T B Gray
Senior Member
I basically agree - the buffer and FPS are already there in the 1D so the next evolution could give you a 1Ds with the FPS/Buffer of the 1D.
Also more dynamic range would always be nice. At some point the marginal cost of the incremental improvements won't equal the marginal benefit (ie a reduction is "missed/poor shots") - and I won't be tempted to upgrade.
Comments, criticisms, advice appreciated
Also more dynamic range would always be nice. At some point the marginal cost of the incremental improvements won't equal the marginal benefit (ie a reduction is "missed/poor shots") - and I won't be tempted to upgrade.
--Not that anything that the 1Ds does is not adequate or even great,
but in 18 months, there will be something that does even more.
In much the same way, that my laptop still does what it always did
(and not obsolete) - I would upgrade to get the USB 2.0 ports, a
bigger hard drive, etc. etc.
I started with a Nikon CP 950 - for a year then a D30 2 years,
20,000 frames later - (it's easy to hold down the shutter release
when it doesn't cost anything).
As for being obsolete within a year (or whatever) - the technology
of the AF, body and lenses evolves at a snails pace compared to the
electronics. But unless you're a pro, is there much of an
incentive to print at any larger than 13 x 19? If not, then 11mp
probably meets resolution requirements in an absolute sense. My
sense is that technology will drive down price, but I don't see the
1Ds becoming obsolete in a functional sense for a while. (but new
toys will always be so much fun...)
Comments, criticisms, advice appreciated