Beautiful woman with a corset piercing

Damn political correctness. She can do whatever she wants with her body and you can shoot whatever you want with your camera. However, I can have whatever opinion about this and that is:

1. A really beautiful woman does not need to attract cheap attention with studs and tattoo.

2. A woman doing this has no respect for her parents' feelings.

3. A woman doing this just because some cheap "stars" have tattoos and studs does not realise that stars are those who may have good physical features and often also abuse their bodies with drugs, with loose lifestyle, relationships, alcohol, ... and are therefore not the best models of human beings.

4. She needs attention much more than any other virtue or value as a human being.

5. It is extremely unlikely that a woman with lots of studs and tattoos is virtuous by traditional standards that most peoples in the world have.

6. No one with a voluntary tattoo or stud is worth my time. No picture with them is worth looking. Anyone taking those pictures are crap photogs.

7. Taste has nothing to do with money, social standing, or education, or anything. If you have low taste, you are low and ugly.
 
6. No one with a voluntary tattoo or stud is worth my time. No picture with them is worth looking. Anyone taking those pictures are crap photogs.
Come on Manchu! Don't hold back! Why don't you tell us how you really feel?

... and also, if this is true, why did you just look at them and waste your time writing this lengthy and completely OT post?

I guess I'll never understand...

--
http://lol-photoblog.blogspot.com/
 
The girl has the right to do what ever she wants with her body.

People have the right to form their own opinions and express there own opinions on the matter.

The idea that people should only be judged in a positive manner is just as closed minded as people who only judge negatively.

The images themselves are somewhat flat and the second is soft.

--
I agree, I guess. She can do as she wishes, but from appearances, I don't see any special sanitary set-ups for all the stabs; I'd be damned if I'd allow piercing with some guy with hair braids hanging right around the needle.

I'm consistently amused, though, by people who supposedly defy convention but then scream about being judged on their appearance. Appearance is always how we first judge a person. There are better ways to stand out from the crowd these days, in my opinion.

--
Charlie Self
http://www.charlieselfonline.com
 
6. No one with a voluntary tattoo or stud is worth my time. No picture with them is worth looking. Anyone taking those pictures are crap photogs.
WOW , so im a crap photog? i have a few choice words for you . but id probably be deleted off this site .

to say someone is a crap photog for taking photos like this is crappy , its appalling!

what about all those professional photographers who amazing works of art who work for tattoo/piercings magazines? are they crap photogs?

--
doing photography since june 2007
being serious about it since summer 09
Pentax K7 - D-BG4 Battery Grip
DA* 16-50mm F/2.8
DA* 50-135mm F/2.8
Sigma 150-500mm F/5-6.3
Sigma 10mm F/2.8 Fisheye
Sigma 105mm F/2.8 Macro
2 - AF540fgz external flash
Silk U-212 Deluxe Tripod
Benro 98m8 CF monopod
 
That is nasty looking, just my opinion. : )
 
HAHHAHAH we call him sideshow bob all the time ...
--
doing photography since june 2007
being serious about it since summer 09
Pentax K7 - D-BG4 Battery Grip
DA* 16-50mm F/2.8
DA* 50-135mm F/2.8
Sigma 150-500mm F/5-6.3
Sigma 10mm F/2.8 Fisheye
Sigma 105mm F/2.8 Macro
2 - AF540fgz external flash
Silk U-212 Deluxe Tripod
Benro 98m8 CF monopod
 
However, I can have whatever opinion about this and that is:

1. A really beautiful woman does not need to attract cheap attention with studs and tattoo.

2. A woman doing this has no respect for her parents' feelings.

3. A woman doing this just because some cheap "stars" have tattoos and studs does not realise that stars are those who may have good physical features and often also abuse their bodies with drugs, with loose lifestyle, relationships, alcohol, ... and are therefore not the best models of human beings.

4. She needs attention much more than any other virtue or value as a human being.

5. It is extremely unlikely that a woman with lots of studs and tattoos is virtuous by traditional standards that most peoples in the world have.

6. No one with a voluntary tattoo or stud is worth my time. No picture with them is worth looking. Anyone taking those pictures are crap photogs.

