You know what other countries say about US, we're spoiled brats! That's a fact Jack.
We complain too much in the wrong places. You know the saying...when in Rome, do what the Romans do. Though, the positive thing about it, if we're in the US, we push the limits and become avant garde.
We complain too much in the wrong places. You know the saying...when in Rome, do what the Romans do. Though, the positive thing about it, if we're in the US, we push the limits and become avant garde.
Ok, so you don't know much about the challenges of Engineering and Science; and don't know much about Economics...I think you're screwed. Dude, you're asking for so much for nothing. I think you just lost your logical sense.A short hour drive out of my 1st world town I often can experience 3rd world conditions and thinking
I am no optics/sensor expert, but I know Moore all too well
I am hopefully that them sensor designers can squeeze more out of less. We've done that for 30 years on transistors.
The main point is that do you get something meaningful. Of course more pixels is better than fewer. More dynamic range better than less. More CPU processing beter than less.
In my humble usage model my priorities remaing the same. Giving me 32Meg at D3s+ sensitivity is nice, charge me 5K for it I won't bite, charge me 2K and I will.
For how I shoot more pixels is of minimum value, to others I appreciate pixels are important.
What I would bite for would be D4 with 16-18 and much better AFS ( translucent mirror? ) Great video and focus ( 30FPS/60FPS ), faster stills. For that I would run out and add a D4 to my D3s.
24Megpixel with matching to D3s and small incremental in video/FPS and focus won't make me buy. I'll wait for D5!
Cheers
Chile, Argentina, Brazil... 3rd world?Thom has a new article up and more relevant than his last about his field trip to 3rd world country.
--
"The tragedy of old age is not that one is old, but that one is young."
O.Wilde