Fast Mid-Range Zoom for DX?

Digetydog

Senior Member
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
211
Location
Parts Unknown, TX, US
My father (who shoots a D90) has a 16-85 and I have a 18-200 VRII (D7000). While both of us are very happy with our lenses for general use, they aren't always fast enough for available light. While my 35mm and 50mm work most of the time, they aren't ideal for shooting children's events when foot zooming is not practical (or may be prohibited).

Dropping $1,4000 for Nikons f/2.8 DX zoom (which gets mediocre reviews) seems like a bad spend.

Thoughts on best alternatives?
 
Most people seem to agree that the Tamron 17-50 are good bets. I have had success with the Sigma 18-50 on 4/3 mount, although I have not tried it on Nikon. If you don't need wider angles, you can get a 24-70 (Sigma) or 28-75 (Tamron) or similar. Any of these will give you constant f/2.8 at a fraction of the cost of a 17-55 or 24-70 Nikkor.

Cheers
--
--Wyatt
http://photos.digitalcave.ca
All images (c) unless otherwise specified, please ask me before editing.
 
My favorite for this certainly is the Tamron SP 17-50mm F/2.8.
--
Michael
 
Ditto.
Nothing is like Nikon.

Just get a used one for $900, and be sure to test it to make sure the AF is accurate on your camera bodies.
 
If not the 17-55 f/2.8 DX, look at the 28-70 f/2.8 or 35-70 f/2.8 depending upon budget and desired focal length.
 
Flash?
--
Best Regards,
Renato

'The world is going to pieces and people like Adams and Weston are photographing rocks.' Henri Cartier Bresson, in the 1930's
 
Flash?
--
Best Regards,
Renato

'The world is going to pieces and people like Adams and Weston are photographing rocks.' Henri Cartier Bresson, in the 1930's
With a flash, my 18-200mm is perfect for most of my uses. Unfortunately, there are times when a flash isn't allowed or approriate. I am leaning towards the Tamron.
 
Sigma 50-150mm f2.8 has excellent IQ and fast and accurate autofocus. Price is around $700 and it is a very good value considering the capabilities and quality of the lens. It is also half the size and half the weight of the Nikon f2.8 telephoto zoom lenses.
 
"Dropping $1,4000 for Nikons f/2.8 DX zoom (which gets mediocre reviews) seems like a bad spend."
Which f/2.8 lens you are talking about?

Raj
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top