I do have to say that I agree with Michelle when she asks why she
can't do anything about it. Although it is considered normal and
acceptable, if there are cameras out there without the dead pixel,
I want one of those! : ) Sam
Likewise, Sam. That's exactly how I feel.
To me, $800 is a lot of money.
If this were an older model I'd purchased second hand, I would
definitely be able to 'just accept' the dead pixel. However, when
paying full retail for a brand new item, I feel I'm entitled to
receive brand new quality (i.e. NO defects). I'm curious: how come
so many posters here feel this is something that 'just is' and
nothing can be done about it? Why is it idealistic to expect no
dead pixels upon delivery of an expensive camera?
Bottom line is, I guess I just feel disappointed.
I exhaustively researched my purchase decision, waited awhile for
the model to come out, then shelled out the cash, and to have it
arrive sub-par, kinda took the wind out of my sails.
Now I'll have to attempt an exchange, or contact Canon...
...Which means, in addition to the bum LCD disappointment, I now
have to spend more of my time and encounter whatever 'customer
service' nightmare probably awaits. Ugh.
Michelle
I just received my Canon G3 today and noticed a tiny black dot in
the LCD (mostly visible with white backgrounds) but can also see on
other objects.
I don't know what this might indicate. My only other digital camera
experience is with my Epson PhotoPC 700 of four years and I never
experienced anything like this.
Did I receive a bad camera? Any advice from more experienced users
is greatly appreciated!
Thank You,
Michelle