chadmarek
Leading Member
IMO, it's the over-use of "SR5", which, especially of late, has been contradictory almost on a daily basis.
It is obvious to me that some of the sources are complete bunk. A motor design is determined very early in the design process, as is the inclusion or exclusion of a CF card slot, and the filter size of a lens.
Yet, all of these things were at one point (recently) listed as "SR5" one way, then changed in another recent SR5 rumor.
Reminder (SR = Sonyrumor):
SR1=probably fake rumor
SR2=rumor from unknown sources
SR3=50% chance it is correct
SR4=rumor from known sources (60-80% the rumor is correct)
SR5=almost certainly correct!
It seems to me that a number of these things should have been listed as "SR3"'s at best given their propensity to rapidly change.
It's great that he Andrea is enthusiastic, but enthusiasm does not equal credibility nor accuracy.
IMO, the credibility has been squandered through a complete lack of rating accuracy.
chad
It is obvious to me that some of the sources are complete bunk. A motor design is determined very early in the design process, as is the inclusion or exclusion of a CF card slot, and the filter size of a lens.
Yet, all of these things were at one point (recently) listed as "SR5" one way, then changed in another recent SR5 rumor.
Reminder (SR = Sonyrumor):
SR1=probably fake rumor
SR2=rumor from unknown sources
SR3=50% chance it is correct
SR4=rumor from known sources (60-80% the rumor is correct)
SR5=almost certainly correct!
It seems to me that a number of these things should have been listed as "SR3"'s at best given their propensity to rapidly change.
It's great that he Andrea is enthusiastic, but enthusiasm does not equal credibility nor accuracy.
IMO, the credibility has been squandered through a complete lack of rating accuracy.
chad