LOL x10.Shut up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LOL x10.Shut up.
I think there is a very good chance that before the summer is over, there will be replacements for the D700 and D300. You know that I we know that.So all of this falls on deaf ears, why bother posting to this thread if you hate video.Good to read that. I'm very glad for those tv show and film producers. People here are photographers and can't care any less.
--
Thierry
Agreed, for stills and high iso if you need only 12 MP.I own a 5D2. It is a pretty good camera. But the AF is'nt great, I have had to reject one for dust and dirt problems, the low ISO banding is sometimes apparent and the D700 spanks it for high ISO work. D700 is also nicer to use IMO with a better sealed, more durable body and much better AF.So all of this falls on deaf ears, why bother posting to this thread if you hate video.Good to read that. I'm very glad for those tv show and film producers. People here are photographers and can't care any less.
--
Thierry
I know.The 5D2 also happens to be produce good HD video. But even then, it is popular with video fans because of its video picture quality IN SPITE OF its obvious limitations. Most serious video users of the 5D2 choose to add a lot of gear to the body to make it practical and useable. You should see the rig serious videomakers end up adding to it !!
Wait till someone does raw.Using DSLRs for video was a development that most of the camera makers did not plan for. Even Canon. But Canon did a great job in moving to exploit this new and fast moving market. Nikon stuck to what they new, were more conservative and so let Canon establish themselves in the video DSLR space.
I'm hoping it's Nikon.But things change. I dare say that in a couple of years time the 5D2 will be seen as way out of date. I suspect that something else ( perhaps from Canon, perhaps from Nikon, maybe Panasonic ) will have become the new video favourite. I suspect there will be a video-focused DSLR which is a lot easier to use than the 5D2 - the first to come to market to overcome the inherent problems of the DSLR body will probably do very well.
I imagine you use primes for 5D2 landscapes, maybe Nikon lenses? But do you see any CA or color fringing with the 5D2 and canon lenses? I do and I would guess it's the 21 MP size.For general stills photography, I think the D700 is probably the better all-round tool although my 5D2 does great landscapes ! The files look very nice and it is easy to produce good looking images from the 5D2.
I have strong opinions and radical views that often prove out, like my prediction that Nikon would release no FF in 2010.However, The lack of balance from the OP frankly makes him sound like some crazy fanboy.
I think the assumption here is, if you don't follow the good old boy line, then your opinions are an attack on the good old boy status quo. ie: the D700/D3s is the best camera in the world (because dslr video doesn't matter).Like I said, I have a 5D2 and it is a good camera. But the OP is exaggerating things in a strange way, for reasons only he can understand.
No, but cars drive me nuts, way way overpriced, way too much plastic and not an honest dealer among them. Of course I'm talking about cars under 50k.Its a bit strange how people get so opinionated about electronic objects that will always become obsolete. I wonder if he also gets so excited about his washing machine?? After all, that is just a tool to get a job done as well.
I don't know that I know that, it's not what I'm predicting. A D700 replacement getting 1080 video and what, 12 MP again, that's weird and not likely. How can a so called D800 come out with superior video to the D3s and likely superior MP and be half the price? Impossible. Likewise, how can a D800 come out with 1080 video and only 12 MP? Impossible, and dumb. You are being influenced by the D7000 because it has 1080, it's not a portent for anything, it's not FF. Nikon is in a pickle.I think there is a very good chance that before the summer is over, there will be replacements for the D700 and D300. You know that I we know that.
It has to have high MP too, and be moderately priced, that camera is not coming this year, no way. A D700s is more likely, and D3X with 1080 video is more likely but that will cost 8 or 9k and will not be this summer.I think it is fair to say that these cameras will certainly have HD 1080 and in the case of the D700 replacement, be FF. Your wishes will be granted !
I hope you are right, but you're not.As the D700 is a couple of years old and is to be replaced so soon, your rantings in this thread will then seem a bit silly, won't they?
This is just nonsense !. A D700 replacement getting 1080 video and what, 12 MP again, that's weird and not likely. How can a so called D800 come out with superior video to the D3s and likely superior MP and be half the price? Impossible. Likewise, how can a D800 come out with 1080 video and only 12 MP? Impossible, and dumb. You are being influenced by the D7000 because it has 1080, it's not a portent for anything, it's not FF. Nikon is in a pickle.
So please explain how Nikon goes from first D3 (very expensive) to D700 (exact same FF IQ but much cheaper) to D3s (adds 720 video slight tweak up in iso and very expensive) to D800 FF (far superior AF 1080 video, superior high MP, equal iso IQ to D3s and half the price). You can't, not gonna happen.This is just nonsense !. A D700 replacement getting 1080 video and what, 12 MP again, that's weird and not likely. How can a so called D800 come out with superior video to the D3s and likely superior MP and be half the price? Impossible. Likewise, how can a D800 come out with 1080 video and only 12 MP? Impossible, and dumb. You are being influenced by the D7000 because it has 1080, it's not a portent for anything, it's not FF. Nikon is in a pickle.
The D7000 replaced the D90, and in doing so offered more MP and HD 1080 than the D300s that supposedly was above it !!
Why should'nt there be a similar upgrade for FF?
According to your logic, the D7000 would not exist. You are making no sense at all. Calm down, stop embarrassing yourself..![]()
Okay, I'll buy that.I think you answered your own question.
Nikon launched the D700 offering D3 IQ at half the price.