7. Taste has nothing to do with money, social standing, or education, or anything. If you have low taste, you are low and ugly.
Wow. Unbelievable.

You must live in a bubble of isolation if that's actually how you feel. You should get out more and interact with the rest of the human race a little.
--
John Cafarella
Melbourne, Australia
 
^^^^^^i like the above comment :-) ^^^^^
--
doing photography since june 2007
being serious about it since summer 09
Pentax K7 - D-BG4 Battery Grip
DA* 16-50mm F/2.8
DA* 50-135mm F/2.8
Sigma 150-500mm F/5-6.3
Sigma 10mm F/2.8 Fisheye
Sigma 105mm F/2.8 Macro
2 - AF540fgz external flash
Silk U-212 Deluxe Tripod
Benro 98m8 CF monopod
 
^^^^^^i like the above comment :-) ^^^^^
I am sorry - but I dont get it D2M.

You say that everyone shall be allowed to do as he/she likes. Some kind of personal freedom to shape your own way of living and being.

Then some choose to do something provoking. And then - obviously - "the other ones" are not allowed to be provoked - or at least not tell they are.

What kind of freedom are you talking about then?

NOTE - that I dont really agree with Manchu - but is not the whole idea with freedom that this dont matter? Its his opinion after all?

Or is freedom only about how you dress or decorate yourself? A very limited freedom in that case.

--
Roland

support http://www.openraw.org/
(Sleeping - so the need to support it is even higher)

X3F tools : http://www.proxel.se/x3f.html
 
^^^^^^i like the above comment :-) ^^^^^
I am sorry - but I dont get it D2M.

You say that everyone shall be allowed to do as he/she likes. Some kind of personal freedom to shape your own way of living and being.

Then some choose to do something provoking. And then - obviously - "the other ones" are not allowed to be provoked - or at least not tell they are.
Insulting is different from provoking don't you think.

Just look at the answer Manchu did just above yours...
What kind of freedom are you talking about then?

NOTE - that I dont really agree with Manchu - but is not the whole idea with freedom that this dont matter? Its his opinion after all?
As long as it is expressed in a respectful manner... which is clearly not the case.

D2M didn't insult anyone, nor did his models.
Or is freedom only about how you dress or decorate yourself? A very limited freedom in that case.
Can't you see the disctinction between saying "I don't like tattos and/or piercing for such and such reasons and your pictures are not good and/or interesting for such and such reasons" and saying "Tatooed/pierced people are scums and people who take pictures of them are crap photographers."?

Or are you just trolling around trying to get attention?

--
http://lol-photoblog.blogspot.com/
 
Article 29.2:

"In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society. "

As long as you do not break the law (which is here to define the "just requirements of morality, public order and and the general welfare in a democratic society"), you are free to do what you want.

In my country (and on this forum...), deliberately insulting people is unlawful, piercing and/or taking pictures of pierced/tatooed people is not.

What about you?

--
http://lol-photoblog.blogspot.com/
 
Can't you see the disctinction between saying "I don't like tattos and/or piercing for such and such reasons and your pictures are not good and/or interesting for such and such reasons" and saying "Tatooed/pierced people are scums and people who take pictures of them are crap photographers."?
Oh ... I do. Manchus post was not all that brilliant IMHO. I dont think you can stretch it to be unlawful though.
Or are you just trolling around trying to get attention?
Now Mr LOL. I dont know about you - but in my vocabulary this is a try to insinuate negative properties about my person. You have several times said that you dont do such things. You and D2M do not insult others - you are the nice ones and the "others" are the meanies.

Not that I in particular mind - but just for your information so you might get a more diversified picture of your own posts. They (and D2Ms) are not as innocent as you claim IMHO.

--
Roland

support http://www.openraw.org/
(Sleeping - so the need to support it is even higher)

X3F tools : http://www.proxel.se/x3f.html
 
Can't you see the disctinction between saying "I don't like tattos and/or piercing for such and such reasons and your pictures are not good and/or interesting for such and such reasons" and saying "Tatooed/pierced people are scums and people who take pictures of them are crap photographers."?
Oh ... I do. Manchus post was not all that brilliant IMHO. I dont think you can stretch it to be unlawful though.
Well, it is unlawful at least on this forum isn't it?
Or are you just trolling around trying to get attention?
Now Mr LOL. I dont know about you - but in my vocabulary this is a try to insinuate negative properties about my person. You have several times said that you dont do such things. You and D2M do not insult others - you are the nice ones and the "others" are the meanies.
You are right, this was uncalled for. You are not a troll.

