Lens' for yellowstone

klh

Leading Member
Messages
798
Reaction score
12
Location
NJ, US
If you were going hiking in Yellowstone national park in late July, and planning to go on several hikes, would you take the 18-200vr and be done with it, traveling light (on a D90). After all, Ansel Adams photos in West Yellowstone probably were made with worse lenses than that. And a flash is a waste of weight.

Or would you take a set of sharper lenses - a 70-300VR for animals, and a 17-55dx for landscapes, or maybe some primes? Or just a lightweight compact camera.

I know the answer depends on how much the photos matter to you. But what would you do?
 
On your hike, I would take my 16-35/4 and a 105/2.8 macro and nothing else, unless you are also going to carry a tripod.

Roy
 
If you were going hiking in Yellowstone national park in late July, and planning to go on several hikes, would you take the 18-200vr and be done with it, traveling light (on a D90).
I'd opt for a 16-85, and if you have room for it, a SWA lens. Don't forget your lightweight tripod.
After all, Ansel Adams photos in West Yellowstone probably were made with worse lenses than that.
Don't bet on that. Oh, and he didn't travel light:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/ansel/sfeature/sf_packing.html
And a flash is a waste of weight.
I never take one, but there are cases where one might help.

I've hiked the Sierras (day hikes) with as many as two DSLRs and 3 lenses. That is probably more than I'll be carrying this year: Nikon D7000, Sigma 8-16 and 16-85 VR. I like carrying 2 DSLRs to avoid lens changes in windy/dusty places, but I think I'm going to relax a bit this year.





~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Seeking the heart and spirit in each image



Gallery and blog: http://imagesbyeduardo.com
Flickr stream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/22061657@N03
 
First, it is pretty much impossible to take a bad picture at Yellowstone unless you leave the lens cap on. As long as you have no illusions on National Geo style wildlife and bird picture (Long expensive glass) you will have a great time.

I would take one long and one wide. Many of the geyser really put on a great show and can easily go beyond a 28mm eq frame.

I would also bring a tripod and polariser. I for forget my CP much to my dismay.

If you are coming in from the west, there is a great bear park (drive through) filled with different varieties. Its about 60 miles or so from the west gate if I remember. Yea, its kind of a zoo but when you get the pictures back you can't tell.

Good luck and have fun. Do pay attention to the park rules. There are several books filled with story after story of death in Yellowstone.
--
http://www.nathanparkerphotography.com
 
Day hikes or overnight?

My preference would be a D300, 17-35 f/2.8, and 180 f/2.8. If weight was critical I'd take a 20 Ai-s and 105 Ai-s instead.

Garrett
 
Definitely take a long lens if you plan on taking pictures of animals. The buffalo will be easy to capture from anywhere, but a lot of the others you'll probably be shooting from quite a distance. Even the 70-300 will not be long enough at times, but it's a good start.

If I were going again, I'd carry an ultra-wide, 16-85, and either the 55-200 or 70-300 with me for walking about. I'd also keep extra lenses in the car: either a 300/4 + TC, or a Sigma 50-500. Plus a good tripod, and a prime or two for dusk.
 
I visited Yellowstone a couple years back. Used two DSLRs, one for landscapes and the other with a telephoto for wildlife. Shot most of the landscapes with the 24-85 but had a 10-24 if a wider view was needed. Wildlife shot mostly with a 80-400. On hikes it was the landscape camera with the two above mentioned lenses and a 70-300 instead of the heavier 80-400. Have fun, it's a great place for photos.
 
I was there in early October and used my 14-24mm on D700 a lot. I was not much concerned with wildlife but got a couple of bison shots and grand canyon of the Yellowstone with the 70-300mm. If I planned to hike, I'd probably take D700, 14-24mm, 50mm f1.8G. But that's just me.

Denis
--

I have made this letter a rather long one, only because I didn't have the leisure to make it shorter. Blaise Pascal, 1623-1662
 
I am just returning from a week long trip through the SD Badlands, Blackhills, Spearfish Canyon, Yellowstone and Grand Tetons. On my D80 I used a Tokina 12-24mm and then slipped my Canon S90 into my pocket for those few rare times I wanted more zoom (and I do mean few). If anything, I was more often wanting more on the wide end than the telephoto end.

I ttried a polarizer on the first day and was less then thrilled with the result. As far as I can tell on the D80 screen, I got the best color and contrast by simply using the lens hood on the Tokina lens.

I am anxious to get home and load up all of the images on the computer.

Schaf
 
I was interested in your question and in the replies, since I just returned from that region a couple of weeks ago.

