Where are the AF-S 35mm f/1.8?

Buy and ship the Tokina 35mm 2.8 to me and I'll send you my 35mm 1.8 DX ;)
What is the attraction of the Tokina, just the macro or something else?
.

That Tokina 35 f/2.8 is optically brilliant, almost faultless - but it's slower, bigger, and over twice as expensive than the 35 1.8G. It's a weird hybrid of things, slow for a prime, very short for a 1:1 macro... But man, it's a nice lens on aps-c when you can find a use for it.

.
I think it's $270 vs the $199(if you can find it for that) for the 1.8.
.

Wow - fairly good bargain, then, IMO.

.
 
I didn't bite on the 35G back when it was $160 - can't remember if that was Bing cashback or some other deal.

Now I regret it, can't bring myself to pay $200. :(
.

I paid $199 when it first came out. I think you should ask yourself, "Is there something else photography-related for $200 that will be as fun/useful to me as the 35 1.8G"? :)

.
 
I paid $199 when it first came out. I think you should ask yourself, "Is there something else photography-related for $200 that will be as fun/useful to me as the 35 1.8G"? :)
I'm still waffling on 30mm Sigma vs 35mm Nikon. I kind of like the wider angle, since I have a 50mm Sigma already.
 
You've made the vignetting look natural and taken advantage of the lens's central sharpness. Very good portraits.

I see you didn't do any landscapes...

--
Leonard Migliore
 
I didn't bite on the 35G back when it was $160 - can't remember if that was Bing cashback or some other deal.

Now I regret it, can't bring myself to pay $200. :(
Even though it's worth more? It's a small, sharp f/1.8 and a major bargain unless all that plastic turns to dust.

--
Leonard Migliore
 
You've made the vignetting look natural and taken advantage of the lens's central sharpness. Very good portraits.

I see you didn't do any landscapes...
Landscapes or anything at infinity focus are not something you can really do with this lens on FX, at any aperture. The corners go from a soft vignette to a hard black curve, not fixable or attractive.

But for close-in shots, like the ones I showed - it's surprisingly good. Oddly enough, this is the application I used it for on DX anyway 90% of the time, so I don't really notice an FX limitation that much. Just gotta be aware that there are those limitations if you plan to shoot this on FF.

.
 
You've made the vignetting look natural and taken advantage of the lens's central sharpness. Very good portraits.

I see you didn't do any landscapes...
Landscapes or anything at infinity focus are not something you can really do with this lens on FX, at any aperture. The corners go from a soft vignette to a hard black curve, not fixable or attractive.

But for close-in shots, like the ones I showed - it's surprisingly good. Oddly enough, this is the application I used it for on DX anyway 90% of the time, so I don't really notice an FX limitation that much. Just gotta be aware that there are those limitations if you plan to shoot this on FF.
My landscape crack was an effort to acknowledge that you know what you're doing, and are using the lens where it will work (and not using it where it doesn't).

--
Leonard Migliore
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top