sundayman99
Active member
Daniel - Quite impressive! I especially like the middle one. You have me very optimistic about the capabilities of this lens! Thank you for sharing.
-
Welcome to the new forums! Please read this first. For known issues we are working to resolve, click here.
Canon 70-200 2.8 IS II vs. Sigma 50-500 OS
- Thread starter sundayman99
- Start date
E
Eugene Powers
Guest
I have done it already and even if I saw very slight increase in sharpness it was so slight that it does not justify decrease in shutter speed. The only time I even consider stopping down is to increase DOF like in this shot.
--
Eugene
The only time a smaller sensor with the same pixel count is superior to a larger sensor (aka higher pixel density) is when you are focal-length limited.
Quote by Lee Jay
--
Eugene
The only time a smaller sensor with the same pixel count is superior to a larger sensor (aka higher pixel density) is when you are focal-length limited.
Quote by Lee Jay
E
Eugene Powers
Guest
Check this out:
The license plate below is a small crop in the right hand corner and it is not even in the focus area and yet it acceptably sharp for a such a small crop.
--
Eugene
The only time a smaller sensor with the same pixel count is superior to a larger sensor (aka higher pixel density) is when you are focal-length limited.
Quote by Lee Jay
The license plate below is a small crop in the right hand corner and it is not even in the focus area and yet it acceptably sharp for a such a small crop.
--
Eugene
The only time a smaller sensor with the same pixel count is superior to a larger sensor (aka higher pixel density) is when you are focal-length limited.
Quote by Lee Jay
Sundayman,
I got this carrier to use with my 7D and Sigma when walking around...really makes a difference...
http://buy.cottoncarrier.com/cotton-carrier-camera-system-p/100ccs.htm
I got this carrier to use with my 7D and Sigma when walking around...really makes a difference...
http://buy.cottoncarrier.com/cotton-carrier-camera-system-p/100ccs.htm
sundayman99
Active member
Will this system work with a battery grip attached to the camera? That looks like a great solution for carrying the Sigma (as well as the 70-200/2.8). Although the BG adds extra weight, it stays on my camera 100% of the time now, not only for the extra battery, but because it makes it a little easier to grab and steady the camera in my hands - especially with heavier lenses (like the 50-500 OS!).
For speed/ease of use, I currently use a Black Rapid R-strap (I hate the traditional neck straps), but it's not ideal for bigger lenses like the 70-200 (or 50-500). So thank you for the tip! How easy is it to pull the camera out from under the chest strap with the big lens attached?
For speed/ease of use, I currently use a Black Rapid R-strap (I hate the traditional neck straps), but it's not ideal for bigger lenses like the 70-200 (or 50-500). So thank you for the tip! How easy is it to pull the camera out from under the chest strap with the big lens attached?
E
Eugene Powers
Guest
I just spent 9.5 hours on my feet only to sit down for a few minutes to eat carrying 7D with a grip and Sigma 120-300mm OS on one side and 5D2 with 24-70mm L on the other using Optech dual strap. Last year (at the same event)it was the same setup but with 50-500mm OS. And 120-300mm OS is a lot heavier than 50-500mm OS.
BTW, I go hiking with 50-500mm and 2 bodies and backpack.
At the end of the day I did not feel a thing. I have tried Cotton Carrier but felt like I was pregnant.
--
Eugene
The only time a smaller sensor with the same pixel count is superior to a larger sensor (aka higher pixel density) is when you are focal-length limited.
Quote by Lee Jay
BTW, I go hiking with 50-500mm and 2 bodies and backpack.
At the end of the day I did not feel a thing. I have tried Cotton Carrier but felt like I was pregnant.
--
Eugene
The only time a smaller sensor with the same pixel count is superior to a larger sensor (aka higher pixel density) is when you are focal-length limited.
Quote by Lee Jay
UrbanStudios
Active member
What kind of shoes do u have 
I just spent 9.5 hours on my feet only to sit down for a few minutes to eat carrying 7D with a grip and Sigma 120-300mm OS on one side and 5D2 with 24-70mm L on the other using Optech dual strap. Last year (at the same event)it was the same setup but with 50-500mm OS. And 120-300mm OS is a lot heavier than 50-500mm OS.
BTW, I go hiking with 50-500mm and 2 bodies and backpack.
At the end of the day I did not feel a thing. I have tried Cotton Carrier but felt like I was pregnant.
--
Eugene
The only time a smaller sensor with the same pixel count is superior to a larger sensor (aka higher pixel density) is when you are focal-length limited.
Quote by Lee Jay
sundayman99
Active member
Did you use the Optech while hiking? I used the R-strap a couple of times, but found the camera bounced/swayed a lot - even with smaller lenses. That's why I'm doubtful it will work well with an even bigger lens (like the Sigma). Still beats putting the camera away in a bag/pack, but I wonder if the Optech would work better (i.e. less sway and bounce). I appreciate the tip!
