D90 compared with D7000

Graeme NZ

Well-known member
Messages
181
Reaction score
76
Location
Pukekohe, NZ
I own a D90 and a D7000 and enjoy them both. I normally take them both and have an 18 to 105mm on one and a 55 to 300mm on the other. I also have a 35mm 1.8 which I enjoy using as well. I have noticed that the JPEGs coming directly from the D7000 raw files need very little pp where the raw files from the D90 always seem to need more contrast in pp to get good JPEGs. I am interested in any comments on this.
--
Graeme NZ
 
The D90 uses the EXPEED engine and the D7000 uses the EXPEED 2 engine. I would expect the D7000 JPEGs to be better.

.
 
My D7000 have huge raw files,wondered if it gives better noticable IQ in 11+14 prints???

Still like my D40 because files are easy and IQ is great.

Wher does D90 in IQ vs both cameras???
 
I own a D90 and a D7000 and enjoy them both. I normally take them both and have an 18 to 105mm on one and a 55 to 300mm on the other. I also have a 35mm 1.8 which I enjoy using as well. I have noticed that the JPEGs coming directly from the D7000 raw files need very little pp where the raw files from the D90 always seem to need more contrast in pp to get good JPEGs. I am interested in any comments on this.
If the difference is contrast, then it is possible that you have at least one or two settings slightly different.

Are you shooting the same picture control in each? Have you checked to make sure that you have not tweaked the contrast setting at some point on one of them? Are you getting identical exposures for comparison?

Perhaps you could shoot a test and post the originals.

--
http://kimletkeman.blogspot.com
 
Yes I will do
--
Graeme NZ
 
Could be the filter on the lens, if using different lenses. Cheaper filters can rob contrast.
--
Catallaxy
 
I also have a D90 & a D7000. Im selling off my D90 on Trademe soon. The D7000 is way ahead than the D90 in all aspects.... PhotoPhill .. in NZ :-)
 
D7000 IQ is everything what d90 is. D90 is 85-90% of everything what d7000 IQ is. This ratio could go for the bodies – performance - comparison as well. Although the LV, batteries, card slots, MLU, 14 bits and such effectively leave d90 in a class level that is somewhat one step below on this virtual stairway.

They are remarkably similar, or identical in the IQ essence. I shot them hundreds times side by side for specific reasons. And I do so on in the terrain. 85-90%. Otherwise.. the blue sky is different. It’s quite a difference. There is a long queue of users that don’t like so called “magenta skies” of Nikon, they had their own profiles, helping themselves with ACR etc. Of course there are many long queues going in various ways. I loved the d90 blues and losing it was one of my worries regarding d7000. But I like d7000 skies better should I chose. I still like d90 one too. I simply like both versions that belong to the character of each these cameras. But that’s a difference you will notice in execution. D7000 is cooler in the sky. And it’s cooler altogether for the reasons mentioned above. It faces a stiff opponent in the d90 has to be said. It’s a bit easier with present Canon cameras for now as far as the comparisons are concerned.

Where and when you are going to see 85-90% vs 100? I don’t know. One may not see P300 different. For some it’s very nice to have this 15-10% practical potential. You can see almost nothing of that sometimes, sometimes you really praise the difference in all its power. D90 remains a very fine camera. I didn’t change lenses but shot with the lens needed on d90 instead - on my recent ravels. I’d hesitate with uwa, though, or under some conditions. And if I go for one planned n very distant 1 and ½ month travel, there is no way I would not replace the very good d90 with another d7000 (at least). That sort of puts it in perspective the way it is for me. If one needs a better dx than d90... he needs the d7000.
He well doesn't have to need that, sure. I’d understand very well.

Make sure you have same setting when comparing two files. whether in NX2 modes or in jpgs. I don't shoot jpgs.

Best,

Hynek

--



http://www.sunwaysite.com
 
I've owned and shot both at the same time. I never saw a noticeable difference in IQ between the two of them.
 
I post process every worthy pic I get from my D90. And my D5000 and D5100 and D40. The idea that your D7000 jpegs don't need processing but your D90 doesn't, wow, gotta get me a D7000 and say goodbye to post processing forever!
 
That makes sense, just not to me.
The idea that your D7000 jpegs don't need processing but your D90 doesn't, wow, gotta get me a D7000 and say goodbye to post processing forever!
 
This kind of low noise pic never came from a D90, which I have owned. ISO 100 on the D7000 is a thing of beauty. It gives you D700 style satin-smooth IQ for less than half the price, at least at the lower ISOs. This is also a 50% crop which goes to show that yes, you can reallly use the extra pixels. To the OP, yes, if you're using Neutral or Standard with plus 3 sharpening, not much needs to be done. If you're using Lightroom, a slight nudge here and there is all that's needed in most cases.



 
Hi,

I agree, the processing and d90 vs d7000 topic has no relevance other than lesser tendency for noise to show up n more flexible files when needed – dynamic range, more resolution. And perhaps “non-magenta skies” in Nikon execution for those with some interest here.

Hynek

--



http://www.sunwaysite.com
 
The d90 isn't that bad at base ISO though is it? This one at ISO400



 
This kind of low noise pic never came from a D90, which I have owned. ISO 100 on the D7000 is a thing of beauty. It gives you D700 style satin-smooth IQ for less than half the price, at least at the lower ISOs.
I own the D7000 and the D700 and I had the D300 for years up until I got the 7000 a few months ago ...

They are all smooth at lower ISOs when shot and processed appropriately.
This is also a 50% crop which goes to show that yes, you can reallly use the extra pixels.
That leaves one with a 6mp image versus an 8mp image (obviously) .... and that is not enough to call out as one being really useful versus the other, which you are implying is somehow much less useful ... that would have had to apply in the old days to the D70s versus the Rebel ... and no one said such silly things back then (except maybe the Canon noobs.)

Here's an image that shows what the pixels on a D300 can do at low ISO ... I think this qualifies as smooth by any definition ...


To the OP, yes, if you're using Neutral or Standard with plus 3 sharpening, not much needs to be done. If you're using Lightroom, a slight nudge here and there is all that's needed in most cases.
With all three cameras ...

--
http://kimletkeman.blogspot.com
 
Sorry, Kim, you're still on ignore.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top