-
Welcome to the new forums! Please read this first. For known issues we are working to resolve, click here.
New Adobe Raw file plugin
- Thread starter Danny Cardenas
- Start date
Troponin
Senior Member
D60 raw files-- I like the way that sounds. Athough the report didn't mention what type of puter was used-- it still sounds good to me.
Troponin
Troponin
Richard Earney
Well-known member
Well presumably it would have been a reasonably high spec computer, but the very fact that it come from Adobe is bound to be a good thing!
Can't wait ...
--
--
Richard Earney
http://www.method-photo.co.uk
boarderphreak
Senior Member
Simon-Ph
Senior Member
Now that will depend on what/who's hand they were talking about. If that hand has 30 fingers, I will be disappointed
--
Simon-Ph
David Dodd
Leading Member
Yes, I wouldn't worry about that - I'm sure they'll make it for Mac OS X too.
David
David
Julianne Kost was doing the demo of the raw files in PS at Photo Expo. I took a class with her the previous day and she was using an Apple laptop and it looked like she was using the same computer during the presentation. The demo was pretty awesome since it looked like users would have a lot of control with saturation, temperature, etc.
Danny Cardenas
Leading Member
The demonstration was done for Rob Galbraith on a PC, which shouldn't be taken as meaning the plugin will be windoze only.
Plus Sallie Jo just mentioned she saw it demo'd on a Mac.
Plus Sallie Jo just mentioned she saw it demo'd on a Mac.
Troponin
Senior Member
Let's just hope Adobe can get the dang plugin out ASAP. I will assume that since it is a plugin it can be compiled rather easily for both platforms?
I have been waiting for the day to do raw conversions in seconds (maybe a handfull
Trop in waiting
I have been waiting for the day to do raw conversions in seconds (maybe a handfull
Trop in waiting
Thomas Knoll
Forum Enthusiast
Don't worry.
K
Ken W.
Guest
was that the changes you make are done in "real-time" and therefore the processing has already been done to the file. For example, once you make a change to a setting, the file is processed according to your settings. Once you are happy with the final results, you hit okay and all your settings are finalized (which only takes a handful of seconds).
--
Ken W.
http://www.quantumarts.com
http://www.mywhistler.com
--
Ken W.
http://www.quantumarts.com
http://www.mywhistler.com
If it honestly takes only a few seconds to convert the file, then shame on Canon for putting out such crud, and making thousands of photographers waste so much time converting many millions of pictures.
Paul
Paul
Richard Earney
Well-known member
So does this mean that someone at Adobe - you
- has a Digital SLR and is fed up with the pain of RAW Conversion and decided to do something about it.Just wondering
--
--
Richard Earney
http://www.method-photo.co.uk
Troponin
Senior Member
They wrote the "crud" SDK's, I guess it's up to the developers of CRW converters to either improve on Canon's SDK's or write better ones. I am "assuming" that Adobe has either gone to bed with canon and wrote better code or just decided to do it alone (sounds like a good marketing decision given all the fundy's that like raw conversion).
In any event, if the plugins are real and the timing is only a handfull of seconds, I won't need breeze or yarcplus in the current versions.
I will wait for the plugin to do conversions, until then, its Large/fine JPEGS unless it is absolutely critical.
Troponin
In any event, if the plugins are real and the timing is only a handfull of seconds, I won't need breeze or yarcplus in the current versions.
I will wait for the plugin to do conversions, until then, its Large/fine JPEGS unless it is absolutely critical.
Troponin
Lou Spirito
Well-known member
Whoa! The master himself has spoken!
Thanks for putting us Mac OS X users at ease. It's a shame that we have to rely on Adobe for software that should have been provided by Canon months ago. But hey, if it carries the Knoll reputation behind it, I for one am thrilled.
Oh, and thanks for the outstanding contributions you -- and your brother -- continue to make to digital media.
Lou.
Troponin
Senior Member
sounds too much like the MS monopoly. Do you really want to be tied to canon for everything digital like Microsoft!!!!
Trop
Trop
Thomas Knoll
Forum Enthusiast
Basically yes.So does this mean that someone at Adobe - you
SLR and is fed up with the pain of RAW Conversion and decided to do
something about it.
Just wondering
--
--
Richard Earney
http://www.method-photo.co.uk
There are a number of digital camera shooters on the Photoshop engineering team. I personally use a D60, and my primary computer is a Macintosh. I was not real happy with Canon's Macintosh software....
KevinDufff
Senior Member
Personaly these people have provided us with a way out, with very fairly priced software.
They themselves have done a very good job considering the limitations of Canon SDK so i for one will not just be dropping them.
Give them time, i am sure that they will move in the appropriate direction (If necessary)
I will NOT drop them and WILL pay for an upgrade if there has to be a magor upgrade to keep the software usefull.
D60, 16-35 L, 28-70 L, 70-200 f2.8 L IS, 2x Extender,550EX Flash and a bunch of average images.
But improving slowly.
They themselves have done a very good job considering the limitations of Canon SDK so i for one will not just be dropping them.
Give them time, i am sure that they will move in the appropriate direction (If necessary)
I will NOT drop them and WILL pay for an upgrade if there has to be a magor upgrade to keep the software usefull.
--
D60, 16-35 L, 28-70 L, 70-200 f2.8 L IS, 2x Extender,550EX Flash and a bunch of average images.
But improving slowly.
boarderphreak
Senior Member
When it comes to supporting their expensive hardware, you're darn skippy!
I'm sorry, but there's little excuse for Canon's history of ill support.
I'm sorry, but there's little excuse for Canon's history of ill support.
Keyboard shortcuts
- f
- Forum