Like I said, ever decreasing circles, I know all the theory.
You are wrong and if you know all the theory you know you are. You are wrong about the equivalence and you need to check up what exposure really is.
I could care less, I know what I meant in relation to the OP's question.
Frankly whether you care or care less is not anyone's concern.
I don't know if you and Sergey have a history. It may be your private sandbox but I think you should get the facts straight anyway. To me it seems relevant to compare to FF as that's where the OP started. (Well, to me it is always relevant, to others it may not be so.)
He's a Sociopath who's currently stalking my posts after embarrassing himself in relation to what a fast lens is for.
Now you got me here, what was that again about the fast lenses? I am not even sure I ever discussed it with you, but even if I did it has been quickly forgotten. For me fast lenses are for certain look in the images, and that is how they work for me. For someone else it can be anything they wish. Stalking? You mean like this (deleted by the administrators)?
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1022&message=37620943
papillon_65 wrote:
... So yes I jumped all over you on this thread, it's called payback and you obviously can't cope with it.
About embarrassment, was it like this?
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1018&message=32588873
papillon_65 wrote:
Actually, if we are talking macro, landscape and nature then neither Canon or Nikon would be your best choice.
Of course after this reply the poor dummy could not even answer straight
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1018&message=32603642
Or was it here,
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1022&message=37832298
papillon_65 wrote:
This is the main difference between Olympus and the other brands. I like the fact that I can shoot all my 4/3's lenses wide open and get decent results. When you are used to shooting Zuiko lenses, performance across the frame becomes noticeable when using lenses which generally need stopping down.
It does not look so to me, with examples (could this be any more wide open?) - why would anyone even think about stopping it down?
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1022&message=37834556
In fact I tried this on almost every lens I have. And I guess what, the very next day the broken record sang again,
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1041&message=37841642
This is often true, everyone of my Zuiko's is sharp wide open, including the kit lenses. This is one of the reasons I shoot 4/3's and m4/3's. With APS-C you need the better high ISO performance to compensate for a lot of the lenses, so you don't really win much anyway anyway (unless you have very expensive lenses).
More examples,
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1041&message=37842009
And now we come to f2 = f2 = equivalent - how so? Has this not been beaten to death on the other forums?
He's had to re-invent himself in the past and is the longest serving Olympus troll who bores us all rigid about Nikon.
Us?
Unfortunately he has now decided to make this his new playground. He needs to get a life.
I think I have far more life than you do, but that is not what I would discuss on the forums with you. Get life yourself.
--
- sergey
