Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks, Jeff. I very rarely get bad photos - a mere 98% of my shots are non-keepers. Of course, I do shoot a lot so the 2% that survived the delete button are still quite a few.Hi Roni,
Do you have any bad photos? ;-) Fun thread. 40d_dane - that kingfisher photo is nothing short of amazing. I'm hard pressed to get a shot of one just sitting on a branch!
Fantastic set with the 300 2.8..... I especially like the colors on the young deer.
--
Romy
Thanks !What a great shot.
I can't imagine any human being being fast enough with a 500mm to get a fishing CKF just by being "quick on the draw" ;-) It takes in the order of 1 second from the CKF leaves its perch to it is airborne with its catch. I was hiding a place I had previously seen the CKF catch fish. It actually turned out that I missed the best spot by 10 m and unfortunately it was obscured by reeds from my position. However it did come within reach once while I was waiting for it. I did my best to anticipate where the CKF would hit the water. I didn't succeed totally - I had hoped for it to dive into the water in front of the reed you see in front of the bird on the image - but I was close enough and my reflexes were fast enough to correct and get the shot when the CKF dived in. This by far is the hardest-to-get CKF shot I've managed. The irony of it is that this was the first time I set out to get a specific shot of the CKF and had it on my CF card in first attempt and after just about 2 hours waiting.I'd love to know how you did it--did you hide in a place you know had kingfishers, or were you quick on the draw, or something else?
I totally agree - I was just joking ;-)As for the bird, I wouldn't say it was stealing the fish, I'd say it earned the fish!
ThanksGreat reflexes (you and the CKF),
Poor fishpoor reflex (the fish).![]()
Great capture. The pattern looks like an abstract of geese flying in tandem over an ocean. At a quick glance I though they were clouds then I realized they are probably prints in snow. Love it when I see pictures like this. Good eye!
Thanks! It was shot in jpeg (CF cards were still pricey at that time) and not much PP work was done. The bird was naturally colorful and the slow shutter speed resulted into saturated colors.That is a great shot with any camera or lens. Did you have much PP?.
Thanks, Jeff. For the ISS, I manually prefocused (on the moon or a star, can't remember now). With IS mode 2 on, I shot as if the ISS were just another BIF.Wow! At those focal lengths, the slightest movement will throw you totally off the subject. Do you use MLU + timer, MLU + release, live view, or wait... the space station is moving... how in the world do you get that?!!!
Thanks, Glen!Outstanding Liquidstone! Very nice.
Excellent job on Jupiter, especially with "just" 560 mm. I presume this is a composite shot of two different exposures to allow the moons to show and for Jupiter not to be blown?
Thanks. Yes. I shot several exposures and then picked out the best one for the planet and the best one for the moons and made the composite. I had the lens attached directly to a tracking mount that I usually have a telescope mounted on.Excellent job on Jupiter, especially with "just" 560 mm. I presume this is a composite shot of two different exposures to allow the moons to show and for Jupiter not to be blown?
--
Romy