Which new Leica for street photograp[hy???

Your old street images are fantastic. Like a breath of fresh air to see such excellent candid B&W work as this. Strong composition, great technical skill and really capturing the moment perfectly. These images are the closest I have seen on here to the greats like HCB and Erwitt.

So many posters on this forum seem to think any random image out of focus, poorly composed and reproduced in B&W passes for great reportage Leica work. The class of your work shines and shows how it should be done.
 
I love what you did. Old photos always have a special serenity, even if they are city shots, in contrast with the contemporary ones. And the more friendly faces & every detail that spells nostalgia.

Yes, times have changed. The cities naturally don’t look the same any more. There are new city signs. Everywhere is much busier. People’s attitudes have changed. But that won’t prevent you from getting good shots nor the interest derived from street photography.

This gentleman uses solely S90, not even S95. A very modern approach & mindset :

http://www.flickr.com/photos/ollibapril65/4995910548/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ollibapril65/5030615788/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ollibapril65/4889121493/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ollibapril65/4881082904/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ollibapril65/5008783744/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ollibapril65/4936268894/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ollibapril65/4932823277/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ollibapril65/4908058802/

I think they are very very good street photos. Like every good photographer, he sees novelty in apparently everyday ordinary scenes.

If you already have a S95, I suggest keep to it. It’s compact & has a fast autofocus. X1 of course surpasses it in every IQ aspect. But AF would be slower, of course neither that would prevent any good photographer from making nice works even in case of street snapshots.

Film is great fun. But really digital saves a lot of money & efforts; after all, every “failed” or medicore negative counts, which normally account to more than 95% of our shots. Embrace digital & post-processing – there are a lot of fun & endless possibilities inside. : )

------
clarence
 
Christian, I just wanted to complement you on your photos. Really quite wonderful.

Honestly, I think one can use whatever camera, film or digital. I've used my Leica M4, Nikon D90, and a few digital point and shoots and gotten successful images from all of them but the Leica M is indeed the classic.
 
i'm not the right one to advice you for a camera choice ... but your work is a real jump in the past...a wonderful work ...where to see the life in that days...

A precious and timeless set of photos !!

Regards, Gianluca
 
Superb outstanding photos.
 
Once again thanks all for the advice and checking out my "streetshooter" series. I hope I don't get a visit from the FBI for mentioning that word. I heard that a photographer and his assistant, on a New York city subway, were discussing their upcoming "shoot" of a celebrity. When they got off they were detained and asked who they were going to shoot!
Actually, shooting today's street scenes will look quaint in 30 to 50 years!
 
though the new Fujifilm offering may be a great alternative
those folks from Fujifilm are passionate about photography & very clever
Weegee wrote:
snip
Actually, shooting today's street scenes will look quaint in 30 to 50 years!
excellent street shooting, Weegee

you can make grand photographs with just about any camera, but the best Leica camera for street work has to be the M9, particularly when coupled with a fine Leica M lens
--
--
pbase & dpreview supporter
DPR forum member since 5/2001
http://www.pbase.com/artichoke
 
That's one of Weegee's. I wish I could claim it, but I can't!
really suits the "occasion". =-)

btw, are those nicely processed M9 noise or are those film grains?

--

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GALLERY: http://galay.fotki.com

Gary
--
  • Mark Ehlers (formerly 'markE')
http://www.pbase.com/marke



'Good street/wildlife photography is a controlled accident,
a vision of preparation and surrender materialized.'
 
To all of you who took a look at my streetshooter series and interested in my "technique", here goes. As a 15 year old spending the summer in France ( I was born there and all my relatives are there ), I happened on a gallery in Paris. There, I saw a bunch of photographs taken by some guy named Henri Cartier Bresson. I was fascinated by his term " the decisive moment". I thought to myself," very true! Everything in life has a decisive moment". From that day on I decided to try my hand at the decisive moment.

I scraped and saved for over a year doing odd jobs until I had enough money for a used double stroke M3. I could only afford the 50mmf/2.8 ( or was it the f3.5?- stolen some time ago ). So, I went out and photographed things and people that struck my fancy.

For film, I used whatever was the cheapest! I think alot of it was black and white movie film that I bought in 100ft. rolls and bulk loaded myself. Sadly, some of the film was very out of date and ended up foggy and grainy. I made the best prints I could but some looked as if they had been shot at ASA 1600 by today's film standards.

90% of my photographs were pre-focused. I'd hide my camera ( I covered it with black masking tape and wore black!) and pull it out at what I perceived to be the decisive moment. Click and I was gone. Next prey.

I made all my prints on a Focomat Ic ( almost the only enlarger that would give me sharp grain from edge to edge ( Dursts were also good ). Being a condenser enlarger, it showed grain and dust. I preferred that to softer images.

Finally, on most of my old negatives, the emulsion has some cracks ( that's why I scanned most of my negatives and created my Streetshooter series). I scanned most of them with a Nikon Coolscan 5000. Good scanner, but like the Focomat enlarger, it seems to amplify the grain! Yes, I probably could do multi-pass scans but that would take forever. I could also spend more time playing with S curves and burning and dodging, but again, it's time consuming. At least I work a bit harder that Cartier Bresson who never made one of his own prints!

Thanks again for looking! 1/250 at F/5.6 and be there!
 
Mine was my M3 with the same lens...50/2.0. It was stolen.

After reading an article at Luminous Landscape 1-1/2 years ago (Travels to Japan) I bought a Canon G9 and a Franiec grip. I thought I had gone to heaven! Very versatile camera. (for me; other opinions may differ.) Compelled to improve it, I bought a G11. Should not have. No Franiec grip. (shape of camera).

Michael at Luminous has described a "film advance lever" add-on for Leica P&S's. It's expensive. (Thumb's up I think is the name.)

Leica P&S and thumb's up are still on my wish list.

DaveL
M3/M4P
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top