I think the E-PL2 is a absolutely awesome camera

Hi Eric

Interesting I did own the E-P1 when it first came out. If you recall it was at a time that Olympus was not known for good ISO results, plus strong AA filters. The E-P1 images were just in a class of its own at the time of its launch. I am sure it still delivers top class images as things did not change that much....

What did change more is Olympus turning their back on the typical pixel race / tech type hype seen in the industry today. At first not so clear to spot but now much better I think.

That said the E-PL2 rightly mentioned by somebody is still just a 12MP PEN. What developed in leaps and bounds is the creative capability of the PEN line and the E-PL2 is giving us a hint into what is coming I think.

As I said a number of times, the ability one have with the E-PL2 to access unique and advance functions and to then start playing or experimenting by selecting different combinations has never been possible.

Just think one can decide to have a unique program mode A JPEG output that consist of a scaled iEnhance plus contrast, saturation, sharpness and graduation and one already moving to a unique result. Add to that numerous possibilities while shooting and it becomes even better. Then one can move to program mode P, S each with its own sets of outputs. No wonder Oly decided to offer the user no less then 5 user sets...

Just a comment on ART filters. I will put it harsh. I know the m4/3 purist think ART filters are only for sissies...Let them continue to study images on pixel level, we need them in terms of counting jaggies and to feed that back to the development team.

I regard myself as an artist and in that sense I found the ART filter to be a awesome tool. Ad to that the really awesome flexibility Oly has added to the (E-P2) ART filter and the sky is the limit. I think its only the start and to practice now will prepare you for the next gen ART filter. Have you tried the Diorama filter yet?

Long reply, hope it has value

Siegfried
Yes.. fine .. and many thanks for a thoughtful reply. It does seem that there is not such a major difference in the basic elements of the two versions..early and later .. and I do have a high regard for the lovely quality of construction of the PEN-1/2 versions over the EP's.. this I've seen mentioned in a few of the available Reviews .. I love the feel and handling of the "full" versions for want of a better description and taking all into account I really wonder if the cost of any change as it is here in old rip-off UK is really worth it at this stage. Maybe we SHALL see yet another leap of a kind in the quite near future.

--
eric-UK
Staffordshire
 
DXO confirms that the sensors in the Gf1, GF2, EP1, EP2, EPL1, and EPL2 are almost identical. Make ya wonder what's going on at Panasonic R&D.
What's going on is simple, they're producing high quality 16 MP sensors but freezing Olympus out on them. Olympus needs to recognize any alliance they had in creating mFT with Panasonic is a thing of the past and move onto Sony, joining Nikon and Pentax as buyers of their superior sensors.

Long overdue.

--
Sailin' Steve
 
I concur wt you main points, especially on iEnhance and Auto Gradation, which are really well implemented.
Don't make a mistake, the highlight / shadow control I refer to is not Auto Gradation, its a much more advanced adjustment.
Yes? How is it called? Where does it happen?

Am.
--
Photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/amalric
Olympus call it "Tone Control". You access it after hitting the + - "button" on the multicontroller, by then hitting the info button. It does appear that this is a new feature introduced to the Pen range with the E-PL2, though I guess similar features appear under different labels in certain other brands.
 
Yes.. fine .. and many thanks for a thoughtful reply. It does seem that there is not such a major difference in the basic elements of the two versions..early and later .. and I do have a high regard for the lovely quality of construction of the PEN-1/2 versions over the EP's.. this I've seen mentioned in a few of the available Reviews .. I love the feel and handling of the "full" versions for want of a better description and taking all into account I really wonder if the cost of any change as it is here in old rip-off UK is really worth it at this stage. Maybe we SHALL see yet another leap of a kind in the quite near future.

--
eric-UK
Staffordshire
Eric,

I wasn't sure if you were also wondering about the spec difference between the E-P1 and the E-P2 as well as between the E-P1 and E-PL2. I wrote something but it was a bit too long and subjective to inflict on everyone in the forum, so have sent you a PM (see the "view conversations" bit in your Profile) to offer to send it to you (or not) as you prefer.

Helen
 
Yes.. fine .. and many thanks for a thoughtful reply. It does seem that there is not such a major difference in the basic elements of the two versions..early and later .. and I do have a high regard for the lovely quality of construction of the PEN-1/2 versions over the EP's.. this I've seen mentioned in a few of the available Reviews .. I love the feel and handling of the "full" versions for want of a better description and taking all into account I really wonder if the cost of any change as it is here in old rip-off UK is really worth it at this stage. Maybe we SHALL see yet another leap of a kind in the quite near future.
Eric,

I wasn't sure if you were also wondering about the spec difference between the E-P1 and the E-P2 as well as between the E-P1 and E-PL2. I wrote something but it was a bit too long and subjective to inflict on everyone in the forum, so have sent you a PM (see the "view conversations" bit in your Profile) to offer to send it to you (or not) as you prefer.

Helen
Helen -
OK thanks.. please check the messages box ...

--
eric-UK
Staffordshire
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top