Please, accept my sincere apologies.
Not that I in particular mind - but just for your information so you might get a more diversified picture of your own posts. They (and D2Ms) are not as innocent as you claim IMHO.
I never claimed to be "innocent" (what does that mean btw?) as you justly pointed out, I have my share of defaults - Also I clearly have an "agenda": I do believe in mutual respect and human liberties, hence my reaction to disrespectful posts expressing contempt for other people's customs or habits.

As long as someone doesn't step on my liberties, I will fight to ensure that he can enjoy his.

(I will also fight against anyone steping on mine... it goes without saying! ;-) )
--
http://lol-photoblog.blogspot.com/
 
I think the spirit is the same but I find the formulation even clearer.

Article XXVIII. The rights of man are limited by the rights of others, by the security of all, and by the just demands of the general welfare and the advancement of democracy.

Article XXIX. It is the duty of the individual so to conduct himself in relation to others that each and every one may fully form and develop his personality.

--
http://lol-photoblog.blogspot.com/
 
Well, it is unlawful at least on this forum isn't it?
Hmmmmmmmmmm .. dont know. Its a border case maybe. Just as our discussion right now really is off topic I assume.
You are right, this was uncalled for. You are not a troll.
:) - there are not all that many Trolls in forums any more. They were more evident some years ago. I dont know why - maybe the world is more grown up now.
Please, accept my sincere apologies.
OK - nemas problemas.

--
Roland

support http://www.openraw.org/
(Sleeping - so the need to support it is even higher)

X3F tools : http://www.proxel.se/x3f.html
 
this has been my funnest thread ever . i should post photos of my tattoos hahhaahaa then you'd really see the hate fly , i have really offensive tattoos :-)

thanks for allowing me to discuss who i am and my passion on equality and trying not to judge others (though i am not perfect myself , im still a work in progress)
--
doing photography since june 2007
being serious about it since summer 09
Pentax K7 - D-BG4 Battery Grip
DA* 16-50mm F/2.8
DA* 50-135mm F/2.8
Sigma 150-500mm F/5-6.3
Sigma 10mm F/2.8 Fisheye
Sigma 105mm F/2.8 Macro
2 - AF540fgz external flash
Silk U-212 Deluxe Tripod
Benro 98m8 CF monopod
 
D2M-Photos wrote:
Hi D2M,
this has been my funnest thread ever . i should post photos of my tattoos hahhaahaa then you'd really see the hate fly , i have really offensive tattoos :-)
well as long as they're not willy tats or piercings .... I say, blast away :D
thanks for allowing me to discuss who i am and my passion on equality and trying not to judge others (though i am not perfect myself , im still a work in progress)
I thoughts pics were good but , as more of document(er) photog (?), I
would have liked to have seen more of actual piercing procedure shots (ultra
wide and upclose) type shots... but, that's just me :) Also, the artist and
subject might have had other views on that, as well.

Cheers and looking forward to the tat pics ;)

Jackk
--
doing photography since june 2007
being serious about it since summer 09
Pentax K7 - D-BG4 Battery Grip
DA* 16-50mm F/2.8
DA* 50-135mm F/2.8
Sigma 150-500mm F/5-6.3
Sigma 10mm F/2.8 Fisheye
Sigma 105mm F/2.8 Macro
2 - AF540fgz external flash
Silk U-212 Deluxe Tripod
Benro 98m8 CF monopod
--
STREET PHOTOGRAPHY DOCUMENTARY: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6kkHKP4Gnd0

( UPDATED NOV 16th )MY BLOG.... http://www.nakedmanonawire.blogspot.com

MY EMAIL ADDRESS IN IS MY 'VIEW PLAN'

It's amazing what one can do when one doesn't know what one is doing :)
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top