C5050 variation pictures

Kevin Atkins said:

Hi all:

I just created a Pbase gallery of pictures I took with my new
C5050. I set up some test objects and lighting, and then varied
one setting at a time.

Click to expand...

Kevin Atkins said:

Hi all:

I just created a Pbase gallery of pictures I took with my new
C5050. I set up some test objects and lighting, and then varied
one setting at a time.

ISO 64, F4.5, 1/15 exposure, tripod, used the remote to keep from
jiggling.

The light was a mixture of one compact fluorescent overhead, one
halogen torchiere, and one incandescent 60 watt spot. The camera
seemed to do pretty well with the white balance.

I varied the sharpness from +5 through -5, and then I varied the
saturation and contrast (just + -5 each). The photos are named
accordingly.

Click to expand...

Kevin Atkins said:

I will do some more testing with different settings later.

http://www.pbase.com/katkins/olyc5050tests1

Hope this is of help to others trying to evaluate the C5050!

Cheers,

Kevin

Click to expand...

Kevin Atkins said:

Hi all:

I just created a Pbase gallery of pictures I took with my new
C5050. I set up some test objects and lighting, and then varied
one setting at a time.

ISO 64, F4.5, 1/15 exposure, tripod, used the remote to keep from
jiggling.

The light was a mixture of one compact fluorescent overhead, one
halogen torchiere, and one incandescent 60 watt spot. The camera
seemed to do pretty well with the white balance.

I varied the sharpness from +5 through -5, and then I varied the
saturation and contrast (just + -5 each). The photos are named
accordingly.

I will do some more testing with different settings later.

http://www.pbase.com/katkins/olyc5050tests1

Hope this is of help to others trying to evaluate the C5050!

Cheers,

Kevin

Click to expand...

Kevin Atkins said:

Thanks Alfred, Russell:

I'll try to do more today, with more light -- as always, the
quality is poorer with less light hitting the sensor.

I'd be happy to do other variations and combinations -- any
suggestions? Noise reduction? Flash? Higher ISO?

Click to expand...

Doug Eldred said:

It would be interesting to see what the "auto-bracket" feature
does. I think you can choose 3 or 5 shots, with a couple of
different adjustment factors, but I'm not sure if those are linked
or separate settings. For some people, especially where time is a
factor, that might be more "useful" than manually adjusting things
and trying to get the same shot N times in a row.

Click to expand...

Kevin Atkins said:

Oh, and thanks for linking me up to your site(s)-- I meant to write
to you last night but it got really late and I crashed.

Click to expand...