They launched the D7000, replacing the D90 but also offering better IQ and HD over the D300- a model range above.
They will do the same with D800.
D4 will create space above D800.
It's not hard to imagine.
So just stop it. Stop it now. Calm down. Take a Valium or something.![]()
The D7000 gives evidence that the current sensor technology will support it.So please explain how Nikon goes from first D3 (very expensive) to D700 (exact same FF IQ but much cheaper) to D3s (adds 720 video slight tweak up in iso and very expensive) to D800 FF (far superior AF 1080 video, superior high MP, equal iso IQ to D3s and half the price). You can't, not gonna happen.
... You've been trying to make this point on more than few threads now, and it does sound like video is so important to you that you minimize other features, features much more aligned with what a still camera primarily does. The only way you can compare, let alone argue that a 5D superior to a D700, or even belongs on the same page as any version of the D3, is to place video as a more essential feature than AF, overall performance, and even build.The wrong forum if you want to be liked and have positive responses to dslr video needs but not in regards to the D3s which has very god 720 video. To say this is a still photographer's gear site and that means no video discussion when video is a major component of the D3s and will be for the next FF Nikon is rude, inconsiderate, narrow minded and just plain wrong. No offense, but I know when I'm right, and I never said or even implied that video was my only criteria, you made that up to bolster your view. I am all about FF high MP AND 1080 video, which Nikon is sorely lacking.Left ebhind by what? The best 135 framed sports camera ever made? The highest resolution 135 based camera for professionals?
If you want video, be aware that this is a still photographer's gear site. You will not find a whole lot of support here. That is why ScottMac is getting flak. It doesn't help that he ignores the facts about the build and useablilty of the D700, much less the D3S. If like ScottMac, video is your ONLY criteria, you are on the wrong forum.
--The wrong forum if you want to be liked and have positive responses to dslr video needs but not in regards to the D3s which has very god 720 video. To say this is a still photographer's gear site and that means no video discussion when video is a major component of the D3s and will be for the next FF Nikon is rude, inconsiderate, narrow minded and just plain wrong. No offense, but I know when I'm right, and I never said or even implied that video was my only criteria, you made that up to bolster your view. I am all about FF high MP AND 1080 video, which Nikon is sorely lacking.Left ebhind by what? The best 135 framed sports camera ever made? The highest resolution 135 based camera for professionals?
If you want video, be aware that this is a still photographer's gear site. You will not find a whole lot of support here. That is why ScottMac is getting flak. It doesn't help that he ignores the facts about the build and useablilty of the D700, much less the D3S. If like ScottMac, video is your ONLY criteria, you are on the wrong forum.
--I agree.I think people shouldn't be so literal.
IN FACT, the D3s WAS (indeed) Nikon's response to the 5DMII.
That isn't to say that Nikon designed it to compete with the 5DMII.
But, rather, it was the de facto response in time and place.
Nikon and Canon were not having a conversation.
Nikon's "response" was a private statement, because Nikon has its own dialog.
A shout across the world for higher ISO.
--
Sincerely,
GlobalGuyUSA
seriously. . .So just stop it. Stop it now. Calm down. Take a Valium or something.![]()
No I didnt but good catchbut have you checked out the one and only thread he has posted on the Canon forums?
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1032&message=36107847
That's good advice.It also contains what could be the one and only photo. I really think this is what the 'ignore' button is all about unless one really likes this type of thread![]()
I don't agree, especially right now. The majority want and indeed expect, high MP, high iso, 1080 video, FF and moderate price. It is also true that Nikon is very late to that game and may never catch up, especially in regards to price. You are all dreaming if you think a Nikon FF with high MP 1080 HD and high iso is coming at a D700 or even a D3s price, this is a pipe dream, a Nikon like that will be in the stratosphere regarding price. Get real. Mark my word. An 18, 21 or 24 MP FF Nikon with 1080 video cannot be priced less than the D3s, impossible.But the world of still photography, as it sits today, things like AF, performance, and build, are more important to the vast majority of people using DSLR's than video.
Try staying on topic and stop stalking, how's that for advice.No I didnt but good catchbut have you checked out the one and only thread he has posted on the Canon forums?
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1032&message=36107847
That's good advice.It also contains what could be the one and only photo. I really think this is what the 'ignore' button is all about unless one really likes this type of thread![]()
--
Thierry
Not true, I'm saying that you think my desire for a 5DM2 spec and price is somehow denigrating the D700/D3s and you are wrong if you think that. Nikon FF is leaving 12 MP behind, that's a reality. When remains to be seen, so does price. The D3s is the best high iso 12 MP camera in the world, it is not higher res or a larger file size than the 5DM2 and it's video is smaller size too. These are facts.But you keep telling us that we are wrong to like what does the job for us.
Then I'd say Nikon whipped Canon's butt.But what if the D3s was Nikon's answer to the 5DM2?
Compromised? Like the EOS 5D Mk II with its antiquated autofocus, slow frame rate, and unimpressive build quality?I just don't see how the next FF from Nikon can be win win, it's either going to be a compromised camera or way too expensive.
Try not posting flame posts and people won't find any in your history. How's that for advice.Try staying on topic and stop stalking, how's that for advice.No I didnt but good catchbut have you checked out the one and only thread he has posted on the Canon forums?
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1032&message=36107847
That's good advice.It also contains what could be the one and only photo. I really think this is what the 'ignore' button is all about unless one really likes this type of thread![]()
--
Thierry