I kind of doubt that the difference in price between the Xsi, a 20D, or a 30D is going to be enough to get a decent lens; one that really matters.
Kind of off topic, A short, but true story.....
Following a recent concert, a friend and I were talking (who owns the 450D). He was all worried and bummed-out about the quality of his photos coming out his camera when compared to the shots I captured. He wanted to clarify what camera I was using.
I showed him my 8 MP Canon 30D....and his eyes grew wide with amazement. And he was shaking his head with anxiety and disillusionment. And then he said that my 30D was such a better camera than his 450D. And his proof was with the direct comparison of his images to the ones I just taken.
And I simply laughed out loud!!!!!! Friend to friend, of course!!!
I told him (and he’s still my friend) that it wasn’t the camera….it was the photographer!!!!!
My advice to him:
- Get out of Auto mode
- Understand the causal affects to exposure
- Shoot RAW
- Try to see the light
- Learn to bounce his flash
- Invest in decent lenses
- Don't try to hand hold every damn shot
Back to your brother....
Any one of these three cameras will capture stunning images. Your brother (who as you say wants to get into digital photography) will be the defining aka "weak" variable. These three cameras share some very nice features. One thing that you may not be aware of between the bodies...the Xsi is plastic, the 20D/30D are a magnesium alloy body. The 20D/30D are significantly larger too.
My recommendation, get the one that feels the best in his hands.
Regards, Mike
Hello!
My brother wants to get into digital photography and is hoping to spend approximately 500. Of the three bodies I listed, which would you recommend? I'm leaning towards the Xsi or the 20d because the 30d wasn't much of an improvement and the extra cash could be used in purchasing lenses.
Thanks!
--
B.R.A.S.S. (Breathe, Relax, Aim, Sight, Squeeze)