Based on my recent experience, I think you might consider what you would plan to do with any photos that you take. If you expect to make gallery-sized prints of images of distant wildlife, you’ll need an appropriate, heavy, and costly kit (including, likely, a very sturdy tripod); if you want to view images on your monitor to help you to remember the experience and to make some modest prints, you can get away with carrying much less.

Let me give you an example. I have an extremely sharp, somewhat interesting, head-and-shoulders image of a moose that decided that he, rather than we, had the rights to a trail in Grand Tetons National Park, just south of Yellowstone. Since I’m not really interested in hanging a 16 x 24 inch photo of a grinning moose’s face my wall, the images that my daughter captured with her little Olympus XZ-1 are every bit as good for our purposes. OTOH, I have some images in which it’s just possible to tell that the object near the center of the frame is a white wolf; I suppose if I’d had a proper telephoto I might have a better photo of a distant wolf, but I still wouldn’t do much with it other than zoom in a bit to look at it on my monitor, since the wolf wasn’t doing anything particularly interesting and it wasn’t far from midday when I happened to see it. Nonetheless, since (unlike 97% of the people who visit Yellowstone) you’re willing to venture more than a few hundred yards from your car, you might see something interesting.

I happened to see something interesting, and I didn’t need exotic gear to capture an image. Since I’ve been freaked by grizzlies ever since one tried to take my food while I was backpacking in the park, I took a photo of a bear paw print that I happened upon one morning. Since it had rained the day before and then snowed that night, it was clear that a hiker had passed that way an hour or two earlier, a mother grizzly had made much fresher prints that overlay the hiker’s, and her cub had added its marks just behind mama’s. (That was about 1/3 mile from the Old Faithful Inn.) I’m not going to hang it on my wall, but my kid put a 4x6 inch image in her album, and the photo will help us to remember the experience. (BTW, a grizzly killed a hiker in Yellowstone today; he’d unexpectedly come too close to her cub.)

FWIW, I used a D300 and a 24-70/2.8, along with a 105 macro lens, and a 1.4x teleconverter I brought along to allow my child to enjoy taking photos of critters. I hope that the next time I go I will have a Nikon 70-200/4 (!) instead of the serviceable but limited short tele set-up. I also carried a tripod, which was useful for a variety of reasons, not least because taking multiple exposures allowed easy erasure of some of those 950,000 or so people who crowd the usual destinations in the park during each summer month.
 
A hiker died yesterday in Yellowstone by being mauled to death by a "surprised bear mother bear with cubs". This happened in the Lake Tapiti Trail near Canyon Village. Be careful and have a great time.

Clay
 
Forget about Ansel Adams. He lugged 10x as much gear as any of today's DSLR photographers into the wilds and he was photographing landscapes.

If all you want to shoot is landscapes a lens like the 28-300mm is a great choice for a FX camera. Often when thinking of landscape photography people exclude telephoto lenses and this is a mistake. The distances are great in Yellowstone and there are a of opportunities that require lenses in the 200-400mm focal length.

Normal wide angle is the other choice and I would go with wide and not ultra wide, like a 24-70mm with a FX camera and not a 16-35 or 14-24 at Yellowstone. In areas such as this the strongest photographs are ones that do a good job of excluding what is not needed to focus on what attracted you in the first place to take the shot.

For wild life and I do mean wild as a couple were mauled and killed by a grizzly bear a day ago in the park, a long lens is a good idea. Again the 200-400mm range is good and adequate for many of the critters found in the park. For smaller birds and rodents a longer lens would be valuable but then it would be too long for the bison and elk, etc.
 














Whoever wrote that it's hard to take a bad picture in Yellowstone was right. I brought the 18-200 VR and it was enough, except for once, when the Grizzly Bear and cub were across the valley. At that point, the 70-300 or more would have been great. This bear picture was at 200m, and cropped to zoom further. But overall, having one lens that operated quickly was enough to preserve memories.

Lots of people with big camera equipment.
A hiker died yesterday in Yellowstone by being mauled to death by a "surprised bear mother bear with cubs". This happened in the Lake Tapiti Trail near Canyon Village. Be careful and have a great time.

Clay
 
Lens schmense. Bring a tripod.

You should have many opportunities no matter what lens(es) you bring. Do yourself a favor and assure the highest technical quality by putting your camera on a tripod and paying very close attention to composition. And remember to turn VR OFF.
 
We took a raft trip on the Snake River while there a few years ago. Maybe take a bag to protect your camera. Moose, elk and bison are up close, won't need anything longer than 200 mm lens. Bears are harder to see, often only at a distance.
--
Pittsburgh pixelator
 
Don't know if you have already gone, but one thing you will want to do is keep a filter on your lens around geysers. Geyser spray can leave a permanent deposit if not removed immediatey.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top