I just spent 9.5 hours on my feet only to sit down for a few minutes to eat carrying 7D with a grip and Sigma 120-300mm OS on one side and 5D2 with 24-70mm L on the other using Optech dual strap. Last year (at the same event)it was the same setup but with 50-500mm OS. And 120-300mm OS is a lot heavier than 50-500mm OS.
BTW, I go hiking with 50-500mm and 2 bodies and backpack.
At the end of the day I did not feel a thing. I have tried Cotton Carrier but felt like I was pregnant.
--
Eugene
The only time a smaller sensor with the same pixel count is superior to a larger sensor (aka higher pixel density) is when you are focal-length limited.
Quote by Lee Jay
The Cotton carrier comes with hubs. One of the hubs is shaped at an angle to allow for a battery grip.
Check out this video...really makes for hands free carry....a lot less fatigue for me.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcHf9xFQL1M
Check out this video...really makes for hands free carry....a lot less fatigue for me.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcHf9xFQL1M
springbock
Senior Member
I also have the cotton Carrier and love it for hiking. I use it with a 7D and Canon 400 5.6. It's well worth the money. The camera stays put and it's very quick and easy to remove. I love having both hands free and not having to worry about my rig swinging around. I personally find the Black Rapid to be a rip off.
--
'The truth is rarely pure and never simple' Oscar Wilde
--
'The truth is rarely pure and never simple' Oscar Wilde
E
Eugene Powers
Guest
The kind that kick a$$.
--
Eugene
The only time a smaller sensor with the same pixel count is superior to a larger sensor (aka higher pixel density) is when you are focal-length limited.
Quote by Lee Jay
--
Eugene
The only time a smaller sensor with the same pixel count is superior to a larger sensor (aka higher pixel density) is when you are focal-length limited.
Quote by Lee Jay
E
Eugene Powers
Guest
It sways but maybe a little less because it is attached just like a regular strap. I hold cameras while walking just so they don't sway. I also have BR clone so cameras not only sway but rotate too.
--
Eugene
The only time a smaller sensor with the same pixel count is superior to a larger sensor (aka higher pixel density) is when you are focal-length limited.
Quote by Lee Jay
--
Eugene
The only time a smaller sensor with the same pixel count is superior to a larger sensor (aka higher pixel density) is when you are focal-length limited.
Quote by Lee Jay
sundayman99
Active member
Thanks guys for the input. Carrying larger lenses (attached) will be a new challenge. If it turns out to be anything like my quest to find the perfect camera bag/pack solution (which I don't think exists), I will probably end up buying both the Cotton Carrier and the Optech - as well as everything else under the sun. But both look like viable options. Maybe CC for hiking and Optech for the city? (And yes, I've also noticed that BR is overpriced compared to other comparable systems.) Thanks.
E
Eugene Powers
Guest
You forgot one thing: After you do all of the above you should also change your name to Eugene Powers.
BTW, look in to backpack made by Vanguard. Air something. They are much lighter because they are filled with air. I think. I got one.
--
Eugene
The only time a smaller sensor with the same pixel count is superior to a larger sensor (aka higher pixel density) is when you are focal-length limited.
Quote by Lee Jay
sundayman99
Active member
I see you've been down that road, too... I suspect there are a lot of us Eugene Powers' out there. 
I will check out the Vanguard packs. I'm not familiar with their stuff (the ones I've been using lately are Think Tank).
Thanks again for all your input. I appreciate the real world tips and advice from you and all of the others. I have my own preferences on a lot of things, but if there's a different or better way of doing things, I'm all for trying them out...
I will check out the Vanguard packs. I'm not familiar with their stuff (the ones I've been using lately are Think Tank).Thanks again for all your input. I appreciate the real world tips and advice from you and all of the others. I have my own preferences on a lot of things, but if there's a different or better way of doing things, I'm all for trying them out...
You forgot one thing: After you do all of the above you should also change your name to Eugene Powers.
BTW, look in to backpack made by Vanguard. Air something. They are much lighter because they are filled with air. I think. I got one.
--
Eugene
The only time a smaller sensor with the same pixel count is superior to a larger sensor (aka higher pixel density) is when you are focal-length limited.
Quote by Lee Jay
UrbanStudios
Active member
and dont forget ur kick a$$ shoes haha
You forgot one thing: After you do all of the above you should also change your name to Eugene Powers.
BTW, look in to backpack made by Vanguard. Air something. They are much lighter because they are filled with air. I think. I got one.
--
Eugene
The only time a smaller sensor with the same pixel count is superior to a larger sensor (aka higher pixel density) is when you are focal-length limited.
Quote by Lee Jay
Rich Dykmans
Senior Member
I'd add a third to that suggestion. The new 70-200 V2 is just great with the Canon 2X!
Keyboard shortcuts
- f
- Forum