The Photo Ninja
Senior Member
give me a break!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
--give me a break!
--I shoot mostly JPEG , RAW sometimes
nothing wrong with JPEG
I don't understand this statement. Are you saying that there is less work to do in LR than Aperture with NEFs to make them 'look better'? I haven't used LR but tried comparing a View NX2 jpeg from NEF to an Aperture jpeg from NEF and apart from contrast (View NX2 had more contrast) couldn't see a difference.I don't agree with your statement about LR. I use Aperture (on an Imac) and Lightroom (on a PC). Lightroom does a better job at converting RAWs with my D90.
In the final image yes, but you are using initial extra bits to either get more of the shadows or more of the highlights to show better. RAW is like a dough which you can use to make either a loaf of bread or a muffin.If you take a 14-bit NEF, edit it, and save it as a jpeg, do you lose the 14-bit range?
--The Xrite color checker - because color is sooooo off!
or...
people use NX again, because the colors out of lightroom are so off
or...
there are discussions about baseline exposure - cause the colors and exposure are so off
or...
the people that use Capture One, or Bibble, or...
wait... are you on Scott Kelby's payroll?
Yeah but do ya really need all that data
take a good exposure in RAW + JPEG
edit em both and you cant tell which was which
stuff up a little and you might be able to save something with a RAW
notice I said stuff only LITTLE
JPEG only does not allow for the maximum utilization of the file. RAW files simply contain more data than a JPEG allowing for greater flexibility in processing.
--I shoot mostly JPEG , RAW sometimes
nothing wrong with JPEG
OK, not so purely a hobby.
--I don't understand this statement. Are you saying that there is less work to do in LR than Aperture with NEFs to make them 'look better'? I haven't used LR but tried comparing a View NX2 jpeg from NEF to an Aperture jpeg from NEF and apart from contrast (View NX2 had more contrast) couldn't see a difference.I don't agree with your statement about LR. I use Aperture (on an Imac) and Lightroom (on a PC). Lightroom does a better job at converting RAWs with my D90.
I'm all for changing RAW processing programs, but somebody's quote of 'its better' isn't scientific enough for me.
Matt
--Yeah but do ya really need all that data
take a good exposure in RAW + JPEG
edit em both and you cant tell which was which
stuff up a little and you might be able to save something with a RAW
notice I said stuff only LITTLEJPEG only does not allow for the maximum utilization of the file. RAW files simply contain more data than a JPEG allowing for greater flexibility in processing.
--I shoot mostly JPEG , RAW sometimes
nothing wrong with JPEG
OK, not so purely a hobby.
Yeah but do ya really need all that data
take a good exposure in RAW + JPEG
edit em both and you cant tell which was which
stuff up a little and you might be able to save something with a RAW
notice I said stuff only LITTLE
I really like your Falls1-2.jpg on photobucket...was that a raw or JPEG only? Good color in that one.Fjrjacko wrote:
I shoot mostly JPEG , RAW sometimes
nothing wrong with JPEG
--
OK, not so purely a hobby.