SD1 Studio Tests

http://www.slrclub.com/bbs/vx2.php?id=sigma_forum&page=2&divpage=29&category=3&ss=on&select_arrange=headnum&desc=asc&no=154163

Interesting indeed. The contrast is intentionally set lower in order to bring out the details, according to the photographer. Keep that in mind when you look at the photos.

Die Musik.
wow those D3 photos are something rather special -you can literally see every possible detail in the skin, face hair etc
Not D3 but D2x to be exact. :)

Die Musik.
 
http://www.slrclub.com/bbs/vx2.php?id=sigma_forum&page=2&divpage=29&category=3&ss=on&select_arrange=headnum&desc=asc&no=154163

Interesting indeed. The contrast is intentionally set lower in order to bring out the details, according to the photographer. Keep that in mind when you look at the photos.

Die Musik.
wow those D3 photos are something rather special -you can literally see every possible detail in the skin, face hair etc
Not D3 but D2x to be exact. :)

Die Musik.
quite correct - sorry - typo
 
http://www.slrclub.com/bbs/vx2.php?id=sigma_forum&page=2&divpage=29&category=3&ss=on&select_arrange=headnum&desc=asc&no=154163

Interesting indeed. The contrast is intentionally set lower in order to bring out the details, according to the photographer. Keep that in mind when you look at the photos.

Die Musik.
wow those D3 photos are something rather special -you can literally see every possible detail in the skin, face hair etc
It is chaotic structures like hair or foliage where Bayer especially sucks...

wolfgang
 
http://www.slrclub.com/bbs/vx2.php?id=sigma_forum&page=2&divpage=29&category=3&ss=on&select_arrange=headnum&desc=asc&no=154163

Interesting indeed. The contrast is intentionally set lower in order to bring out the details, according to the photographer. Keep that in mind when you look at the photos.

Die Musik.
wow those D3 photos are something rather special -you can literally see every possible detail in the skin, face hair etc
Not D3 but D2x to be exact. :)

Die Musik.
quite correct - sorry - typo
I thought so. :)
 
http://www.slrclub.com/bbs/vx2.php?id=sigma_forum&page=2&divpage=29&category=3&ss=on&select_arrange=headnum&desc=asc&no=154163

Interesting indeed. The contrast is intentionally set lower in order to bring out the details, according to the photographer. Keep that in mind when you look at the photos.

Die Musik.
wow those D3 photos are something rather special -you can literally see every possible detail in the skin, face hair etc
It is chaotic structures like hair or foliage where Bayer especially sucks...

wolfgang
agreed

and its a different model etc - but I think the hair looks better on the D2X shots vs the SD1
 
http://www.slrclub.com/bbs/vx2.php?id=sigma_forum&page=2&divpage=29&category=3&ss=on&select_arrange=headnum&desc=asc&no=154163

Interesting indeed. The contrast is intentionally set lower in order to bring out the details, according to the photographer. Keep that in mind when you look at the photos.

Die Musik.
wow those D3 photos are something rather special -you can literally see every possible detail in the skin, face hair etc
It is chaotic structures like hair or foliage where Bayer especially sucks...

wolfgang
agreed

and its a different model etc - but I think the hair looks better on the D2X shots vs the SD1
Oh, Mark just to remind you, she is the same model. :)
 
http://www.slrclub.com/bbs/vx2.php?id=sigma_forum&page=2&divpage=29&category=3&ss=on&select_arrange=headnum&desc=asc&no=154163

Interesting indeed. The contrast is intentionally set lower in order to bring out the details, according to the photographer. Keep that in mind when you look at the photos.

Die Musik.
wow those D3 photos are something rather special -you can literally see every possible detail in the skin, face hair etc
It is chaotic structures like hair or foliage where Bayer especially sucks...

wolfgang
agreed

and its a different model etc - but I think the hair looks better on the D2X shots vs the SD1
Didn't I see that inconsistent mush spots within the black hair?
 
http://www.slrclub.com/bbs/vx2.php?id=sigma_forum&page=2&divpage=29&category=3&ss=on&select_arrange=headnum&desc=asc&no=154163

Interesting indeed. The contrast is intentionally set lower in order to bring out the details, according to the photographer. Keep that in mind when you look at the photos.

Die Musik.
wow those D3 photos are something rather special -you can literally see every possible detail in the skin, face hair etc
It is chaotic structures like hair or foliage where Bayer especially sucks...

wolfgang
How do you like these photos?

http://www.slrclub.com/bbs/vx2.php?id=sigma_forum&page=4&sid1=on&divpage=29&sid=on&keyword=829373&select_arrange=headnum&desc=asc&no=150163

They are all taken with either Leica DMR or Nikon D2x. I tried to emulate them with my DP2s, but I could not capture such fine details as you see in the photos. Of course, my photographic ability is to blame for most part, and DPs are not DSLRs like the Leica and Nikon. However, looking at these photos, I changed my opinions about Bayer sensor. It does capture fine details quite well. Not better or worse. It does its job quite well.

I am not taking side with any type of sensor technology here. So, don't come after me guys. ;)
 
http://www.slrclub.com/bbs/vx2.php?id=sigma_forum&page=2&divpage=29&category=3&ss=on&select_arrange=headnum&desc=asc&no=154163

Interesting indeed. The contrast is intentionally set lower in order to bring out the details, according to the photographer. Keep that in mind when you look at the photos.

Die Musik.
wow those D3 photos are something rather special -you can literally see every possible detail in the skin, face hair etc
A lot of the shots have blotchy areas in them, especially the last one. Also they all look over sharpened and overprocessed in general.
 
I think they look great! If nobody had said "eww skin flakes" I wouldn't have even had a reason to think anything was off kilter to ruin my day. Alright, have to agree on the powder bit, but that wasn't the point of the photo. I think people look fine naturally, so...what were we discussing, again, anyway? ;)
SD15 isn't shabby at all! :)
It isn't shabby, I agree.

...But it is yellow.
Looks like a natural skin tone. Yes, a bit of yellow in the forehead, but again looks pretty natural. (You'll notice there's less of it lower in the face.)
 
I liked the B&W Nikon D2X images the best by a good margin, though the first batch of portraits was good too (the ones starting with the guy whose hair exploded into CAs, which honestly didn't bother me).
 
I liked the B&W Nikon D2X images the best by a good margin, though the first batch of portraits was good too (the ones starting with the guy whose hair exploded into CAs, which honestly didn't bother me).
I agree!

Die Musik
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top