keep it all together for PP.
--
http://453c.smugmug.com/
 
I think it is creepy to be obsessed with what "assets you have" when you are talking and asking a stranger. What cameras I have is my business.

Please get off my case about it already. I don't ask you what car or anything else you have, it is not proper.

My post was by the way positive and yielded positive information. It does not criticize.

So let's get with the positive program people.
 
this is wierd!

Why do you have all those different brand new cameras?

Let me guess: you are 32 years old and live in the basement of your mom's house?

TEdolph
 
photo perzon said:
I think it is creepy to be obsessed with what "assets you have" when you are talking and asking a stranger. What cameras I have is my business.

Please get off my case about it already. I don't ask you what car or anything else you have, it is not proper.

My post was by the way positive and yielded positive information. It does not criticize.

So let's get with the positive program people.
Click to expand...
Look, it is just sort of odd.

Like a person with an unusual facial growth; it might be rude but it is hard not to stare.

TEdolph
 
photo perzon said:
I think it is creepy to be obsessed with what "assets you have" when you are talking and asking a stranger. What cameras I have is my business.

Please get off my case about it already. I don't ask you what car or anything else you have, it is not proper.

My post was by the way positive and yielded positive information. It does not criticize.

So let's get with the positive program people.
Click to expand...
This isn't about your car, your taste in pets, your favorite ice cream, or anything other than your claim to own an unbelievably long list of modern cameras. There's nothing improper about asking you to verify that you actually do own what you claim to own, so don't pretend there's anything "creepy" or "obsessive" about being questioned about it. BTW, I'm not the first person to call you on your ever growing pile of notional gear. In short, this is all of your own making. Don't try to weasel out of this by playing the aggrieved party, and no, I won't get off your case about it.

Cutting to the chase, I don't believe you own the vast majority of the cameras you claim to own, which goes directly to the credibility of anything you post about any of them. With that in mind, any "positive information" you've posted is extremely suspect. Posting a photo of all of your gear together would go a long way towards dispelling the doubts, and so would answering simple questions about the source of the photos you post.

Surely you have a camera handy.
--
http://453c.smugmug.com/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Keyboard shortcuts

f
Forum
m
My threads
Mobile site
About
Editorial content
Cameras & Lenses
Community
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998–2025 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
©GPS Media - Guides, Products, Services.
Back
Top