Selling celebrity photos.

Tony B.11964

Forum Enthusiast
Messages
396
Reaction score
0
Location
US
I've got some pics I took of some celebrity musicians during performances they gave that I attended. Could someone tell me what the legal implications of selling these online might be? Are there trademark issues here?

thanks in advance,

Tony
 
Why don't you get a job and stopmaking money off other peoples business?......LMAO
What a Looser!! hahahahahaha

Tony wrote:
I've got some pics I took of some celebrity musicians during
performances they gave that I attended. Could someone tell me what
the legal implications of selling these online might be? Are there
trademark issues here?
 
Why don't you get a job and stopmaking money off other peoples
business?......LMAO
What a Looser!! hahahahahaha
I seem to recall that there are magazines which profit dearly off of other people's business, not to mention television shows and newspapers. I also seem to recall that several photographers make very good money off of famous individuals--Paparazzi comes to mind. So, I really don't think it is such a stretch to ask such a question. Making money has nothing to do with effort or morality--it has everything to do with timing and what the demand is at the moment.

--
http://pub103.ezboard.com/bthedigitaldinguscommunity
http://d100.topcities.com/
http://e10club.topcities.com/
--
Please see my Profile for equipment I use
 
You've been here at dpreview for 2 whole days and already you've got a mouth! If you have a point to make, reasons for it are a good place to start. What you wrote is not only useless, but extremely rude.
TROLL comes to mind!
Why don't you get a job and stopmaking money off other peoples
business?......LMAO
What a Looser!! hahahahahaha
 
I've got some pics I took of some celebrity musicians during
performances they gave that I attended. Could someone tell me what
the legal implications of selling these online might be? Are there
trademark issues here?

thanks in advance,

Tony
--
Back to the subject at hand...

Yes there are issues. The artists who gave the performance own the copyright and "any portion thereof may not be reproduced without their permission...." etc.
Performance is not a "public" venue, like a street is...

--
jdoyle
 
Back to the subject at hand...
Yes there are issues. The artists who gave the performance own the
copyright and "any portion thereof may not be reproduced without
their permission...." etc.
Performance is not a "public" venue, like a street is...

--
jdoyle
Since we are talking about copyright, what about private buildings shot from public streets, can we sell them as art?

--
JR
 
Since we are talking about copyright, what about private buildings
shot from public streets, can we sell them as art?

--
JR
I am under the impression that you can sell anything as "art" - a painting of Cambells Soup is a good example. This is especially true for "one off" type of stuff. Selling a single photograph as "art" would not land you in trouble as say for example, if you started selling many prints? Publishing your photographic "art" in an "art" book also gives you some leway, from what I have read.

There are cases when the design of the building itself can be protected under trademark. There was an important case where a photographer shot photos of the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame and was selling them. The Rock & Roll Hall of Fame sued him and lost their case. Their appeal was also turned down. An example of a building trademark would be the Transamerica building in SF which is incorporated into the Transamerica trademarked logo.

You can read more about the "Rock Hall" case here:

http://re.cleveland.oh.us/archives/19991001.html

And always, always remember of course:

Shoot first, get permission later!

:)
 
Since we are talking about copyright, what about private buildings
shot from public streets, can we sell them as art?

--
JR
I am under the impression that you can sell anything as "art" - a
painting of Cambells Soup is a good example. This is especially
true for "one off" type of stuff. Selling a single photograph as
"art" would not land you in trouble as say for example, if you
started selling many prints? Publishing your photographic "art" in
an "art" book also gives you some leway, from what I have read.

There are cases when the design of the building itself can be
protected under trademark. There was an important case where a
photographer shot photos of the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame and was
selling them. The Rock & Roll Hall of Fame sued him and lost their
case. Their appeal was also turned down. An example of a building
trademark would be the Transamerica building in SF which is
incorporated into the Transamerica trademarked logo.

You can read more about the "Rock Hall" case here:

http://re.cleveland.oh.us/archives/19991001.html

And always, always remember of course:

Shoot first, get permission later!

:)
--
JR
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top