A renown commentator defined ART as only that pertaining to the
mind whereas CRAFT pertains to utility. For instance, a painting
is art because its only usefulness is to be seen and contemplated.
Photographs, however, can be useful for evidence or documentary -
CRAFT. Simply, photography can either be ART or CRAFT; depending
on INTENT.
Long story short, only one photo of yours (sixth pic) seemed more
"art" to me because it caused me to pause and contemplate. The
remaining photos were mere documentary of what you say and what it
is that you saw.
I hope this helps. Probably not. For whatever its worth, my
judgement of what is or is not ART is not based on my skills in
photography or painting, rather, in the substance of what I'm
judging. Perhaps my skills with the camera or the brush is better
than you or perhaps not. ART does not care.
Spent part of the day at the Norfolk & Southern Trainyard.
Let me know what you think.
Ayrow
http://www.ayrow.com/trainyard.htm
--
http://www.ayrow.com
--
Have a good day!